π¨π¨π¬π§πͺπΊππ¦π«π₯ππͺπΊπ¬π§π¨π¨ From Prawns to Pork to the NI Protocol itβs clear that the biggest issue from #brexit is caused by EU plant/food rules - is it time now to rethink? Or if not, why not? And then what? Stay with me. /1
So we all know @DavidGHFrost negotiated a sovereignty-first #Brexit that prioritised taking back control of our laws over market access....but that fell particularly hard on food exporters and THICKENED the Irish Sea trade border, causing many of the woes on the Irish Protocol /2
@DavidGHFrost Lord Frost described his thinking in terms of the Magna Carta tradition at this week's @Policy_Exchange event with @michaelgove, saying that the English instinctively don't like it when ββother people set laws we have to live byβ. /3
(See 14 mins in)
@DavidGHFrost@Policy_Exchange@michaelgove These are abstract concepts but the resulted in concrete impacts, in the absence of any agreement covering food standards, resulting in mountains of paperwork...71 pages for a lorry load of fish, cost (for example) salmon farmers Β£11m in Jan/Feb /4
@DavidGHFrost@Policy_Exchange@michaelgove It is also by FAR the biggest headache in the Northern Ireland Protocol as experts explained to the @CommonsNIAC this week, which is adding to the community stress/frictions in NI that the Government says it wants to end /5
@DavidGHFrost@Policy_Exchange@michaelgove@CommonsNIAC That is why the government, per Frost, took unilateral action to safeguard Northern Ireland's fragile politics by extending grace periods under the Protocol - to the fury of Brussels.
But there is one "Unilateral action" that would REALLY fix it? A Swiss-style SPS deal /6
@DavidGHFrost@Policy_Exchange@michaelgove@CommonsNIAC@SamuelMarcLowe It is true - as Sam says - this would require the UK to dynamically align with EU rules and I can hear you screaming "they'll never do it! have you not been listening these last four years!" - and I agree - but we should at least ask "why not?" /8
Except that this would be a 'sovereign decision', from which the UK could withdraw as/when it saw fit. Lots of treaties require that. Aren't the Swiss 'sovereign'? /9
Really? If the first three months of this year has shown anything, no-one in the real world gives a stuff about this stuff. Except businesses impacted and folk in Northern Ireland. /10
Is anyone really sitting in the pub, thumping the bar and moaning that their Magna Carta rights have been traduced because Cornish lobstermen are following EU phytosanitary rules? Iβd hazard not. /11
True, but a) is that deal happening any time soon under a Biden administration. Answer 'no'.
And b) will the UK government every give the US what it wants on food standards do such a deal? (unlikely). /12
@DavidGHFrost@Policy_Exchange@michaelgove@CommonsNIAC@SamuelMarcLowe And remember, if the UK did suddenly decide it was wanted a US deal (and the political hangover from hormone raised beef, chlorine wash chicken etc) then it could end a EU-UK deal, accepting fallout - which we've just had a taste of /13
π¨πͺπΊπ¬π§ππ«π₯§ππͺππͺπΊπ¬π§π¨From April 21 the EU is introducing new rules on composite foods (pizza, chocolate, crisps etc) that are going to pile new red tape on U.K. food manufacturers/1
@FinancialTimes@mroliverbarnes@jimbrunsden So what fresh hell is this? Well, the EU has a new regulation coming into force on composite foods - 2020/2235 - which will require 'third countries' (which the UK now is, after #Brexit) to do a lot more form-filling at Β£m's to industry /2
@FinancialTimes@mroliverbarnes@jimbrunsden The new rules mean that so-called "shelf-stable" products that contain meat (a pepperoni pizza) or pasteurised milk (a choc bar or a curry sauce with yoghurt in it) will require a vet-stamped Export Health Certificate.../3
AS EU mulls legal action against UK on Northern Irish Protocol - @Jacob_Rees_Mogg tells @ConHome podcast that UK does have "selfish interest" in Northern Ireland - and explains UK position on protocol - listen from 9m30s. Potentially provocative. Why? /1
@Jacob_Rees_Mogg@ConHome Well that phrase "no selfish strategic or economic interest" was used by Thatcher's NI Secretary Peter Brooke as a key signal to Republicans in the gestation of the Good Friday Agreement - see account here /2
@Jacob_Rees_Mogg@ConHome It underpins the notion of "rigorous impartiality" that the UK Secretary of State has to both communities in Northern Ireland - a notion that #Brexit has always made problematic. More on that here /3
π¨πͺπΊπ¬π§ππ₯ππ¦π£ππ¬π§πͺπΊπ¨So. As EU mulls legal sanctions v U.K. over handling of Northern Ireland Protocol today, biz groups that have already lost millions from #brexit urge @DavidGHFrost to cool the βmadmanβ strategy - stay with me. /1 on.ft.com/3qu9806
@DavidGHFrost This isn't a black and white story, since mistakes have been committed by both sides in the handling of the NI Protocol, but last week's decision to unilaterally extend grace periods by Frost has got right up EU noses - even IF, as UK protests, @michaelgove was planning same /2
@DavidGHFrost@michaelgove The problem here is that Frost has 'form' with the EU. Back in 2019 and in 2020 in negotiations on the Protocol and the TCA, he was often seen as deliberately confrontational - part of the Vote Leave 'madman' strategy to get a decent deal. /3
@FinancialTimes This is one of those post-#brexit bellwether stories because it points to the reality of what 'taking back control' means.
So yes, we have control, but that means, as @DavidHenigUK tells me, government has to decide between domestic pressure groups. It can't blame Brussels /2
@FinancialTimes@DavidHenigUK IN this case, that means @DefraGovUK@beisgovuk choosing between the chemical industry lobby and the environmental/health lobbies over how to build the UK's new 'sovereign' chemicals regulatory regime. Sounds techy, it is, but chemicals are in EVERYTHING, so it matters /3
Interesting test of UK-EU relations coming up shortly, as the UK government unilaterally grants itself more time to adjust to 'Irish Sea border' controls (export health certificates etc) for GB 'exporters' from April 1 to "at least" Oct 1st /1
On the downside, this move is 'unilateral' - i.e it wasn't agreed in the Joint Committee , which risks being seen as breach of good faith.
On the upside the @DefraGovUK email to stakeholders still talks about "phased" implementation of the certificates. So not walking away./2
@DefraGovUK Indeed that advice says that the Govt continues to urge all traders to "accelerate their readiness preparations"....so which speaks to the UK govt's official acceptance of the need to implement the NI Protocol /3
@FinancialTimes So the short story is UK has cut emissions by more than 70 per cent since 1990 (thanks to windmill bonanza + shuttering coal power stations) BUT that means that for a lot of consumers the greening has come largely unnoticed. That's about to change. /2
@FinancialTimes As Chris Stark @ChiefExecCCC tells me, the next leg of the 'net zero' journey is going to mean change for consumers. It'll not be enough to admire Greta Thunberg, it'll mean consumer changes in a) transport, mostly electric cars b) way we heat our (elderly) housing stock /3