π¬π§ Considering the sources who suggested the Russians or Syrians were jamming #RAF A400 GPS, it probably shouldn't have been published; but the British press have a lot of tabloid clickbait trash, so here we are. There is no sign this is any different than the past several yrs.
π¬π§ Sowing this sort of truism would be the sort of thing a propaganda campaign would do, and coincidentally members of the British military have bragged about their capacity, and willingness, to manipulate the press when it suits their narrative before.
I'm not sure this story comes from "journalism". No dates, times, specific flights, or specific planes were identified, and none of the info shows sign of being fact-checked with any external sources. There are open sources which can verify the RAF narrative, but nobody bothered.
Do I doubt the Syrians or Russians are trying to jam allied gps usage? Not at all. I'm sure they are. I doubt that this story, published in two British papers with barely any detail, is genuine news and not an influence operation, based on nothing that isn't in a NOTAM already.
How didn't either paper ask any questions about civilian vs military GPS signals, and if civilian airliners had any problems those days? The frequencies are not the same for the two, and the Russians or Syrians may be able to target one, and not the other. π€·ββοΈ
If we had specific dates and times of the alleged interference we could attempt to fact-check these claims, but somehow the editors didn't push back on their journalists for *checks notes* facts.
π¬π§ GPS issues near Cyprus are not new, or news, until an anonymous official from a British intelligence agency fed the story, devoid of real details, to two British newspapers. Someone should really be investigating how this single-sourced story got printed. MoD budget time? π€·ββοΈ
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
π¬π§ Royal Air Force EF-2000 Typhoon FGR4 #ZK353 returned to #RAF Akrotiri after conducting over five hours of operations, presumably over Iraq, 2021-03-19.
π¬π§ Royal Air Force EF-2000 Typhoon FGR4 #ZK353 returned to #RAF Akrotiri after conducting over five hours of operations, presumably over Iraq, 2021-03-11
πΊπΈ The NYT sticks with the party line, doesn't want to investigate; anonymous officials admit the United States military has cyber-attacked and penetrated Russian unclass and highly classified networks previously, installed peristant malware, and maintain C2 with said malware. π¬
"βEarly warningβ sensors placed by Cyber Command and the National Security Agency deep inside foreign networks to detect brewing attacks clearly failed. There is also no indication yet that any human intelligence alerted the United States to the hacking." -U.S. Gov't Official
- Intelligence operations are highly classified. If we are to believe the U.S. gov't was actually surprised by the SolarWinds hack, and didn't see it coming with their "sensors", those sensors would have been installed in multiple highly classified Russian intelligence networks.
There is nothing secret about the Boeing 747s that are commonly referred to as "Air Force One" (planeS, there are two!), we track them all the time, and the links are available on Twitter for you to follow along too. π
π¨π¦ I've heard riffs on "when the planes are not in for repairs, which is often." in #cndpoli news before, but I've never seen any data to substantiate, or gov't reports which identify, higher than normal maintenance for the #RCAF CC-150 Polaris fleet.
Data exists that can be used to substantiate, or refute, the claim, using open source flight history. For my part, I can tell you the planes are in the air very regularly, and there is no sign of them being sidelined for unscheduled extended periods. (except the "mishap"; 15001)
What's that? You want to see it for yourself? Well, okay.
Check the below embeded link daily for a few years and get back to me.