Just to be clear, you don't need any evidence but some rando on Facebook making a claim with no information for a rumour to spread in the world of #canpoli π€·ββοΈ
To recap, a boomer with a Facebook account said Trudeau is in Barbados for new years 12hrs ago because, wait for it, FlightRadar24 didn't show the details of the plane, THEREFORE IT MUST BE TRUDEAU.
Q: See the flaw in the logic is?
A: FlightRadar24 blocks lots of planes' info
Oh, and the fact is, no CL60 landed in Barbados this morning. The source of this garbage doesn't even know how to plausibly lie about the topic. This is low rent #disinformation.
Okay, @SBapati is right; the #CL60 that landed in #Barbados yesterday is #N605BS#A7D9FC (Stream Enterprises LLC); it's blocked on FlightRadar24, and FlightAware - but we do see it on ADSBexchange.
(It did not fly from Canada; nothing to do with Trudeau.)
πΊπΈ The NYT sticks with the party line, doesn't want to investigate; anonymous officials admit the United States military has cyber-attacked and penetrated Russian unclass and highly classified networks previously, installed peristant malware, and maintain C2 with said malware. π¬
"βEarly warningβ sensors placed by Cyber Command and the National Security Agency deep inside foreign networks to detect brewing attacks clearly failed. There is also no indication yet that any human intelligence alerted the United States to the hacking." -U.S. Gov't Official
- Intelligence operations are highly classified. If we are to believe the U.S. gov't was actually surprised by the SolarWinds hack, and didn't see it coming with their "sensors", those sensors would have been installed in multiple highly classified Russian intelligence networks.
There is nothing secret about the Boeing 747s that are commonly referred to as "Air Force One" (planeS, there are two!), we track them all the time, and the links are available on Twitter for you to follow along too. π
π¨π¦ I've heard riffs on "when the planes are not in for repairs, which is often." in #cndpoli news before, but I've never seen any data to substantiate, or gov't reports which identify, higher than normal maintenance for the #RCAF CC-150 Polaris fleet.
Data exists that can be used to substantiate, or refute, the claim, using open source flight history. For my part, I can tell you the planes are in the air very regularly, and there is no sign of them being sidelined for unscheduled extended periods. (except the "mishap"; 15001)
What's that? You want to see it for yourself? Well, okay.
Check the below embeded link daily for a few years and get back to me.