Reflecting on some career panels I participated in, networking was the buzzword that came up repeatedly. But what IS networking? How/why to do it?

A thread on what/how with some personal examples; I'll get to the why later (1/)

@AcademicChatter #careers #phdlife #altac
Networking, to me, most simply is making new *friends* who will _eventually_ help you *professionally*. It is those you you share something in common professionally (same industry, same kind of work etc) in contrast to personally (went to same college, like same music etc) (2/)
It takes a while to become good friends with someone. It's the same w/ networking - it takes time to build that bond, and need to be patient. One asks favours only from friends they know well - same for your networking connections. Start early, don't wait till you need a job (3/)
Now, *how* do you network? There are many, many ways. Easiest is to use your current network and expand from it.

Time for my story #1

3 yrs back, I wanted to find out about copyediting jobs - what it is, how much it pays, is it fun, how many opportunities exist etc. (4/)
I did this because I realised I liked editing and proofreading documents (more than writing them). I asked around with friends, family (my "network" at that time) if they knew anyone. Eventually, my professor had a cousin who had been a copyeditor. Bingo! (5/)
I asked if he'd be willing to "connect" me with her, and he obliged. He wrote an email to his cousin and me, "introducing" us to each other and why he was introducing me to her. I replied thanking him (very important), & asking her some of the Qs. (6/)
She replied with her answers, I then had more Q's, we exchanged multiple emails all of which helped me understand copyediting is fun but I most likely needed extra degree to get jobs. That was a 👎, BUT now she is part of my "network". I can always reach out later if needed. (7/)
Btw, what I did here is what's called an "informational interview". I collected info by this process while also establishing a new connection, but I didn't approach her with the goal of asking for a favour wrt a job. One should continuously do this from as early as possible (8/)
to expand understanding of options, build knowledge of what different jobs are really like (like, what *exactly* does it mean to be a scientist in industry? How's it different from academia?) These help one narrow down job options/related career paths to focus future efforts (9/)
A second way to network is to use social media, let's take Twitter as an example.

Story #2 from my experiences
There was this really interesting startup in London I came across but I did not know anyone there through my networks. But I started following their Twitter. (10/)
I would religiously check their new posts once every week not to miss a single post. When they posted something interesting (say, a video on their science or a post on their recent new partnership), I'd read more about it and then reply to the tweet, w/ something *unique* (11/)
For ex., One tweet was something like "this is really cool tech. Have you thought of applying it to problem X?" Or "this is very interesting. It probably must increase speed of process by 2 fold". Thus catching their attention. Eventually they followed me back (12/)
This now meant I could DM them! And I did, reiterating how cool their science is and starting a direct conversation. Then I asked if I could speak to one of the scientists, whose name and work I had already picked from LinkedIn and some googling, and they agreed! (13/)
Infact, this is how I got my first real job interview! #TrueStory
I didn't get the job but I did now know a couple of people through the interview process. I emailed them personally anyway and asked if ok to stay in touch, thus adding them to my network. That's a win! (14/)
A third way to network is of course to "cold email", ie send a message to someone you've never met or talked to in person (or virtually) before.

Story #3
I saw a job posted at a company that I found interesting. I again didn't know anyone there but wanted to ⬆️my chances. (15/)
The job ad said "will be part of the biochemistry team at <company> located in <city>". So I went on LinkedIn to find all employees in the company in that city using the search filters. I then used protein/purification/biochemistry/etc as keywords to narrow down more. (16/)
After an hour or so, I had 2 people, both mentioning "protein team lead" in the profile. So I sent them connection request, but importantly WITH a message. "I am a biophysics PhD, with purification experience of various soluble and membrane proteins. I wish to connect to.. (17/)
..ask about the role in your team, thank you"

After 2 weeks, one of them accepted. I then setup a time for a video chat, told her about my expertise, asked about the job etc., thus establishing a "connection". Then when I applied, my resume stood out because she knew me. (18/)
Thus I did get the interview, and later an offer.

And that's how networking can help one find professional contacts, learn about different jobs and potentially get you a job too! I'll add more to the thread later on why, and some more on how. (19/)
Circling back a bit to story #2. I really like this one because it shows the power of social media as a way to grab attention. Our email inboxes today, whether you're a student or a professor, are overflowing. If an email comes from a unknown name, (20/)

the chances are - given any humans time is limited - you'll look at it super quick, ignore it and move on. UNLESS your subject is ridiculously eye catchy, which isn't easy. So alternate ways to catch someone's attention is necessary, which is why I like using social media (21/)
It is time consuming, no question. One needs to invest time over many weeks to slowly build that impact and have many fruitful, engaging conversations with the other person to make them follow you and open up their DMs which are far less likely to be spammed than inboxes. (22/)
A related thing would be how you write your first direct communication (be it email or DM or anything) will determine chances of a successful convert. Shouldn't come across as too eager, or needy, or too pandering too. And most importantly, should be short and to the point (23/)
Long winding messages are a big let down - remember how we said earlier any single individual's time is limited? It's said more than 50% of audience in a 1h talk will decide by 7min mark if rest of the talk is worth listening to. Same for emails or any other communication! (24/)
This takes practice, trial and error. I took many months and many failed tries to slowly but surely improve. For instance, the social media story #2 was a successful instance, but behind it lay probably 15-20 unsuccessful ones. (25/)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ganesh Kadamur

Ganesh Kadamur Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @iamgkadam

26 Mar
While this is indeed a hugely mutated form of #SARSCoV2 when compared to the "original" sequence from the Wuhan patient, its a bit exaggerated to say this as evidence of any evolutionary rate. Tanazania, and all Africa's, level of infections is likely far underdetected after all
With little understanding of the level of underdetection, could be easily be a couple immunocompromised hosts + few transmissions. Or The 18907 V->F is in nsp14 and might impact Rdrp proofreading. All said, any claims on immune evasion/transmissibility are only hypotheses now
However, such data also shows the power of genomic sequence surveillance as much as possible to both understand the underlying biology and prepare for potential public health ramifications.

Its also easily misused for fear mongering - one thing to stay guarded against.
Read 6 tweets
26 Jan
Colour me biased but very little has been said about India and it's absolute squashing of (reported) cases in media overall, Western and otherwise, afaik. It's quite something for a densely populated state to reach 100k/day then go down this well, clearly lots to learn (1/)
Sure there's underreporting, but if you argue that, then the peak looks even worse which makes this even more amazing IMHO. No more huge reports of any hospitals being stressed, so this just has to be real (2/)
First hand exp, can say people back on streets, shops open - many offices still shut, but public transport ~normal crowds yet no resurgence. Winter in the north is as cold as UK, yet no resurgence there either, so not just weather (3/)
Read 20 tweets
7 Jan
For anyone, just *anyone*, again asking if immunity to CoV2 persists, hope this assuages all fears. An astounding yes is the answer. Absolutely just as one would have expected.
Wish the media brouhaha over waning immunity and antibody titers by immuno armchair experts could have been avoided. All that mental stress, public confusion, for what? Just let science do it's job. Please.

Same goes for new variants and "vaccines will be ineffective" and more.
This is not to say vaccines will *always* be effective. It is with high confidence that I say that they'll continue to be effective, but that is not 100% confidence. It is ~99%, and that is because we are still doing more experiments to make that 100% and that data will come soon
Read 4 tweets
19 Dec 20
@Billy__Grove @KernNoris @KrutikaKuppalli @itosettiMD_MBA @Moderna Mutations are completely random, there's no rhyme or reason behind them. Only the ones that are similar/better than original will survive, rest will be completed out (Darwin's survival of fittest). (1/)
@Billy__Grove @KernNoris @KrutikaKuppalli @itosettiMD_MBA @Moderna But what can happen over time as a virus gets more virulent, which is to it's advantage one would think, is that at one point, it'll become so virulent, ie disease causing, that the host would become sicker sooner so transmission to next individual becomes lesser likely (2/)
@Billy__Grove @KernNoris @KrutikaKuppalli @itosettiMD_MBA @Moderna And because viruses need hosts (us) to make copies, there's a cliff of fitness after which it is to the virus' disadvantage to keep getting "better" at causing disease. This is when the virus will naturally fade away. (3/)
Read 4 tweets
1 May 20
A (very long) thread on testing, the current scenario, and what ails us from testing more.

TL;DR version - unlikely to be able to do mass-scale testing w status quo. Need to experiment w currently avl test, or develop radically new tests. (1/n)
The WHO mantra has been "Test, test and test"+"test, track and trace". Test=genetic test btw, not serology. Great idea, and I'd say thats how China, Korea managed to keep the lid on. BUT they caught it early, so worked. Why are other countries struggling to ramp up tests? (2/n)
For contact tracing to work, you need to identify every last case. Easier when you have fewer cases ("catch cases early! stop the spread!!" sounds familiar?). Else, there's way too many silent, asymptomatic spreaders to track. So, end up having to test most/full populations (3/n)
Read 22 tweets
5 Apr 20
Starting a thread for new #SARSCoV2 ideas that we have been brainstorming amongst friends. Calling for inputs, suggestions and help getting someone to try developing in the lab if it makes sense.

First one now is a yeast/bacteria based diagnostic test

#sciencetwitter
One main constraint in current RTPCR/serology tests is supply of physical materials (RNA extraction reagents etc) and trained personnel. Need POC quick tests. What about a microbe that gives a colorimetric readout? Interested? Read on..
The virus uses both ACE2 (receptor) and TMPRSS2 (protease) to enter human cells. Presumably, and this I dont know for sure, the virus is bound to both simultaneously (atleast for some fraction of time). Critical to the idea Image
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!