Here are the 9 provisions they’re challenging in the suit… 🧵
1. Requiring photo ID submission with a VBM request. This rule will harm elderly, poor & minority voters the most since they’re the LEAST likely to have ID. Studies have shown that 25% of Black voters do NOT currently have valid government photo ID, compared to 11% of all voters.
2. Banning mobile voting, except in cases of emergencies. In 2020, Fulton County—where 44% of residents are Black—turned to mobile voting to mitigate long lines. The new ban will disproportionately affect Black voters and will inevitably drive up wait times at the polls.
3. Requiring ballot boxes to only be available during normal business hours. Black adults are more likely to work multiple jobs compared to other groups. Eliminating options of voting before and after normal business hours burdens Black working voters more than others.
4. Banning election officials from sending out unsolicited VBM applications. The state sent out VBM apps in 2020, which helped lead to record turnout. Black voters used VBM at higher rates than other groups. Eliminating access to VBM would harm Black voters more in GA.
5. Banning organizations from sending VBM requests to voters & engaging in ballot collection. Many grassroots voter organizations in the Peach State focus on Black communities, like the plaintiffs. Stopping community voter mobilization efforts would affect Black voters the most.
6. Banning people from giving food/drink to voters waiting in line. Black voters in Georgia must often endure long wait times at the polls. A study found that the average wait time to vote in 90% white neighborhoods was 6 mins., while in 90% Black neighborhoods it was 51 mins.
Banning food and drink only increases the burden on voters. In the June 2020 primary, some GA voters waited 4+ hours in line in the summer heat to cast a ballot. The ability to hand out food/drink made it physically possible for people to stay in line and vote safely.
7. Almost entirely banning out-of-precinct voting. Black voters in GA are more likely than white voters to move within their county and vote at a different local precinct than assigned. Banning OOP voting would result in more Black voters’ ballots being thrown out.
8. The ability to file unlimited claims challenging the validity of another person’s voter eligibility. Any Georgian can now file as many challenges as they want, questioning another Georgian’s right to vote. The accused Georgian must…
...appear in front of their local board of registrar almost immediately after the challenge is filed to prove their eligibility or risk disenfranchisement. The law will almost certainly discriminate against voters of color the most and force an undue burden on them.
9. Shortening runoff election voting. The law reduces mandatory early voting in runoff elections from 3 weeks to 5 DAYS & eliminates weekend voting. Minority voters disproportionately use weekend voting, and any reduction in those hours will suppress their voting accessibility.
The provisions of the bill affect Black and other minority voters the most in Georgia. Taken all together it’s very clear to see that this bill has one goal: to suppress the rights of minority voters.
#SB202 is the Big Lie signed into law and cynically targets minority voters in Georgia. It is racist—and it cannot stand. #gapol
🚨ALERT: There are now THREE voting rights lawsuits challenging #SB202 in Georgia. All three cases make crystal clear that the law would hit minority voters the hardest. Check out the complaints and learn more about who brought each suit... #gapol mini-🧵
"[T]he grab bag of voting restrictions that populate SB 202 make clear that the Bill was animated by an impermissible goal of restricting voting." democracydocket.com/cases/georgia-…
ICYMI: 5 major Georgia companies have NOT outright condemned voter suppression bills #HB531 and #SB241, despite growing pressure from community activists. Take a look at who these companies are and what their statements say🧵⤵️
.@aflac released a statement calling for “secure voting while preserving election integrity”—language that parrots the baseless voter fraud claims made by Trump and Republicans. Make no mistake: these bills do not stop fraud—they stop young people and people of color from voting.
.@CocaCola has long highlighted its activism in the Civil Rights Movement and its backing of the National Center for Civil and Human Rights. Yet, they've failed to condemn voter suppression legislation that poses a direct affront to the very issues they claim to care about.
🎓THREAD: College students make up nearly 20 million eligible voters across the country and are often the target of voter suppression, especially students who move to another state for school. Let’s break down the ins and outs of student voting⤵️
✅Starting with the basics: College students can register to vote using their campus address. In 1979, #SCOTUS affirmed in Symm v. United States that blocking college students from using their school address to register to vote violated the 26th Amendment.
The 26th Amendment, ratified in 1971, lowered the federal voting age to 18 and prohibited voter discrimination based on age. Voting laws targeting college students usually incorporate some aspect of age, so Symm fell under the 26th.🗳
🚨SOON: At 12:00 PM ET the House Administration Committee will meet about a petition for the #IA02 2020 congressional race. We'll be live-tweeting the meeting on this thread. Before the meeting starts, get the facts on the situation below⤵️
The 2020 #IA02 congressional race was extremely close after GOP candidate Marianette Miller-Meeks was certified as the winner by 6 votes. Democratic candidate Rita Hart contested the results under the 1969 Federal Contested Elections Act, claiming 22 legal votes were not counted.
Hart filed a petition with the House Administration Committee who oversees contest election adjudication. The committee is chaired by Democratic Representative Zoe Lofgren of #CA19. Miller-Meeks was provisionally seated as the #IA02 representative until the contest is settled.
🚨ALERT: FIVE GOP Senators have announced that they will NOT seek re-election in 2022. In many of these states, Republicans have already proven they’ll suppress voters in order to win.
See for yourself👇
RETIREE: Senator Roy Blunt of Missouri
For decades, Missouri Republicans have tried to suppress the vote through the enactment of onerous voting ID laws. Take a look at this 2018 lawsuit👇democracydocket.com/state/missouri/
North Carolina is no stranger to bad voting laws. Thirteen different lawsuits tell this story, ranging from Republican challenges to early voting, attacks on vote by mail and aggressive gerrymandering👇 democracydocket.com/state/north-ca…
🚨ALERT: The biggest voting rights case of the term is headed to #SCOTUS TOMORROW, Brnovich v. DNC. Here’s a breakdown of how this Arizona case got started and what’s at stake. THREAD🧵:
This case started in 2013 with Shelby County v. Holder, when Arizona was released from the preclearance requirement and the DOJ/D.C. Federal District Court no longer had to approve changes to their voting laws. After Shelby, AZ started passing voter suppression laws. (1/12)
One law made it a felony to return someone’s ballot, a practice known as ballot collection. Ballot collection is used in Hispanic communities, where activists use it for GOTV drives, and in Native American communities, where it can be harder to access the postal service. (2/12)