This is our first statement on the #JCPAct, a looming disaster for the right to share online.

If you think fake news is bad now, just wait—#JCPA creates a monopolistic pipeline to put Facebook $ into Fox News hands & limit who can share news online.

Rupert Murdoch is drooling. A bright orange rectangle with black text that reads "I
The #JCPAct speeds up the decline of journalism+rise of disinfo, while pretending to do the opposite. Under it, online platforms would pay big news orgs for linking to them or using their content in some undefined way.

Funneling internet $ to rich propagandists like Murdoch.
The premise of #JCPAct is that News Corp, Fox News, all the biggest peddlers of disinfo in news, need a special law to link up and collude more with Facebook, the biggest peddler of disinfo online—using their power to crush local journalism in the process.
So the #JCPAct’s math is basically:

Facebook & Google $$
+
Fox News disinfo
+
News Corp having a bigger monopoly

= less disinfo & more local independent journalism

Yeah, right. 🙄
The effects of the #JCPAct fine print are as disastrous for the internet as a special Big Tech-Murdoch circle-jerk.
This law as-written could lead to the end of fair use of news content online—it could even make posting a link to a news story a copyright violation.
Fair use is what lets @iamjohnoliver mock Tucker Carlson using footage from Fox, what lets you make a meme of a news reporter getting attacked by a seagull. #JCPAct could undermine fair use by making users or platforms pay for a license before they even can quote a headline.
Some groups think #JCPAct is a “pound of flesh” from Big Tech, when really it’s pounds of cash for the monopolistic corporations pushing the bill.
It is government mandated payouts to share content online—in other words, a link tax.

#JCPA
IS
A
LINK
TAX
Bc lobbyists are trained to bark at "link tax," to be clear #JCPAct doesn’t impose a “per link fee” like a toll that is paid every time a link is clicked—it just turns internet news into Spotify, where corrupt law gives the biggest actors all the $$$$ and lets the rest starve.
How does all this harm smaller, independent news orgs? It lets the News Corps of the world get even bigger and collude with Big Tech under a special antitrust exemption—that’s right, under #JCPAct News Corp can become a BIGGER monopoly.
Adding insult to injury, the act's fantasyland nondiscrimination clause completely discounts how negotiations work—especially the power the biggest news outlets hold. #JCPAct leaves independent news out in the cold, creating a closed system where only massive corps can negotiate.
Media coverage of #JCPAct so far is pure lobbyist talking points parroted by the same monopolistic news orgs that stand to benefit most from squashing the competition and getting free money from Big Tech.

We need to kill this bill, but it’s going to be an uphill battle.
We’re gearing up to raise hell about #JCPAct because it is a threat to a free and open internet, and independent journalism everywhere.
If you’re ready for us to spray Zuck and Murdoch with a firehose, RT and help us pay the water bill at fftf.link/donatejcpact

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Fight for the Future

Fight for the Future Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @fightfortheftr

24 Dec 20
The US government just launched a sneak-attack on our financial privacy rights, proposing a new rule to let the Treasury track cryptocurrency transactions. And if you think this doesn’t affect you just because you don’t own #Bitcoin, think again.

Here’s why ...

1/12
Imagine you buy a new car. And because you bought a new car, your bank has to give the federal government information that allows them to track EVERY PURCHASE YOU’VE MADE IN YOUR ENTIRE LIFE … without a warrant.

That’s what’s going on here.

2/12
FinCEN — a bureau within the US Treasury — has proposed a new rule forcing any banks or money service businesses to keep records on all cryptocurrency transactions over $3,000 going to or from personal wallets … without a warrant.

3/12

public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2020-28437.pdf
Read 12 tweets
29 Sep 20
Amazon thinks they can create the perfect workforce by surveilling them into submission. With AI cameras, tracking devices, thermal cameras, and scanners everywhere they have made a massive investment in monitoring and control.
static1.squarespace.com/static/5e449c8…
It gets worse. Amazon employs a team of former U.S. intelligence and military agents to spy on workers. The team compiles confidential reports tracking worker organizing, media interviews, and planned protests/strikes in order to stop worker organizing
vice.com/en_us/article/…
Last week, Senators Brown and Wyden wrote a letter calling on Amazon to stop spying on their workers. A letter is a good first step but we need laws to end invasive workplace surveillance. 
brown.senate.gov/newsroom/press…
Read 7 tweets
22 Sep 20
This is despicable. Facebook's algorithm is built to stir controversy and indoctrinate the most vulnerable to extremism. We need an immediate end to algorithmic amplification and #microtargeting! #RiskyByDesign

🖋️ actionnetwork.org/petitions/face… Image
On the source of his assailants’ behavior, Howard said, “it has to be Facebook”, noting that in his own monitoring of Estacada Facebook groups during his reporting in the area, he had noticed the same rumors of antifa looters... theguardian.com/us-news/2020/s…
This is relevant because Facebook’s own internal review determined that 64% of all extremist FB group joins in 2016 were due to algorithmic recommendation, & Facebook’s rage algorithm helped the rumor go viral.
Read 4 tweets
18 Sep 20
Amy Goodman of @DemocracyNow interviews Juan González of @Public_Citizen about their new report on @amazon profiteering + price gouging during the pandemic. #InvestigateAmazon democracynow.org/2020/9/15/pand…
Key findings include:

•Amazon set prices of products during the COVID-19 pandemic to levels that would be considered violations of price gouging laws in many states.

•Amazon has misled the public, law enforcement, and policymakers about price increases during the pandemic.
• Numerous examples of price increases were found on essential products on Amazon, some as much as 1000% over the expected price.

• Amazon publicly blamed so-called third-party sellers for price increases while continuing to allow third-party sellers to increase their prices.
Read 4 tweets
15 Sep 20
This month, US courts ruled that the government's massive spying program was ILLEGAL, vindicating @Snowden for blowing the whistle on the government’s crimes. So why is this hero still exiled and living in fear of prosecution?

#PardonSnowden

1/12

For years, the US government abused the PATRIOT Act to spy on the phone calls, emails, and Internet activity of millions of Americans … without a warrant. That threatens our basic human rights and makes us all less safe.

2/12

theguardian.com/world/interact…
The government kept the public — and Congressional lawmakers — in the dark about their secret spying until @Snowden risked his safety and his freedom to reveal details about this dangerous mass surveillance program.

3/12

washingtonpost.com/world/national…
Read 12 tweets
14 Sep 20
Last night, sex workers in Oakland sent a clear message to @KamalaHarris on her home turf: her vote to advance the #EARNITAct was a betrayal.

The EARN IT Act is SESTA/FOSTA 2.0.
The good thing is that @KamalaHarris can join @Wyden in opposing this trainwreck of a bill. #NoEarnItAct

You, reading this, can tell your reps how you feel now at noearnitact.org
We are hearing that #EARNITAct sponsors may try to force the bill through the Senate this week. They are trying to be sneaky because this bill never was about exploited kids. It's about censorship and ending essential online freedoms. #Section230
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!