BS is all in Vaibhav's mind it appears, misinterpreting Raas as sexual, Lover as sexual and Gopi's devotion to Krishna as sexual. Well, a mind full of such filth can only spew more of that!
There are so many ridiculous points that I was flabbergasted where to even start.
There are so many ridiculous points that I was flabbergasted where to even start.
https://twitter.com/SaffronVaibhav/status/1378291704113991682
As I started going through his thread, there are misinterpretations after misinterpretations and deliberate misrepresentation in some cases.
This n00b thinks he can identify a Dharmacharya because "they would know Sanskrit and will be from a tradition".
This n00b thinks he can identify a Dharmacharya because "they would know Sanskrit and will be from a tradition".
Somebody please ask him how that traditional paths started in the first place and such illogical reasoning was why even Adi Shankara was ridiculed by so many others in his own lifetime. People often worship gurus after they leave but not when they are alive 😏
Vaibhav claims that Sadhguru said "Yoga is not Hindu", but misses the context completely. Sadhguru said it on the context of restricting yoga to a religious practice and wanted it to be inclusive of all faiths, but he never denied its origins from the Bharatiya culture.
And the interpretation of Darshan as Philosophy is a classical Western philosophy rookie student mistake. Sanskrit meaning of the word is to see or perceive.
But what is it's relevance in this context is for you to figure out. Perhaps some hidden 'dimension' we are missing? 😃
But what is it's relevance in this context is for you to figure out. Perhaps some hidden 'dimension' we are missing? 😃
Sadhguru spoke about Rama, Jesus and Krishna. He has said that if we simply look upon them as Gods, we will never draw inspiration from them but should see how they lived as wonderful human beings amongst us.
I don't understand what is the problem with speaking about Jesus.
I don't understand what is the problem with speaking about Jesus.
Swami Vivekananda has extensively spoken about Jesus Christ. So I guess Vaibhav is more Dharmic than Swami Vivekananda himself because now Vivekananda becomes a liberal for these people obsessed against many things 😉 
"Sadhguru has rejected the Gita" - this is a cunning connotation full of malice. Sadhguru has never said that.
In fact, he conducted an entire program on Krishna to establish the Bhakti process again and speaks extremely high of Krishna.
In fact, he conducted an entire program on Krishna to establish the Bhakti process again and speaks extremely high of Krishna.
He has only said that by merely reading the Gita or any scriptures for that matter doesn't make one elevated. It can inspire one, but such elevation can happen through personal experience only and he asks every person to be a seeker, rather than blindly believing what one reads.
Of course, it goes without saying that this Vaibhav person has a clearly misinterpreted knowledge of Dharma shastras.
Sadhguru makes clear distinction of deities who are representations of various manifestations of Brahman and the ultimate consciousness of Brahman itself.
Sadhguru makes clear distinction of deities who are representations of various manifestations of Brahman and the ultimate consciousness of Brahman itself.
Rig Veda talks of Brahman, and not the western concept of God. It was in that context that Sadhguru spoke about not having 1 God.
Half-baked knowledge and half-baked interpretation are always dangerous.
Half-baked knowledge and half-baked interpretation are always dangerous.
"Sadhguru is preaching Buddhism" - yeah sure, by talking about Shiva and Agastya muni all the time, Sadhguru seems to be doing great at preaching Buddhism 👏
Sadhguru has in fact said that Buddha explored only part of just one element of Shiva's methods and can't be compared.
Sadhguru has in fact said that Buddha explored only part of just one element of Shiva's methods and can't be compared.
And of course, Vaibhav chooses to quote about Shiva, an ISKCON guy who worships Krishna as the Supreme, over Sadhguru who claims all the time that he is just a speck of Shiva 🤦♂️
Talking of Mahashivratri as not a belief, Sadhguru says it has a scientific basis to activate your energies naturally.
So, Vaibhav conveniently ignores that and cherry picks what he wants to show. But anyone with eyes can just read the next line in that tweet.
So, Vaibhav conveniently ignores that and cherry picks what he wants to show. But anyone with eyes can just read the next line in that tweet.
People like Vaibhav write something and think no one will question them. Or he is reading too many commentaries and just mixing up his Dharmic concepts too much. Or there is deliberate scheme to spread malice and ill-will through wrong projections of what someone says 🤔
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
