Why can the Euro not attain he internatonal role that the EU economy should give it as a store of value and vehicle for transactions? Why does this matter? What can we do about it? I have just been working on this from the @Europarl_EN. Some answers in a THREAD 1/18
While € is the second most important international currency, it lags well behind the $. Over 60% of international reserves are held in $ and only a scarce 20% in €. The trend is not encouraging either: the € was more widely used as a reserve in 2002 than today (2/18) Image
The share of the € in global foreign exchange trading is also smaller by a wide margin. In this case, the $ is the leading currency, being involved in 90% of all transactions (3/18) Image
The share of the € in the stock of international debt securities has also been declining since 2005. Surprisingly, the $ has increased its share in debt securities by almost 20% since the financial crisis.The use of € in international debt markets stands now at only 22% (4/18) Image
Even more surprisingly, only 61% of our exports outside the EU and 51% of imports outside the EU are invoiced in €. Even in our day-to-day commercial operations, Europe still heavily depends on $ (5/18) Image
Now, why does it matter? Why is it important to strengthen the role of €? For two reasons. First, it would reduce our exposure to extraterritoriality effects. Second, the effectiveness of monetary policy would be enhanced. Let’s go over both reasons.(6/18)
Since the world heavily depends on the $, most int’l transactions are subject to American jurisdiction, even if the transaction does not involve the US. For instance, most banks rely on correspondent banks in NYC to buy $ to conduct international operations (7/18)
As part of its sanctions’ program, the US could unilaterally prevent States from receiving payments even if they don’t conduct operations in the US. This endangers Europe’s strategic autonomy and is well documented in this article @TheEconomist : economist.com/briefing/2020/… (8/18)
A stronger € is also important for our monetary policy. First, the more the € is used for trade, the less the pass-through to import prices after fluctuations in the exchange rate. This contributes to the ECB objective of price stability. (9/18) Image
Second, a more widely used € better enables Europe to exercise its monetary autonomy. In periods of crisis, investors prefer the safety of $ assets and hence compresses their term premia compared to € assets and affects financing conditions in the euro area (10/18)
Moreover, a monetary tightening in the US increases global demand for US assets and thus directly reduces Europe’s aggregate demand. This imposes restrictions in our rate policy ecb.europa.eu//pub/pdf/scpwp… (11/18)
Third, a strengthened € would enable larger spillbacks. For instance, a domestic interest rate cut would ease financial conditions globally and feed demand across the world, benefiting open economies, such as the European one (12/18) Image
What do we need to strengthen the €? Kindleberger identified some rules of monetary hegemony: (i) commit to open markets, (ii) provide counter-cyclical lending, (iii) ensure macroeconomic coordination and (iv) be a lender of last resort. All in all, make € a public good (13/18) Image
NextGenEU is a historic opportunity. For the 1st time, Europe has agreed on a coordinated approach to face a crisis, providing counter-cyclical spending while increasing global liquidity. Unlike 2008, the € now has an economic growth agenda w/ global spillovers (14/18)
More economic integration is however needed. Fragmentation still contributes to interest differentials, redenomination risks and doom loops. That is why @RenewEurope fights for a deepening of the Capital Markets, Economic and Monetary and Banking Unions (15/18)
Our report recognizes the necessity to set up a European safe portfolio, the empowerment of the Single Resolution Board and creating a European Deposit Insurance. I have published some proposals in this regard. You can check them here: luisgaricano.eu/proposals/two-… (16/18)
In these troubled times, we have potential to take steps towards strengthening our monetary leadership. We are reliable partners committed to free trade, contributing to global fiscal stimulus and liquidity needs while increasing our internal coordination and coherence (17/18)
Europe should not waste this opportunity to make € a global public good. This is the message we hope to conveyed for the European Parliament to the Council. You can find our full report here: europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document… (18/18)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Luis Garicano

Luis Garicano Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lugaricano

7 Apr
¿Está en riesgo el fondo de recuperación 🇪🇺 tras la última decisión del Tribunal Constitucional 🇩🇪? ¿Qué implica que haya retrasado su puesta en marcha? ¿Cuándo llegarán los cerca de 140.000 millones que le corresponden a 🇪🇸? HILO 1/11 Image
A diferencia de cualquier país, los Tratados UE dicen que como regla general la 🇪🇺 no puede endeudarse. Pero vino el Covid y se entendió que era necesario dotarse de medios adicionales para paliar los efectos económicos de la pandemia 2/11
Lo que había sido hasta ahora imposible (acordaos de lo que costó poner de acuerdo a Rutte y 🇦🇹🇩🇰🇸🇪🇫🇮) se hizo de pronto realidad: 🇪🇺 dejaba atrás la austeridad, apostando por las reformas e inversiones que apuntaran al futuro con €750.000 millones para la reconstrucción 3/11
Read 11 tweets
17 Mar
Abro hilo con evidencia para explicar por qué digo que los rescates de la SEPI huelen que apestan.

Preparad una pinza para taparos la nariz porque vais a encontrar el hedor insoportable.
1/10
Ante la falta de información y transparencia, los artículos de prensa que critican la situación se multiplican. Pero la información oficial sobre las ayudas brilla por su ausencia. Ni la SEPI, ni el gobierno, parecen inmutarse… #TurbocapitalismoDeAmiguetes 2/
Por el momento, tres ayudas concedidas, tres escándalos abiertos:
1.Air Europa, €475 millones
2.Duro Felguera, €120 millones
3.Plus Ultra, €53 millones
3/10
Read 13 tweets
16 Mar
Los Europeos somos IDIOTAS. Millones de personas han recibido la vacuna sin experiemntar trombos, y no hay ninguna relación causal entre la vacuna y esta enfermedad. Y los efectos de NO vacunarse son, a menudo (un 1%) mortales. Sigue la evidencia👇elpais.com/sociedad/2021-…
En esa franja de edad, hay muchas trombosis normalmente fesemi.org/sites/default/…

“la incidencia del primer episodio de Trombosis Venosa Profunda (TVP) en la población general es de 0,5/1.000 habitantes. Este dato podría suponer la existencia en España de 20.000 TVP al año."
"La incidencia aumentó a entre 2 y 7 por 1000 al año entre los mayores de 70 años", o sea entre 2000 y 7000 al año por millón, o sea entre 38 y 140 a la semana en esa población worldthrombosisday.org/assets/_contro…
Read 7 tweets
1 Mar
¿Qué dice el dictamen del Consejo de Estado? Nos lo hemos leído para que no te lo tengas que leer:

1) No es acertado que la simplificación se acompañe de una significativa reducción de los mecanismos de control previstos para garantizar una recta asignación de los fondos (p.52)
2) No puede emitirse una opinión favorable sobre las excepciones en materia de autorización previa, a la exigencia de informes preceptivos o incluso al ejercicio de la función interventora (pg. 52)
3) El Consejo de Estado considera que no debe establecerse como regla general la exclusión de la fiscalización previa y después introducir la posibilidad de establecer excepciones a esa regla general a través de un acuerdo del Consejo de Ministros (pg. 55).
Read 11 tweets
9 Feb
Certains économistes, particulièrement en France, prônent l’annulation de la dette détenue par l’@ecb. Ceci serait une folie politique, sans rationnel économique, et qui donnerait des ailes aux faucons alors que l'ecb fait ce qu'il faut. Mon discours face à Mme. @Lagarde 1/17
En quelques mots:
👉l’annulation de la dette comporte de nombreux risques,
👉elle est contraire aux traités de l'UE,
👉et tout cela, pour aucun avantages économiques !
Analysons chacun des arguments 👇 2/17
Argument #1: De nombreux risques associés
L'annulation de la dette nuirait gravement à la politique monétaire, qui perdrait sa crédibilité car elle donnerait l'impression de se lancer dans le financement des déficits publics 3/17
Read 17 tweets
8 Feb
Hoy, junto a @dlopezsalido, escribo en el @el_pais para explicar por qué la anulación de la deuda pública en manos del BCE es una mala idea: con muchos riesgos, ilegal y, encima, sin beneficio económico.

Abro un hilo explicando por qué 1/12
elpais.com/opinion/2021-0…
Argumento 1.: La cancelación dañaría gravemente el funcionamiento de la política monetaria, que perdería credibilidad ya que generaría la percepción de que los bancos centrales se embarcan en la financiación de déficit público 2/12
Además del daño de percepción (clave para un banco central), también se verían dañados los mecanismos de transmisión monetaria del BCE para controlar la inflación en el futuro, al haberse desecho de los activos que podía vender para retirar progresivamente la liquidez 3/12
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!