#COVID19 and a tale of two gyms in a 🧵
Gyms are high risk situations since you are exerting and breathing in a lot more than you would usually do. Everything else remaining same, a gym could be 5 times more risky than a classroom 1/
3) Staff and clients got infected, they unknowingly carried the virus to a wide range of locations - grocery stores, homes, and workplaces
Final result 419 cases and counting
4) "195 clients and staff of the ... Gym ... have tested positive for the virus."
So, about an equal number of people infected beyond the gym as well, as of now
5) "primary cases are believed to have spread the virus to some 36 workplaces, including restaurants, grocery stores, offices, retail stores and construction sites"
all from one outbreak spot
6) "some clients who allegedly refused to get tested, despite developing symptoms or being exposed" - not the ideal behaviour but would we not prefer to not have the outbreak in the first place?
7) "...some clients weren’t respecting health measures. ... commented on the lax mask-wearing in the gym"
"... signs outlining the rules as well as Plexiglas barriers and hand sanitizer,... there were hardly any employees on the floor to enforce the rules."
8) So, once again, the futility of Plexiglas...
Ultimately, is it all going to be blamed on behaviour of the users, in other words, contextual spread? (h/t @PrasadKasibhat1)
9) "Dr. Gaston De Serres, an epidemiologist with the province’s public health institute, “gyms can be higher risk settings because people breathe heavily and expel more droplets.
he believes the degree to which people follow health measures is a more important factor"
10) I have no idea what droplets are being expelled due to breathing heavily. Why not just say you are likely to inhale more of the viral loaded particles since you are inhaling more as well?
11) Agreed user behaviour was not ideal but do we have better models for them? No. We continue to expound on the magical force fields from Plexiglas.
12) Gym owner believes he did all he could - "even though he questions the government's action plan, he has respected the sanitary measures from the beginning, first for the safety of his clients, but also out of obligation."
13) Now a starkly different case due to better controls and preparedness in place insider.com/how-gym-preven…
14) "Dr. Linsey Marr, an expert in airborne viral transmission, is a member of the gym, and worked with the owner on gym policies to reduce the risks for athletes there" @linseymarr to the rescue and kudos to the owner for listening to her and going beyond govt. dictum
15) "Owner Velvet Minnick implemented strict distancing, ventilation, and hygiene policies. At least 10 feet between athletes and lots of open doors"
Yes, that is 10 instead of the usual 6 feet
18) Just for reference, outdoors have around 415 ppm. So, steps were taken to keep the gym indoors at about the same level of air circulation and ventilation as outdoors!
19) Ventilate, distance, and wear masks when possible. More exertion? Increase the above measures regarding distance and ventilation. The darn thing is #airborne and this understanding helps us mitigate better instead of having more incidents like the first Gym. \end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Situational #Airborne is not a real thing if the so-called situations are the norm! A 🧵 of these situations, likely to contain many places or situations you too frequent 1/
2) In a long bus journey - quite normal for many people commuting between home and work places
What do we mean by #UseAirbornePrecautions? There are clear guidelines in health care settings, but what do we mean by it for the public? A 🧵 of 🧵(met-thread) on this. Strap in, this will be long 1/
2) First, this is not the first #airborne problem we have faced, and it won't be the last. And not all of them are exotic pathogens. Some could be as mundane as dust, smoke, pollens, volatile/semi-volatile organic compounds. They are all around our living space
3) Not all #airborne troubles are created equal. For example, I am a lot more allergic to cigarette smoke than incense. This varies from person to person and trouble to trouble. Some do not have any smell and can still be a "headache".
Twice in as many days, again a 🧵 examining a specific document. This time, I am not very impressed with the document. The document being -
"Should all healthcare workers caring for patients with COVID-19 wear FFP3?" ips.uk.net/post/news/shou…
1/n
2) Conflicts/Bias - I do not know the author of the document, and I am seriously biased against messy reviews of selective evidence.
3) The title is as a question. My observation - If you are asking this question, you already have an answer in your head "NO" and your entire effort is going to be to justify that answer.
HCWs deserve the best protection available, period.
2) Document entitled "Roadmap to improve and ensure good indoor ventilation in the context of COVID-19"
- very specific and focused name though in the document they also state that these steps will have long term benefits, non-Covid ones as well
3) Conflict declaration - The Advisory committee that helped craft this, among them there are people I know personally and some are my former supervisors, people who taught me what I know about indoor air, so my view could be biased
In July 2020, just as #Singapore was starting to open up after the #CircuitBreaker, the National Research Foundation of Singapore decided to fund projects that would look at life in the new normal - opening up while mitigating #COVID19
2/ I was then working @CREATE_NRF, with Berkeley Education Alliance for Research in Singapore (#BEARS) and we were fortunate enough to be funded for our idea
3/ "AUTOMATED DECONTAMINATION OF WORKSPACES USING UVC COUPLED WITH OCCUPANCY DETECTION"
The idea was, UVC can harm occupants but over the past years, occupancy sensing has also improved by leaps and bounds