Cathie:

With all due respect, allow me to make some important comments below.



👇👇👇
“Bitcoin could be today’s “gold standard”, increasing purchasing power!”

Let’s put aside the ‘Bitcoin replacing gold’ discussion for a moment...

Your point above may be one of *the most* inflationary I’ve seen in a while.
The whole idea of the gold standard was to:

-Prevent the dilution of fiat currencies
-Keep the monetary system pegged to a hard asset

And, most importantly:

Allow the consumer to maintain its buying power over time.

Is that what’s going on today?
The Fed is expanding the monetary base like never before.

The government is literally handling money to citizens.

Fiscal deficits are the largest in 70 years with no end in sight.

The Fed is at the mercy of a broke government.
It has to continue to pumping liquidity in the system to suppress the cost of borrowing money for two main reasons:

1) Allow the government to continue spending as much as it has

2) Enable investors to justify buying assets at record prices
As a result, people are hoarding hard assets (Bitcoin, commodities, art, etc).

In my opinion, there is absolutely nothing deflationary with this macro dynamic.
Second point.

The early-1900s comparison:

You are correct. The US economy did go through a period of ‘good deflationary’ innovations.
However, that never prevented us from having the second most inflationary decade of the 20th century, the 1910s.

Not even the gold standard, an anti-inflationary factor, helped to tamp down consumer prices.
Interesting enough, back then, the same ideas about new technological advancements being able to prevent consumer prices from rising were also prominent.
To be clear, it’s not my goal to be a doom and gloom nor to disrespect your knowledge of history.

In fact, we see eye to eye in most technological trends and advancements — especially when it comes to the biotechnology industry.
On the other hand, our macro views are very different.

With the massive combination of today’s fiscal and monetary policies, I believe there is a great probability that we could be entering another long-term inflationary environment.
We had two important inflationary periods in the last century, the 1910s and 1970s.

Both times were marked by unique macro and geopolitical developments in which the median monthly YoY Consumer Prices Index (CPI) stood above 6% for an entire decade.
The 1940s also had some sporadic spikes in CPI but, different than what most like to think, consumer prices did not consistently persist at high levels for the full 10-years.
These inflationary periods were also marked by exceptionally low equity returns.

From '10 to '20, the Dow Jones had delivered a 0.91% ARR.

Similarly, from '70 to '80 stocks delivered a 0.47% ARR.

Considering inflation, real returns were negative for both decades.
With that, I rest my case.

Here is a letter we wrote recently with a more in-depth and detailed explanation of our macro views.

crescat.net/march-research…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Otavio (Tavi) Costa

Otavio (Tavi) Costa Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TaviCosta

2 Apr
Two diverging schools of macro thoughts are prevalent today.

One calls for a “Roaring 20s” redux while the other believes in a forthcoming liquidity crisis.

Both narratives have valid points and flaws.

We find ourselves right in between the two.

Let me elaborate.

👇👇👇
The central argument of the reflationary thesis is that a pent-up demand from consumers will likely cause explosive growth in the economy similar to the early 1920s.

To be fair, financial conditions for US households have significantly improved.
As shown in the chart below, their net worth is rising at the fastest pace since 1953, which also includes the largest wealth increase by the bottom 50% in history.
Read 36 tweets
28 Feb
The Fed is trapped.

Let’s dive in deeper.

Thread 👇👇👇
The year is just getting started and US fiscal deficits already reached another record.

Now at its worst level in 70 years.

The current fiscal spending path will lead to record Treasury issuance this year.
In March of 2020, lawmakers passed the $2.2 trillion CARES Act bill.

Then, an additional $900 billion of stimulus in December.
Read 36 tweets
30 Jan
The largest wealth transfer in history.

Time for a thread 👇👇👇
Today’s mix of monetary and fiscal policies are having a very different economic impact then we saw post the GFC.

Back then, deflationary forces were exacerbated by a brutal wealth loss problem.

Especially the lower classes.

They lost over 84% of their net worth from '07-'11.
This time we are seeing the complete opposite.

Lower classes just increased their wealth at the highest annual amount in the history of the data.
Read 25 tweets
26 Dec 20
The Spanish flu of 1919 serves as a roadmap for the current macro environment.

Thread 👇👇👇
Similar to today, the outbreak of the pandemic severely limited the industrial capacity of the economy and led to a major supply shock in raw materials.

Commodities became rare assets and, despite still muted aggregate demand, inflationary forces started to accelerate again.
To note, the rise of wholesale prices became a global phenomenon.

Grocery stores began hoarding inventories to sell at higher prices, forcing governments to intervene and criminalize these actions to avoid an even larger hit to the consumer.
Read 18 tweets
17 Oct 20
Something is out of place.

There is a massive divergence between retail sales vs. coincident indicators.

If it's all driven by fiscal stimulus....

Why aren’t we seeing a major turn in economic activity? Image
Are strong retail sales due to higher prices rather than volume?

Except for the GFC:

Capacity utilization is well below or at similar levels reached at the worst part of all recessions of the last 53 years.

Aggregate supply remains largely constrained. Image
While it's not a component of this retail sales index, the auto industry would be a great example.

Car makers are extremely behind in annual production due to the pandemic.

12-trailing months production just reached its lowest level in history. Image
Read 4 tweets
21 Jun 20
Fairly simple.

All we need is 5 or 6 more record breaking nonfarm payroll gains to justify today’s valuations.
Hard to see the labor markets going back to normal any time soon.

Capacity utilization has barely picked up in May.

Still at its second worst print in 53 years!
Companies are also reluctant to spend capital.

Forward looking CAPEX estimates aren’t any better.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!