AG Ashutosh Kumbhakoni begins submissions. Submits an order of the #SupremeCourt where the issue was can prisoners be shifted without court’s permissions. This was about undertrial prisoners.
AG: The appeals were filed by State of Maharashtra. The respondents sought transfer from Arthur road jail to another jail and then back to Arthur road.
AG: Request was transfer was proceeded on two distinct grounds. There was over crowding and problems of management. And that some prisoners were not required to be detained in the prison.
AG: IN short it appears that it has to be judicial order of the court. The Court will apply on case to cases basis, the prison has to be heard, and then reason have to be applied.
So then we cannot do it overnight.
CJ: So then what you have sought in your affidavit?
Sr Adv Mihir Desai appearing for an intervening NGO submits: Along with my recommendations, there are two other organisations working for prisoners have sent me recommendations. These are people working with prisoners. I have sent them to the AG. Those may also be considered.
Court: Are they intervening? Are they filing application?
Desai: No they sent to me.
Court: Then you act as amicus and compile and send to AG.
Court: We have said in the order that if for equitable distribution of prisoners, you want to transfer prisoners, you can apply to the Magistrate, and we have expressed hope that he will consider the same on its merit.
Advocate Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad welcomes guests and dignitaries: Today we bid virtual farewell to CJI SA Bobde. This court has not closed for a single day on account of the pandemic. Justice dispensation did not stop
The Karnataka HC to shortly hear a case registered suo motu after it received two letters highlighting various difficulties faced by COVID-19 positive patients in the State.
Earlier in the day, the Bench pulled up state authorities for non-compliance of its order directing State to ensure #Nagpur gets 10000 vials of #remdesivirinjection.
#Breaking Karnataka HC refuses to entertain two IAs seeking to postpone elections of local authorities in the State, scheduled to be held on April 27 amid COVID-19.
Karnataka HC was hearing a case registered suo motu after noting that in large number of municipal corporations, elections not being held as per Constitutional mandate.
ORDER: Firstly, we must note here that intervenor wants drastic relief of postponing elections for 10 local authorities. We fail to understand under which provision of law, intervenor can seek relief of stay.
Advocate Abhishek Gupta for Deep Sidhu : I'll show firstly that the two FIRs are identical, allegations are similar. In the first FIR, I have been granted regular bail.
Need and timing of arrest and the arrest per se is in glaring breach of Article 21. The bail order was communicated on Saturday, around 1-1:30 pm, this arrest was effected : Gupta