#BombayHighCourt to continue hearing the plea seeking door-to-door #COVID19 vaccination for citizens above 75 years of age and those who are specially-abled or bed-ridden.
Bench of Chief Justice and Justice GS Kulkarni ask Advocate General Ashutosh Kumbhakoni appearing for State how will the vaccination programme be conducted with the new guidelines #BreakTheChain of April 13.
Court: We have read that there are no vaccinations at the centres.
What is the ground situation?
AG requests for permission to let a doctor speak for clarification on the issue. He submits only two companies are manufacturing. And they are trying to ramp up production.
Court: Yes but from May 1, there were be people above 18 coming for vaccination.
AG: We have stick for 3-4 days.
Court: But what after May 1. There are people taking vaccination for the second time too.
Court: Other countries have advanced. I know in LA they have a drive through vaccines. Something like could be thought for us.. We have to advance and move with time. There are senior citizens, specially abled.
ASG submits that if there is co-morbidity, then there is risk after vaccination.
Court: This is choosing between devil and deep sea. You do not want co-morbid patients to be given without supervision, but because they cannot come to the centres, then you want them to suffer?
Court: You talk of refrigerators, there are refrigerators in vehicles. There are ICUs in ambulance, you cannot keep a refrigerator?
Advocate Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad welcomes guests and dignitaries: Today we bid virtual farewell to CJI SA Bobde. This court has not closed for a single day on account of the pandemic. Justice dispensation did not stop
The Karnataka HC to shortly hear a case registered suo motu after it received two letters highlighting various difficulties faced by COVID-19 positive patients in the State.
Earlier in the day, the Bench pulled up state authorities for non-compliance of its order directing State to ensure #Nagpur gets 10000 vials of #remdesivirinjection.
#Breaking Karnataka HC refuses to entertain two IAs seeking to postpone elections of local authorities in the State, scheduled to be held on April 27 amid COVID-19.
Karnataka HC was hearing a case registered suo motu after noting that in large number of municipal corporations, elections not being held as per Constitutional mandate.
ORDER: Firstly, we must note here that intervenor wants drastic relief of postponing elections for 10 local authorities. We fail to understand under which provision of law, intervenor can seek relief of stay.
Advocate Abhishek Gupta for Deep Sidhu : I'll show firstly that the two FIRs are identical, allegations are similar. In the first FIR, I have been granted regular bail.
Need and timing of arrest and the arrest per se is in glaring breach of Article 21. The bail order was communicated on Saturday, around 1-1:30 pm, this arrest was effected : Gupta