My earliest work in crypto was all around $BTC at @ARKInvest, and while I focus on a number of networks these days, I’m still fascinated by #Bitcoin.
I’m confident $BTC pulls through here and on a 5-10 year time frame keep my eyes on gold parity: $10T+ network value, ~$500K per coin.
This is not new thinking. At @ARKInvest we dimensioned these scenarios back in 2015, and while parameters change, the core conviction in $BTC hasn’t changed: research.ark-invest.com/hubfs/2_Downlo…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Right now it’s murmured that “decentralized governance” slows down decision-making.
What if that’s a temporary truth?
Perhaps we haven’t standardized the right forms of “distributed governance” that accelerate group decision-making through flexible consensus rules.
Watching some of the boutique investment DAOs — which can out execute traditional investment firms due to lightweight gov structures 👀 — this distributed & accelerated decision-making is already possible in some contexts.
While “fair distribution” is a normative judgment, it flows from what we see as a consensus belief within crypto: creating level playing-fields where everyone has a chance at financial sovereignty.
If a small group of insiders regularly take ~half of the fully-diluted upside (which is common), we’re seriously kneecapping the redistributive effects of this technology in order to make a handful of people obscenely rich.
For a while, skeptics asked what $DCR's raison d'être was.
Sure, @placeholdervc had put out that "Decred’s killer feature is good governance, and with good governance, you can have any feature you want," but what feature(s) was @decredproject providing the world?
IMO the turning point for people realizing @decredproject's ability to bring valuable services to the world was #DCRDEX, which has seen rapid uptake as a privacy-preserving, hard-money #DEX: dex.decred.org