I’m dismayed by ongoing silence re: misinformation in #TheSocialDilemma.
For instance, the film uses the graph below to “prove” more iPhones → more teen suicides.
Actual fact: Social media affects teen depression as much as (drumroll please) EATING POTATOES.
I’ll explain 👇
The film presses a causal link between the rise of social media apps on phones (2009) & the rise in teen suicide. For any parent watching, it’s a HORRIFYING image.
But, if social media is the cause, there should be a rise in suicides *wherever* teens use it.
There isn't.
First, the rise in teen suicide is mostly an American problem.
Of course, even one death is too many—but, for almost all other nations, the trend lines don't point to concerning correlations.
Look at this more nuanced graph from the USA.
Yes, teen suicide is rising in the USA (up from record lows). But if social media is the cause—or even a leading cause—it should be rising *everywhere* teens use it.
It isn’t.
This uptick is coming mainly from RURAL America.
Here’s another graph, showing suicide trends in America’s heartland. “Social media” by itself doesn’t come close to explaining these disparities. What else is going on?
Singling out social media as the cause of suicide ignores so many important factors, like access to mental health services, economic disparities, and (most obviously) the fact that 2009 was the year that the number of guns overtook the number of people in the USA:
On top of that, the % of LGBTQ youth who say they've attempted suicide dropped 25% since 2009. Why? What if social media helps these teens, as a way to find acceptance?
The film doesn’t explore this, instead cherry-picking numbers to serve its story.
Bottom line: I support moderating teens’ use of tech. But such BS claims take our attention off of the REAL problems. It’s more than deceptive. It’s deadly.
Just because that little voice in your head says, “You’re not very good at this,” or “You’re not cut out for this,” or “Maybe you should try something else,” doesn't mean you have to listen to it.
Understanding how we can reimagine the internal trigger—the discomfort that makes us feel that way—can help.
1/ What really prompts you to compulsively look at your phone, or scroll a social media feed?
2/ If you think about it for a second, you’ll realize the trigger isn’t just what’s on your phone but also what’s on your mind.
3/ Our behaviors are not only triggered by external triggers, like pings, dings, and rings, but also by internal triggers like feeling bored, lonely, anxious, or stressed.
1/ Let's talk about what makes for great leadership...
2/ But first, we have to define a term: psychological safety.
Psychological safety is the belief that one will not be punished or humiliated for speaking up with ideas, questions, concerns, or mistakes.
3/ Great leaders understand that fostering psychological safety is imperative to building a culture where employees are motivated to do their best work.
1/ Here’s a quick breakdown of something tech companies can do to help us manage digital distraction without making their products suck!
2/ People often talk about having companies ban certain features that keep us engaged, like infinite scroll or “streaks."
3/ But instead of losing the features that make platforms fun, we should require social networks to implement Use and Abuse policies — systems designed to protect people who are vulnerable.
Tech companies should identify users who want to stop using their products, then help!
And to tell you the honest truth...it isn't a fun job 😅
It's stressful, draining, and when it's unclear whose responsibility something is, it's yours.
2/ Now that I've moved into a role as an investor, one thing I tell startup founders is this: CEOs only have one job -- prioritize.
CEOs are professional prioritizers.
Everything else is detail.
Which brings me to the main issue I find with startup founders.
3/ It's not that they aren't smart or dedicated or capable of performing at a high level, it's that they make no time in their day for their key responsibility of prioritizing.