#tin
Tin is the 49th most abundant element within the Earth and has the chemical symbol Sn, which is derived from the Latin word “Stannum”. Crustal abundance is only 2 parts per million (“ppm”) compared with 75 ppm for zinc, 50 ppm for copper, and 14 ppm for lead.
#tin Tin mining dates back at least 4000 years to the Bronze Age, when tin was alloyed with copper to make bronze. Tin does not occur as the native element but must be extracted from oxide ores. Cassiterite (SnO2) is the only commercially important source of tin.
#tin Cassiterite is insoluble in water and erosional processes of deposits often results in placer deposits. Maybe 70% of all historic tin production has come from hydraulic mining or dredging of these alluvial type deposits, where grades as low as 0.015% tin can be economic.
#tin Due to the depletion of the best alluvial tin deposits a transition from alluvial into hard rock tin mining is on-going.
Refined Tin is traded on the London Metal Exchange that provides a daily price setting mechanism and a warehousing structure to underpin the price.
#tin History of Tin Market (or the roots of the great bull market).
After World War 2 and the start of the Cold War, the CIA identified a vulnerability of the Soviet Union’s economy in that it imported 100% of its tin requirement.
#tin Tin was vital to the Russian military machine to make bronze which was needed to make artillery and naval gun breaches. This was also the start of the electronics age and tin was needed to make electronic solder for circuit boards.
#tin Between 1947 and 1960 the US Defence Logistics Agency (“USDLA”) accumulated a stock pile of 350,000 tons of tin: in a period of only 13 years the USDLA purchased 3 years of total global production!
#tin Tin supplies were squeezed, prices rallied hugely and the Russians embarked on a major exploration programme. Eleven tin deposits were found and Pyrkyky and Pravoursmaskoye in Siberia were put into production. Russia was self-sufficient in tin by 1960.
#tin This new production and the ending of stockpile building caused a major drop in Tin prices and stress for producing countries.
The squeeze was broken and the USDLA embarked on a liquidation programme which would take 45 years.
#tin USDLA stockpile sales averaged 3% of World supply between 1960 and 2005.
#tin In 1956, following on from the work of the International Tin Study Group, which was established in 1947 to survey the world supply and demand of tin, 6 producing countries and 9 consuming countries established of The International Tin Council (“ITC”).
#tin The ITC’s mandate was to keep prices stable and above a floor price by maintaining a buffer stock of 25kt. 6 international agreements were signed by 22 countries but crucially this did not bind either Bolivia or Brazil to production quotas in the sixth and final agreement.
#tin Quota busting by member countries and ever increasing exports from non-member countries occurred simultaneously with a reduction in demand due to the recession of the early the early 1980s.
#tin Unable to maintain the floor price, heavily indebted and leveraged, in October 1985 the ITC collapsed with control of 52,000mt of physical tin, derivatives positions for another 90,000mt and debts of £897m.
#tin 121kt of tin had to be sold as part of the liquidation of the ITC’s assets: 8 months of Global supply! Prices collapsed to circa $5,000 per mt, a level which was continually reverted to until 2005. In real terms the tin price fell 88% between 1980 and 2002.
#tin The tin market was kept amply supplied throughout the 1990’s and early 2000’s due to a massive ramp up in supply from Indonesia, China and Peru, keeping prices depressed and the market in a surplus. This 20 year bear market utterly discouraged tin exploration.
#tin Most mining companies exited tin and as a consequence today there is a severe shortage of projects. Further exacerbating the supply side outlook, there are very few geologists, mining engineers or mineral processing engineers with knowledge or experience of tin.
#tin The ending of the USDLA disposal programme in 2005 marked the end of the decline and prices rallied sharply to +$20k. Massive new discoveries in Myanmar capped the rally in 2015.
#tin Myanmar's best stuff has now been mined and production is decreasing. The depletion of high grade alluvial deposits in Indonesia has raised marginal cost of production and the industry average cash-cost is such that at $20,000 only circa 90% of production is profitable.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#zinc
The global zinc market is, give or take, 13 million tonnes. China is far and away the largest producer with over a third of mine production and smelter capacity. Supply growth in China is static though with new mines barely replacing old mine capacity.
#zinc
Zinc’s main use is as a anti-corrosion coating on steel in the construction and automotive industries. This is called galvanization. Other uses include alloy (brass mainly) die-casting precision components and as a fertiliser additive.
#zinc
Consumption growth is highly correlated to Global economic growth - 2.5x geared to growth above/below 2.5%. (i.e. zero consumption growth at 2.5%, but 5% consumption GDP growth of 4.5%.)
#Tin
The secret to tin investment is easy if you focus on 3 things: mineralogy, mineralogy and mineralogy.
#tin Cassiterite is THE ONLY commercially valuable tin mineral. Most hard rock tin deposits contain some stannite (tin sulphide) and tin silicates. Look at the cassiterite grade, NOT tin grade.
#tin Alluvial deposits are more attractive generally than hard rock as they are 100% cassiterite. Cassiterite is dense with a specific gravity of 7 so water action concentrates it in placer type deposits.
#GOLD
Why you should only ever buy gold mining stocks and not gold.
#gold
This is going to make me unpopular with some of you, but I am going to explain why you should never buy gold. Do not confuse this with owning gold mining stocks though.
#gold
Gold is a store of value. This is true. In Roman times one ounce of gold would clothe a men nicely and the same is true today.
#copper
A smelter buys a 30% copper concentrate at a TC of $40 + 40c / lb RC. This basis the LME copper price of $9,000 per tonne. The copper content of one tonne of concentrate is 300kg. (30% of 1t). It is worth $2,700 (0.3t x 9,000 per t)
#copper
So if a smelter buys at a TC of $10, they are buying copper at a discount of $55 only. Their costs are still $200. So if they hedge forward sell when they buy the concentrate they are locking in a loss of $145.
#copper
So bringing this thread all together and explaining what it means. 1. TC's are trading at a level where smelters cannot make money. 2. This can only happen when smelters have consumed all available profitable stocks
#copper
I keep seeing this Wood-Mackenzie chart in every copper presentation. I started my career in 1994 when the market was about 10Mt and Sumitomo embarked on a massive attempted copper market squeeze.
#copper
There are copper projects out there, of course, and they are all raising capital and advancing feasibility studies. But I strongly contend that there are not enough and they cannot be built in time to meet expected demand.
#copper
10 years of below trend copper exploration has consequences.
My very strong view is the only way out of this situation is for the copper price to go to a level where demand is substituted or destroyed.
Investing in #Tungsten
I start off each series on investing in a different metal talking about mineralogy – this will be no different! There are 2 commercially valuable mineral types in tungsten – scheelite (calcium tungstate) and the wolframite series (iron-manganese tungstate.)
Scheelite is generally speaking easier and cheaper to recover than wolframite, mainly because it is recoverable via gravity and flotation means whereas wolframite only by gravity. Scheelite fluoresces which can make a trip to an underground #tungsten mine very interesting!
Both scheelite and wolframite are brittle meaning that they are liable to produce unrecoverable slimes during processing. These #tungsten minerals have a very high specific gravity though, of 6 g/cm3 and 7 g/cm3 respectively, making gravity separation relatively simple.