Ralamast Profile picture
2 May, 26 tweets, 15 min read
What is the @Greenpeace position on #fossil gas ? We know that they are against #nuclear power, but if that had to choose, will they first prefer to phase out of #fossil fuels or #nuclear power ?
Let's find out!
[Thread]
Have a look to this report titled « Silent Killers – Why Europe must replace coal power with green energy » and published in 400 ppm (2013)

greenpeace.org/static/planet4… Image
The document aims at explaining that 300 plants in EU burn #coal to produce #electricity, killing prematurely 22000 people every year while being the largest source of the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions Image
Now go on P40 and see by yourself how fast they plan to phase out of #coal.
#Coal maybe the silent killer, but phasing out as fast as possible of #nuclear-low-carbon-production is @Greenpeace priority in 400 ppm (2013)

That's a fact. Image
The graph is extracted from a report called « Energy [r]evolution », published by @Greenpeace. I found a version of 2015 👇
greenpeace.org/static/planet4…
The report aims at providing 3 scenarios for the world energy transition (P59)

1⃣ A Reference scenario
2⃣ An Energy [R]evolution scenario
3⃣ An Advanced Energy [R]evolution scenario Image
I only focus on this thread with the results for electricity production in EU. Those are given from P328 to P330. ImageImageImage
In order to compare all three scenarios,  I gathered the data for electricity generation (TWh/a) and installed capacity in one single table (I did not include renewables).
Let's see the Energy [R]evolution scenario … evolution until 2050 Image
In 2012, installed capacity for hard-coal, nuclear and gas fired power plants is as follows :

Hard Coal : 117 GW
Nuclear : 127 GW
Gas : 240 GW
In 2030 and compared to 2012

Hard Coal : 50GW [-67 GW↔-57%]
Nuclear : 11GW [-116 GW↔-91%]
Gas : 309GW [+69 GW ↔+29%]

FACT: for @Greenpeace, it's fine to shut down 91% of EU nuclear-low-carbon fleet while increasing by 29 % gas fired power plants fleet
In 2040 and compared to 2012

Hard Coal : 9 GW [-108 GW↔-92%]
Nuclear : 0 GW [-127 GW↔-100%]
Gas : 281 GW [+41 GW↔+17%]

FACT: in 2040 for @Greenpeace,the EU had phased out of nuclear, not of coal and the installed capacity of gas fired power plant is still +17 %
And by 2050, 162 GW of gas fired power plant will still be available for burning fossil gas.

But be reassured, the EU had phased out of #nuclear power as fast as we could a long time ago, because it's actually @Greenpeace priority.

Before phasing out of #fossils.
@Greenpeace [R]evolution scenario pretty much spares #gas fired power plants. But why ?
Let's have a look at who wrote the report aside with @Greenpeace  : @GWECGlobalWind and @SolarPowerEU Image
@gwec : Global Wind Energy Council is a Wind Power Energy lobby. And in 2021, who can we find as partners along with the Wind Power Energy lobby  ? Fossil fuels industry ! Non-exhaustive list :
gwec.net/about/our-memb… Image
DNV GL : Oil and Gas interests !
dnv.com
SHELL : Oil and Gas interests !
offshorewind.biz/tag/shell/
GULF : Oil and Gas interests !
gulf.co.th/en/
Equinor : Oil and Gas interests !
equinor.com/en.html
@SolarPowerEU is a Solar Power Energy lobby. And in 2021, who can we find as partners along with the Solar Power Energy lobby  ? Fossil fuels industry ! Non-exhaustive list :
solarpowereurope.org/membership/ ImageImage
ENI: Oil and Gas interests !
eni.com/en-IT/home.html
ENGIE: Oil and Gas interests (including @NordStream2)
engie.com
TOTAL: Oil and Gas interests !
total.com/fr
DNV GL (again) : Oil and Gas interests !
dnv.com

I'm not saying that's part of a plan.

Just pointing out that @Greenpeace wrote in 2015 a report about the energy transition with @GWECGlobalWind and @SolarPowerEU

@GWECGlobalWind and @SolarPowerEU have nowadays partners with the fossil fuel industry.
The report concludes that it is mandatory to shut down as fast as possible all nuclear power plants in EU, while opening gas fired power plants.

In 2050, still 162 GW of gas fired power plant will be available according to the 2015 Energy [R]evolution scenario.
Can @Greenpeace and #fossil fuels industry have common interests ? Of course not, that's impossible.

Greenpeace is the good guy. That's what I was told.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ralamast

Ralamast Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Ralamast

8 Dec
Le problème avec les prophètes c'est qu'on ne sait pas vraiment si ce qu'ils racontent est le fruit d'une hallucination ou d'une véritable réflexion.
Mais bon, puisqu'on est dans la guerre de religion sur ce topic, on va pas cracher sur ce commandement.
Une pensée pour les militants anti-nucléaires quand même.
Bon courage aussi à la nouvelle coalition Allemande
Read 4 tweets
2 Jul
Ce soir, j'avais envie de raconter n'importe quoi (plus que d'habitude)
C'est fait
👇
15 Juillet 2021
Face au revirement de l'opinion publique Suédoise sur le ☢️, une jeune habitante du pays est interrogée par un journaliste sur sa position.
Elle répond qu'elle n'est pas opposée au ☢️ puisque c'est une source d'énergie qui permet d'éviter le recours au fossile.
16 Juillet
Réunion de crise chez EELV. La décision est prise de ne pas communiquer pour l'instant.

La droite compare la jeune fille à Jeanne d'Arc. X.Bertand propose de renommer le site de DAMPIERRE du nom de la jeune fille.

Au PS, on explique qu'il faut rassembler la gauche.
Read 30 tweets
24 Jun
La semaine dernière, l'EPR de Taishan a eu droit à la une des médias suite à un article de CNN.
Et si on regardait le côté politique de l'affaire ?

Tout d'abord, un peu de contexte. En Chine il existe 2 principaux exploitants (CGN et CNNC) et 2 petits (SNPTC et CPIC). CGN est l'exploitant de 2 EPR (Taishan 1&2), CNNC l'exploitant de 2 AP1000 (SANMEN 1&2) et CPIC de 2 autres AP1000 (HAIYANG 1&2)
L'AP1000 est une technologie de REP GEN3 développée par Westinghouse (USA) et un concurrent direct de l'EPR.
fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C3%A9ac…
Read 31 tweets
22 Jun
Greenpeace et l'industrie fossile ont pour intérêt commun d'effacer le nucléaire du paysage énergétique.
Y a-t-il eu pour autant une alliance de circonstance ? Je vous laisse juger par vous-même
🔽
En 2015, GP produit un rapport appelé « Energy [R]evolution ». Sans surprises, pour l'Europe, ce scénario implique de ↘️ de 91 % du nucléaire dès 2030.
greenpeace.org/static/planet4…
MAIS il implique par contre une ↗️ de 29 % du parc au gaz, toujours dès 2030.
Chacun ses priorités
Là où je veux vous emmener, c'est d'aller voir QUI a co-écrit ce scénario « Energy [R]evolution » avec GP : GWEC et SolarPowerEurope. Respectivement lobby Eolien et Solaire

Qui trouve-t-on en sponsor de ces lobbys ? L'industrie EnR évidemment, mais aussi fossile Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(