Lineages with #N440K are NOT the dominant ones in the second wave of #Covid19inIndia. While N440K was a indeed mutation of concern in South India during and after the first wave, current data shows that it is essentially replaced by new VoCs such as #B1617 and #B117
When comparing the data from MH, in MH we can see that the increase in B.1.617 is seen in Feb rather than Mar 2021, and again we observe a reduction in proportion of lineages with N440K.
This coincides well with the second waves seen in the respective states. In MH, the second wave started almost a month and half earlier compared to the 4 southern states, along with the explosion of B.1.617 at the expense of lineages with the mutation N440K.
In KL, though not much data is available on GISAID, we can see from genescov2.genomes.in that B.1.1.7 is increasing at present, whereas N440K is present in <20% of the genomes

Pics courtesy: @vinodscaria
Also, it is important to remember that just because a variant behaves a certain way in cell cultures (with no competition, and in controlled settings), it does not mean it will behave the same way in humans, or in a complicated pandemic scenario.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Divya Tej Sowpati

Divya Tej Sowpati Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TejSowpati

22 Apr
So much misinformation and confusion about the circulating #SARSCoV2 variants in India. Leaving aside that the names are scientifically inaccurate, #B1618 ("Bengal variant") is NOT the #tripleMutant. I will try to summarize the basics in this thread.

(1/n)
B.1.617: characterized by more than 15 mutations, it got dubbed the "double mutant" because of two spike mutations, L452R and E484Q, which were mutations of concern because of their immune escape properties, and possible high infectivity.


(2/n)
What's more, there are several sequences of B.1.617 which don't have the E484Q mutation, now sampled in India and elsewhere, which means it's not even the OG "double mutant" anymore.

(3/n)
Read 10 tweets
19 Sep 20
Our updated analysis on #SARSCoV2 clades in India, now peer-reviewed and published in OFID by @OxUniPress. In collaboration with @vinodscaria @IGIBSocial. Congratulations to the entire team.
doi.org/10.1093/ofid/o…
#Genomics #IndiaFightsCOVID19
I’ve never done one of these before, but I’m gonna make a thread of tweets explaining the key findings, and more importantly what our paper doesn’t show. 1/n
First and foremost, there is no conclusive evidence at present that any clade of SARS-CoV-2 is associated with increased mortality or severity of the disease. 2/n
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!