Okay - one more time. That little purple line at the bottom? That's Ontario #Covid cases from travellers (most of whom are returning Canadians). The other lines are sources the province has chosen to not control. #ONpoli #cdnpoli
If only the Province of Ontario published this kind of data themselves. Oh, wait. They do. #ONpoli
covid-19.ontario.ca/data/likely-so…
And the inevitable push back is "The first cases came from abroad! We have to keep the variants out!" That horse has long since left the barn. The original virus arrived before we identified it. Same with variants. Unless you're a hermit kingdom, viruses will get in...
Borders cannot be hermetically sealed. What we can do (and are doing) is slow the arrival of by limiting cross-border travel. Canada has had restrictions on non-essential travel and quarantine since March 2020.
Finally, with enough infected or just bad luck, variants - even the same genetic variant - can appear in closed systems. That is the nature of mutation and successful natural selection, so an "iron ring" can help slow, but will not always prevent.
And for the Albertans out there, where Kenney is beating the same foreigner/traveller drum, here is a Govt of Alberta chart on source of recent Covid infection. See a pattern? #ableg #ONpoli
Found a historic chart of source of Covid infection in Alberta. Look familiar? alberta.ca/stats/covid-19…
So, border and other mobility restrictions (like stay at home orders) are important to slow the spread of disease, but travel is a minor source of new infection. Much bigger sources are schools and workplaces which the provinces kept open.
Borders are a red herring to deflect from failures in these other areas of provincial control and refusal to act, and play on the "dirty foreigner" trope that has sadly been so effective with right-wing populist governments since the early 20th century.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen Lautens

Stephen Lautens Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @stephenlautens

3 Aug 19
One more obvious thing about the Fraser Institute tax "study": What is a "profit tax"? Except for this chart, it is never defined or mentioned again in the report itself, so we don't know what it is. It isn't in the Income Tax Act. More fakery. #cndpoli

Is it a capital gains tax (gain on certain types of investments)? You'd think they'd use that term if it was. Even so, a family would have to have a capital gain of about $15-20,000 a year to have a capital gain tax liability of $4,726 a year. #cdnpoli
Or is it the tax on corporate "profits", which is exactly what the Fraser Institute deceptively rolls into their calculation of Canadians' "tax burden", even though their chart and headlines say clearly (and dishonestly) that this is "Tax bill of the average Canadian family"...
Read 8 tweets
4 Jul 19
The Hon. George Strathy, now Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Appeal who denied Del Mastro's final appeal, was a Harper appointee, as were most of the SCC Justices who denied his leave to appeal to them. #cdnpoli
The thing about Canadian judges - in stark contrast to the USA - is that they drop all politics and keep their own personal politics under close wraps the moment they are appointed to the bench. The ideology of Judges is almost impossible to see in decisions /...3
While some judges may be known for a slight bias on certain issues, it is usually only a matter of minor degree. It never comes out as support for partisan politics or policies. This was something even Harper learned, much to his chagrin. /...4
Read 12 tweets
31 Mar 19
Exactly. That is what Wernick said in his JUSCOM testimony. That the "national" part of the "national economic interest" prohibition in DPA laws was about international competitiveness, not domestic jobs. I think he is right.
That's why this bit of his testimony at JUSCOM makes sense. It may also explain why PMO/PCO were at loggerheads with JWR who interpreted it to simply mean any "economic interests" (ie: jobs) ignoring what "national" is there for. #cdnpoli
Frankly, I think that is what this whole #SNCLavalin fight has been about - differing opinion about what "national economic interests" in the DPA law means, and the PCO being frustrated by JWR insisting it means "any" economic interest...
Read 5 tweets
30 Mar 19
I've been a private lawyer and corporate counsel literally for decades. Clients come to you and say: "I want to do this." My job is to say, "Okay", or, "You can't because of X or Y". Some clients take advice. Some insist on the wrong route. My duty is then to quit. #cdnpoli
It is not my duty to stop them from getting other advice (which may or may not agree with me), or stop them from proceeding in what in my legal judgment is the wrong path. My duty is to quit.
I can argue with them, but it is not my job to stop them from proceeding in what I judge to be an ill-advised way. They take my advice or (again), I quit. I have a duty to not participate in criminality (if there is any - and JWR said there wasn't), but not to to be a barrier.
Read 48 tweets
10 Feb 19
I know I'll regret it, but the SNC-Lavalin / AG "scandal" is an interesting issue. There are people better versed in this than I, but I keep coming up with "what if" scenarios. Here's one that just occurred to me... 2/...
The AG can legally take charge and change direction of a prosecution (like SNC-Lavalin) being run by the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) under Section 15 of the DPP Act. /3...
This is not an "abuse of power" or "obstruction of justice", unless of course it is done for some improper purpose. Decisions to take charge have to be "used sparingly" and "ensure that decisions are taken in the public interest." /4...
Read 21 tweets
9 Feb 19
I'll point out one more stumbling block regarding pressure on the AG to cut SNC-Lavalin a deal. The prosecution is carried out by the Director of Public Prosecutions, who is largely independent of the AG & appointed for a non-renewable 7-year term .../2 ppsc-sppc.gc.ca/eng/bas/index.…
The DPP has a staff of about 1000, and is independent of (but subject to the supervision of) the AG... /3 ppsc-sppc.gc.ca/eng/pub/fpsd-s…
The AG can issue a directive to the DPP about a prosecution or even assume conduct of a prosecution, but must do so in writing and a notice must be published in the Canada Gazette. .../4
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!