π¨ Compelling travellers is undergo invasive medical procedure as a pre-requisite to departure, arrival, & re-entry to their country of origin is *illegal* @travelweekly
π Chapter 3, Article 31, para.1 of the International Health Regulations (2005)
telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/05/1β¦
π Chapter 3, Article 31, para.1 of the International Health Regulations (2005)
telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/05/1β¦
β "Invasive medical examination, vaccination, or other prophylaxis, shall not be required as a condition of entry of any traveller to the territory of a State Party" 
β
Article 32: Treatment of Travellers:
"State Parties shall treat travellers with respect for their dignity, human rights, and fundamental freedoms, and minimize any discomfort or distress associated with such measures"
"State Parties shall treat travellers with respect for their dignity, human rights, and fundamental freedoms, and minimize any discomfort or distress associated with such measures"
β Part 6: Health Documents, Article 35 - General Rule:
"No health documents other than those provided for under these Regulations or in recommendation issued by the WHO, shall be required in International traffic."
"No health documents other than those provided for under these Regulations or in recommendation issued by the WHO, shall be required in International traffic."
Annex 6.
Even though some #COVID19 jabs have been accepted by @WHO - these EUA only, unlicensed & not fully tested #mRNA jabs are *not* 'vaccines', legally & technically speaking.
Unless this agreement is updated, majority nations are violating international law.
Even though some #COVID19 jabs have been accepted by @WHO - these EUA only, unlicensed & not fully tested #mRNA jabs are *not* 'vaccines', legally & technically speaking.
Unless this agreement is updated, majority nations are violating international law.
'to undergo', typo. Apologies.
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
γ
