The weirdest part about amateur #running is all the metaphysics running websites try to instill in an otherwise monotonous sport.

I run for things like weight control, cardio-pulmonary depth (VO2 max), & better health for my family, but according to the internet, I am a hero,

1
finding my true self, forging new paths, finding my fast, breaking barriers, and most recently, advancing progressive social causes like equity. Wow. I am doing all that just putting one foot in front of the other at speed?

I am not. Only ultrarunners with careers in the

2
talk like this; no one in my running club ever did. The rest of us are schlepping along.

In fact, these sites should be honest about the biggest problem with #running for amateurs - it's dull. Once you get to serious distances - 50+ miles a week - you need to learn how to

3
dial down your active mind while you pound out the long miles. Clubs can help, but corona has wrecked all that.

You'll learn more about distance running from Iron Maiden - yes, 80s hair bands are a font of unacknowledged wisdom - than Runners World:

4

And here is my Strava page if you are interested:

strava.com/athletes/47981…

5
And then there’s this, on the subway no less. Good grief: instagram.com/p/CO2YglFhUFl/…

6
Here’s today’s night hills

7

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Robert E Kelly

Robert E Kelly Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Robert_E_Kelly

6 May
Everyone is complaining about what a dud the new Biden N Korea policy review was. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…

It basically recommends deterrence/containment/sanction/isolation, which is what we've done for decades.

There is a reason we keep coming back to this posture - bc all

1
the other alternatives have clear downsides:

A. The hawkish/conservative alternative - to use force or drones as we do so often in the greater Middle East - is hugely risky. NK has lots of capabilities to hit back, and SK is very vulnerable, especially with its capital right

2
on the border (a terrible strategic problem which really ties US-ROK military hands)

B. The dovish/liberal alternative - engagement and concessions - has a poor record of success. NK loves stringing out talks forever as a way of muddying the waters and creating the perception

3
Read 6 tweets
24 Apr
THREAD on Trump’s Rant about the S Korean President calling Him, Correctly, a 'Failure' in the NYT

1. Moon Jae-In indeed throws T under the bus in the Times

Moon & his advisors quickly realized that T, like Fredo, was weak & stupid & wanted respect. M deluded T with visions

1
of a Nobel Prize if he met the NK leader Kim Jong Un. M wanted that meeting, bc the SK left has long thought an apex summit was the best way to side-step the hawkish-on-NK US foreign policy community. All spring 2018, that hawkish FPC community indeed told T not meet KJU; T

2
didn’t listen to us of course; and then made a colossal hash out of negotiations, bc he is an idiot: . M then called T a failure last week. Harsh

2. T’s response illustrates yet again that he is totally unfit for public office

It’s petty, mean-spirited

3
Read 8 tweets
21 Apr
Exactly. This is a language game. To my mind, it’s pretty simple:

We should do the best we can to avoid a cold war with China. But we’re not, and neither is the Xi government. So we’re all sliding into one anyway. Bad.

And far too many Beltway types are fine with that bc:

1
a) The natsec community draws influence and a salary in an environment of strategic competition; China hawkishness will pay.

b) 30 years of unipolarity has impoverished American thinking about diplomacy. We’re too used to knee-jerk belligerence.

Consider, eg, that much GOP

2
hawkishness on China is simply to cover-up for Trump’s massive incompetence on corona. Trump and MAGA would happily risk dangerous cold war competition rather than admit that Trump is a colossal idiot who didn’t care if Americans died.

So yeah, stumbling into a cold war with

3
Read 7 tweets
29 Mar
I’m not saying it’s impossible. But it’s fairly outlandish: Would not a disaster so massive that it wiped out the cops, Guard, and military also send gangsters fleeing? When Katrina hit and the police disintegrated, didn’t the bad guys run also?

The American state is far

2
more capable than these apocalypse scenarios - to justify long gun ownership - admit. The US is NOT on the brink of anarchy, about to be invaded, about to collapse under the national debt, and so on. The American state has multiple levels and multiple agencies which use force.

3
For them ALL to collapse so badly that you’re on your doorstep fighting off Mad Max with your AR-15 would require something like a nuclear strike to bring about. This is the scenario of the movie ‘Amerigeddon,’ not, um, anything remote plausible.

The smart play for personal

4
Read 5 tweets
29 Mar
Consider the extremely low probability of Graham’s scenario:

- a natural disaster so massive that

- the police/National Guard/military are so overwhelmed that

- gangs have take over the streets like Death Wish 3

Versus the far greater likelihood of an armed lunatic in a store
I’m not saying it’s impossible. But it’s fairly outlandish: Would not a disaster so massive that it wiped out the cops, Guard, and military also send gangsters fleeing? When Katrina hit and the police disintegrated, didn’t the bad guys run also?

The American state is far

2
more capable than these apocalypse scenarios - to justify long gun ownership - admit. The US is NOT on the brink of anarchy, about to be invaded, about to collapse under the national debt, and so on. The American state has multiple levels and multiple agencies which use force.

3
Read 6 tweets
27 Mar
THREAD

3 Issues/Problems in S Korean Foreign Policy unrelated to the usual ‘shrimp among whales’ narrative

1. Sharp Partisan Polarization, particularly regarding NK

The result is abrupt right/left swings in foreign policy across partisan changes in the presidency, plus NK

1
fantasies on both sides: the right’s strangelovian paranoia about NK infiltration and NK manipulation of the SK left; the left’s adamant refusal to admit that NK is '1984' and similarly adamant insistence that NK is a normal country & brother Korean state whose inherent

2
cooperativeness is undercut by the Americans and sanctions.

2. Not Enough Grand Strategy

The Lee and Park governments produced rudimentary national security strategies; the Moon gov’t hasn’t even bothered. And MOFA white papers are more boosterish about Korean pop culture

3
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(