1/ When I tweeted out the article by @MicahHanks yesterday (again, kudos to my friend Micah for it!) I made a comment about the downright swiftness of the confirmation he wrote about on the side of the Pentagon. Others have wondered the same, and have asked about my experience...
https://twitter.com/kentbye/status/1393452920129998855
2/
with the first confirmation I got when @g_knapp and @JeremyCorbell published the first round of imagery. So, I figured I would do this timeline:
4/6 PM Acorn, Metallic Blimp & Sphere photos are published by @MysteryWire.
4/7 AM: I wrote the Pentagon & US Navy for comment
with the first confirmation I got when @g_knapp and @JeremyCorbell published the first round of imagery. So, I figured I would do this timeline:
4/6 PM Acorn, Metallic Blimp & Sphere photos are published by @MysteryWire.
4/7 AM: I wrote the Pentagon & US Navy for comment
3/
4/8 @JeremyCorbell publishes the "flying pyramid" video. The Black Vault had received no responses from the Pentagon or Navy on the first email.
4/9 I wrote the Pentagon and Navy AGAIN asking about the new material, including *again* the briefing slides, photos and video.
4/8 @JeremyCorbell publishes the "flying pyramid" video. The Black Vault had received no responses from the Pentagon or Navy on the first email.
4/9 I wrote the Pentagon and Navy AGAIN asking about the new material, including *again* the briefing slides, photos and video.
4/
4/9 Early Evening: I received the Pentagon's confirmation, replying to my email about the *briefing slides, photos and video.* After follow ups, she declined to comment on designation, so I published that night.
So, overall, a couple days from first ask to answer.
4/9 Early Evening: I received the Pentagon's confirmation, replying to my email about the *briefing slides, photos and video.* After follow ups, she declined to comment on designation, so I published that night.
So, overall, a couple days from first ask to answer.
5/
It appears THIS go around, the Pentagon was MUCH quicker, which is intriguing to me. I have now long felt since the "Batman Balloon" story, there was something to these leaks just being allowed to happen, and the Pentagon now getting QUICKER in "authenticating" them.
It appears THIS go around, the Pentagon was MUCH quicker, which is intriguing to me. I have now long felt since the "Batman Balloon" story, there was something to these leaks just being allowed to happen, and the Pentagon now getting QUICKER in "authenticating" them.
6/
My compliments to @JeremyCorbell for bringing this out. I mean that. I harp on the use of anonymous sources, but as we can see in the last couple cases, his leads and evidence begins to check out on some level. I respect that.
But what else may be going on here?
My compliments to @JeremyCorbell for bringing this out. I mean that. I harp on the use of anonymous sources, but as we can see in the last couple cases, his leads and evidence begins to check out on some level. I respect that.
But what else may be going on here?
7/
Why is it the Pentagon seemingly doesn't care about the leaks; will confirm the authenticity of the material; will confirm it's taken by Navy personnel; will confirm it's used by the UAPTF; but WON'T comment on their designation?
IMHO? Shenanigans are afoot.
Stay tuned...
Why is it the Pentagon seemingly doesn't care about the leaks; will confirm the authenticity of the material; will confirm it's taken by Navy personnel; will confirm it's used by the UAPTF; but WON'T comment on their designation?
IMHO? Shenanigans are afoot.
Stay tuned...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
