"Proof of Stake = rich get richer" is an example of a half-truth
It paints a human societal problem as something that's unique to Proof of Stake (it's not)
Proof of Work has the same exact problem with ASICs, but arguably worse because of economies of scale for energy usage
Yes it's true that PoW miners need to sell a *portion* of their mined coins to stay profitable, but ultimately the profit margins between PoW and PoS will be extremely similar
PoW's higher selling pressure simply means more buyers are needed in order to just keep the price flat
With EIP-1559 burning the base fees of transactions, PoS systems can be deflationary, off-setting this problem by granting *everyone* a higher percentage of the supply over time
Having captial always means you can generate more capital, this is not at all unique to PoS *or* PoW
Not to mention, PoW miners don't even need to sell their coins, they can borrow against it using CeFi or DeFi to pay for energy expenses and to fund their expansion, meaning when price goes up, they don't need to sell as much coins
PoW is not inherently more "fair" than PoS
With PoW's economies of scale, the rich actually get richer in the sense the per dollar cost for yield lowers as they scale up
With PoS, regardless of how much capital you have, everybody is earning the same yield
So really it's the opposite as what maxis try to paint it as
Maybe this is too nuanced of a discussion for twitter, but it's the number one narrative I see as an argument against PoS
Half truths are the hardest to dispute, because there is an element of truth to it, but the framing leads to false conclusions
You can see the same thing with communism, it's assumed that hierarchies and inequality are inherently a result of capitalism, but it's deeper than that
Look at how ants specialize, the concentration of capital to a select few is an issue, but not unique to one system or another
PoS actually vresults in a *more equitable outcome* because it doesn't matter how much capital you have or where your geographically located, everybody has access to the same exact yield
A PoS system will become the dominant settlement layer, and I believe that to be $ETH
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Interesting discussion today with @elonmusk about the differences between #Bitcoin and #Dogecoin in regards to decentralization and the ability to serve as a new digitally-native money for the people
Here are some additional nuances on the subject
2/ As one of the people who helped bootstrap @PayPal to where it is today, I understand Elon's perspective regarding the traditional centralized currencies like $USD in the context of payments
But blockchains are entirely different technology with very different considerations
3/ Blockchains are designed to be inherently decentralized, censorship resistant, and permissionless in order to lower the barrier of entry for financial activity
Centralized finance does not reflect these values due to its centralized, censorable, and permissioned nature
"The initial integration involves @FloatProtocol leveraging the widely-used $ETH/USD @Chainlink Price Feed to power our monetary policy and price stabilisation mechanisms"
"@DafiProtocol's algorithmic distribution model secured by #Chainlink’s decentralized data feeds opens up a new type of token distribution mechanism that creates much needed long-term incentives for supporting decentralized networks"
"By integrating #Chainlink VRF, we (@OfficialZeroDEX) ensure that ALL Launchpad participants have a provably fair and unbiased chance at being selected as a winner of various IDO allocations"
1/ Vitalik recently created a proposal on the Uniswap governance forum that they should shift focus and create a human-based token-weighted voting oracle mechanism to provide algorithmic stablecoins with USD-paired price data
Here's why I think this is not a practical proposal
2/ What is suggested is that Uniswap copy the Augur/UMA model where $UNI token holders are asked what the price of an asset is against USD, it is voted upon, and then multi-day/week dispute rounds are initiated as needed that can ultimately result in a token fork
3/ To note, this proposed oracle mechanism has nothing to do with Uniswap's existing on-chain TWAP oracle that I explored in this blog post below
"Because market data is fetched from off-chain, on-chain flash loans have zero effect on the data provided by the ETH/USD @Chainlink Price Feed, entirely solving the issues presented in the theoretical examples above" -@orbs_network orbs.com/orbs-integrate…
"@SataToken is building risk analysis systems off-chain for service providers, who will then in turn report dynamic risk levels of identities on-chain using #Chainlink-powered decentralized oracle networks"
"We are excited to announce that @RulerProtocol is now using #Chainlink Price Feeds live on mainnet to secure user funds within our no-liquidation lending platform"
“Not only are we able to leverage #Chainlink’s time-tested security, but its native operation on #BSC allows us to get consistently fresh data for a much lower price.” — Joelito Lizarondo @JLSwipe, Founder Venus Protocol and CEO of Swipe Wallet.
This kills the BAND narrative
"We are pleased to announce that @polywhalefi, the first yield farming platform on the @0xPolygon network, has integrated #Chainlink's Verifiable Random Function (VRF) on mainnet to secure the Polywhale Lottery system"