Making matters worse, social media companies — like FB, Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok — are censoring Palestinians as they face military violence and evictions from their homes.
Since 1967 the state of Israel has occupied East Jerusalem, where Sheikh Jarrah residents have been peacefully protesting against forced evictions.
In the past 2 weeks, Israeli police violence/crackdowns have escalated. Nearly 200 Palestinians have died. aljazeera.com/news/2021/5/17…
Palestinian activists and citizens are primarily using social media to draw global attention.
People have taken to social media to document and denounce Israel police brutality, violent attacks, occupation and apartheid, and forced dispossession from their homes.
But Access Now has received hundreds of reports that social platforms are suppressing Palestinian protest hashtags, blocking livestreams, and removing posts and accounts. It appears systematic: accessnow.org/sheikh-jarrah-…
We’re not only seeing the censorship of civilians — but of journalists, too. On May 11, Twitter "accidentally" suspended @MariamBarghouti, who was on the ground reporting on protests in the West Bank: vice.com/en/article/qj8…
Facebook (which owns Instagram) and Twitter have apologized, but haven't provided any real explanations.
They attribute the censorship to “technical errors.” Activists say it’s deliberate.
Beyond content and account takedowns, many social media companies are — intentionally or not — making decisions that are harming Palestinian lives.
For example, @samfbiddle recently obtained Facebook's (very vague) internal policy on when to delete FB/Instagram posts containing the word "Zionist." The company previously told Access Now’s @marwasf that this policy didn’t exist. theintercept.com/2021/05/14/fac…
As @josephcox reports, Google refuses to say if it will update its blurry maps of Gaza. Without high-res imagery, it’s harder to verify what is happening on the ground: vice.com/en/article/m7e…
It doesn’t matter if these actions are unintentional or technical glitches. Tech companies have had more than enough time to restore accounts/posts, address these issues, or, at the very least, provide concrete explanations. change.org/p/facebook-sav…@SMEX
These content/account takedowns are part of a wider pattern of censorship of Palestinian and allied voices and systematic efforts to silence them.
We demand that social media companies immediately stop censoring and reinstate the accounts and content of Palestinian voices. These companies must open transparent investigations into these takedowns, and publicly share their findings.
Social media companies need to involve civil society, and take their roles seriously. Too much is at stake.
Our concerns include:
📲 Exclusion & discrimination — Not everyone has vaccine access & these “passports” could further divide nations
📲 Privacy & security — Any system would collect personal info, risking privacy & increasing potential for surveillance, profiling & breaches
Our recommendations for decision-makers include:
✅ Do what is effective, not what is trending: Prioritize people and their needs, not a technical tool, and optimize for solutions that are less intrusive and that don’t hinder rollout of COVID-19 vaccines.
Yesterday, the Ugandan Communication Commission ordered ISPs to:
- block social media platforms, including Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp, Instagram, and Playstore Apps
- block over 100 VPNs (circumvention tools), making it impossible to avoid the censorship accessnow.org/uganda-interne…
The government has effectively cut off millions of people off from each other and the world.
Tech companies made the right call to stop hosting Parler after it refused to combat calls to violence. Action was needed, even though it was late and reactionary.
It’s also not that simple. THREAD 🧵
We should take platform shutdowns seriously.
What happened with Parler points to several larger issues that are not completely about Parler. Here are 5 we want to break down 👇
1) It highlights that Big Tech companies like Apple, Google, and Amazon hold too much power over the internet ecosystem.
2) There’s little to no transparency from these companies on how decisions like this are made.
1/ While our communities are focused on staying safe, as of now, @PIRegistry is still holding @ICANN to the March 20 deadline to decide on whether control of .ORG will transition from @internetsociety to private equity firm @ethos_capital.
2/ The #dotorg transition would add risk to crucial channels of trusted information in a precarious time.
3/ Given the current global crisis around #COVID19, and what is at stake for all who depend on .ORG — including civil society and many healthcare providers around the world — to reach people in urgent need of assistance, PIR should immediately extend the deadline.