These new GOP voting laws are designed to make voting so complex, that almost any election can be disputed. The point isn’t so much to make voting harder but rather, more legally contestable. Voters & poll workers won’t learn all these new rules, providing the legal basis for
1
endless lawsuits over whether this or that voter voted legally: should citizen XYZ should have his vote disqualified bc his wife gave him a ham sandwich while he was waiting on line? It will be Florida 2000 again & again in states where the vote is close. If you can’t win at
2
the polls, or won’t accept that the Democrats legitimately win major races, then make voting rules so absurdly murky & results therefore so unknowable, that you can push decisions into the courts or state legislatures. This is basically adding legal grounds of over-complexity
3
to Trump’s blunt effort to bully the courts and state governments last year.
This ‘working the refs’ strategy is the only choice the GOP has to win if it won’t change ideologically. It’s lost 7 of the last 8 popular votes. It represents a national minority coalition of aging
4
voters, and Trump & Fox won’t let the party moderate to attract new voters. This problem will persist bc T won’t go away. So now the focus is to make election winners legally indeterminable, permitting officials to throw up their hands & impose their own preferences. Creepy
5
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The weirdest part about amateur #running is all the metaphysics running websites try to instill in an otherwise monotonous sport.
I run for things like weight control, cardio-pulmonary depth (VO2 max), & better health for my family, but according to the internet, I am a hero,
1
finding my true self, forging new paths, finding my fast, breaking barriers, and most recently, advancing progressive social causes like equity. Wow. I am doing all that just putting one foot in front of the other at speed?
I am not. Only ultrarunners with careers in the
2
talk like this; no one in my running club ever did. The rest of us are schlepping along.
In fact, these sites should be honest about the biggest problem with #running for amateurs - it's dull. Once you get to serious distances - 50+ miles a week - you need to learn how to
It basically recommends deterrence/containment/sanction/isolation, which is what we've done for decades.
There is a reason we keep coming back to this posture - bc all
1
the other alternatives have clear downsides:
A. The hawkish/conservative alternative - to use force or drones as we do so often in the greater Middle East - is hugely risky. NK has lots of capabilities to hit back, and SK is very vulnerable, especially with its capital right
2
on the border (a terrible strategic problem which really ties US-ROK military hands)
B. The dovish/liberal alternative - engagement and concessions - has a poor record of success. NK loves stringing out talks forever as a way of muddying the waters and creating the perception
THREAD on Trump’s Rant about the S Korean President calling Him, Correctly, a 'Failure' in the NYT
1. Moon Jae-In indeed throws T under the bus in the Times
Moon & his advisors quickly realized that T, like Fredo, was weak & stupid & wanted respect. M deluded T with visions
1
of a Nobel Prize if he met the NK leader Kim Jong Un. M wanted that meeting, bc the SK left has long thought an apex summit was the best way to side-step the hawkish-on-NK US foreign policy community. All spring 2018, that hawkish FPC community indeed told T not meet KJU; T
2
didn’t listen to us of course; and then made a colossal hash out of negotiations, bc he is an idiot:
Exactly. This is a language game. To my mind, it’s pretty simple:
We should do the best we can to avoid a cold war with China. But we’re not, and neither is the Xi government. So we’re all sliding into one anyway. Bad.
And far too many Beltway types are fine with that bc:
a) The natsec community draws influence and a salary in an environment of strategic competition; China hawkishness will pay.
b) 30 years of unipolarity has impoverished American thinking about diplomacy. We’re too used to knee-jerk belligerence.
Consider, eg, that much GOP
2
hawkishness on China is simply to cover-up for Trump’s massive incompetence on corona. Trump and MAGA would happily risk dangerous cold war competition rather than admit that Trump is a colossal idiot who didn’t care if Americans died.
I’m not saying it’s impossible. But it’s fairly outlandish: Would not a disaster so massive that it wiped out the cops, Guard, and military also send gangsters fleeing? When Katrina hit and the police disintegrated, didn’t the bad guys run also?
more capable than these apocalypse scenarios - to justify long gun ownership - admit. The US is NOT on the brink of anarchy, about to be invaded, about to collapse under the national debt, and so on. The American state has multiple levels and multiple agencies which use force.
3
For them ALL to collapse so badly that you’re on your doorstep fighting off Mad Max with your AR-15 would require something like a nuclear strike to bring about. This is the scenario of the movie ‘Amerigeddon,’ not, um, anything remote plausible.
I’m not saying it’s impossible. But it’s fairly outlandish: Would not a disaster so massive that it wiped out the cops, Guard, and military also send gangsters fleeing? When Katrina hit and the police disintegrated, didn’t the bad guys run also?
The American state is far
2
more capable than these apocalypse scenarios - to justify long gun ownership - admit. The US is NOT on the brink of anarchy, about to be invaded, about to collapse under the national debt, and so on. The American state has multiple levels and multiple agencies which use force.