Get ready for a thread of questions about the recent ApoB shortens lifespan Mendelian randomization study, posed as my top 8 questions.

Thanks everyone in advance for their thoughts, genuinely. .@DaveKeto .@ethanjweiss .@DrNadolsky

sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
1/ How robust were the instruments? Were derived from linkage disequilibrium clumping w clumping parameters of 1 million nts, including 229 SNPs 4ApoB. Stated that tool would “not be considered weak,” Can someone explain this to the Twitter lay audience please?
2/ Building on that, while they adjusted for genetic parameters, I didn’t see anything about adjusting for medications? If they’re talking biomarker data and not adjusting for meds doesn’t the analysis appear vulnerable to healthy use bias?
3/ Irrespective of 2, we know the analysis couldn’t have been comprehensive and they were based on ‘genetically predicted ApoB.’ Therefore, is it fair to assume that the data would apply to LMHR individuals who might have (at baseline, pre-low carb) very low ApoB?
4/ Building on 2 and 3, the high-risk of CVD associated with higher ApoB is being put through a filter of a standard diet and lifestyle.

I agree that LDL participates in CVD and is necessary in atherogenesis. But necessity doesn’t imply sufficiency.

So...
4/ cont'
if you have that “rare” case in which ApoB is high but a personal exhibits excellent metabolic health and little inflammation (many LMHRs) then might not the anecdote cause more harm than the poison?

Isn’t this at least possible?
5/ Medications that lower ApoB also lower LDL. In the multivariate, latter is associated w longer lifespan and lower diabetes risk (and lower AD risk). In treating ApoB, affecting two variebles that are both important in the outcome of interest in opposite directions. Correct?
6/ Same discrepancy as seen for diabetes seen for Alzheimer’s in Supp 2-3/5. High ApoB increases risk of maternal AD, whereas high LDL appears protective. Would have been nice to see those data discussed given that T2D/AD r on the rise faster than CVD. Not Q, just an observation
7/ Specifically for .@DaveKeto… Supp figure 8… thoughts?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nick Norwitz

Nick Norwitz Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nicknorwitz

27 Apr
Public Apology Thread
1/ A couple days ago I posted a tweet that I intended to be a commentary on the state of diabetes management in the US. What I didn’t realize at the time is that the image had a lot of historical baggage and suggested a patient-blaming perspective...
2/ Maybe I should have been aware of this history or maybe it’s irrelevant. I’m not asking for forgiveness for that ignorance. The point is that it seriously offended some people. In the hours during which the Tweet is up, before I gathered how it was really hurting people...
3/ and took it down, I doubled down on it in responses. The blunt truth was that I was resistant to listening because I got caught in the heat of aggressive comments, including a few violent threats. Excuses aside, I’m sorry to anyone I hurt. The LAST thing...
Read 5 tweets
5 Apr
Prepare for a thread about Well-formulated #Keto Adherence Paper that just came out.

Randomized crossover trial of 2x12-week #keto #LCHF vs. #Mediterranean diet.

Results show equally sustainable given the right conditions, but...
Researchers designed study that during first 4 weeks of each diet, food was provided & during the next 8 they had to buy their own. Baseline&followup adherence scores were also collected. All this allowed researchers to determine how sustainable diets were under diff conditions
baseline #keto adherence score was lower than Medi score. BUT during the time period when food was provided AND when they had to buy their own food, mean keto score was equal to or higher than Medi score. At the follow-up #keto score had dropped again. From this I conclude...
Read 6 tweets
26 Feb
nature.com/articles/s4159…
Some thoughts on why these results don't mean much to me
1/ It was 2 weeks, which is short term and not enough time for adaptation (see point 8 and others on this)

2/ "Both diets were low in ultra-processed food" is a misrepresentation....
...the low-carb diet was, IMO, unfairly weighted by processed foods and oils including mayo that I assume was made with soybean oil (correct me if I'm wrong), processed cheeses like "American cheese", and so on. It was also weighted towards meats and A1 dairy
3/LC diet appears far more palatable, and both diets were designed by the investigators, not freely chosen by the participants. If my snack options were unlimited roasted salted nuts sitting in front of me or dry edamame, apricots, and raisins, I'd eat more kCal of nuts too.
Read 8 tweets
23 Feb
Colleague and I had this RCT thrown in our face bc suggested a #ketogenicdiet option. Arguement was this RCT shows LCHF ⬆️LDL, therefore bad. Here's a thread about what I think...
(Spoiler, LCHF = good)...
1/ The LDL increase in the LCHF group may not itself be an adverse outcome. There was no subfractionation and it’s likely the increase in LDL and ApoB was driven by large fluffy healthy LDL particles. This assumption is supported an improvement in HDL levels in the LCHF group.
2/ HDL increased on the LCHF group, not the control group. When HDL is high and triglycerides are low, CVD risk is not meaningfully increased. See figure attached from Framingham. Furthermore, HDL (and waist circumference, below) are markers of metabolic syndrome. LDL is not.
Read 6 tweets
13 Dec 20
Today's FoD is being substitued by a thread of quotes from the below article
Explains how, in 1965, The Sugar Research Foundation (SRF)/Sugar Industry bought off scientists to promote sugar+demonize fats.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
A Must read
Cred to .@ProfTimNoakes lecture
The Sugar Research Foundation (SRF) became concerned with evidence showing that a low-fat [high-carb] diet high in sugar could elevate serum cholesterol level…
The SRF’s vice president and director of research, John Hickson, started closely monitoring the field…
Hickson proposed that the SRF “could embark on a major program” to counter “negative attitudes toward sugar.” …
In 1965, the SRF asked Fredrick Stare, chair of the Harvard University School of Public Health Nutrition Department to join its SRFs scientific advisory board
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(