@shipwreckedcrew the person most responsible for burying the Danchenko information was SIA Brian Auten. He appears to have disseminated 2-page summary memo, which concealed inconsistencies arising from Danchenko interview, while not distributing
the 57-page memorandum on Danchenko, other than
@shipwreckedcrew 2/ placing it in the Crossfire case file, where it appears to have remained unread until re-discovered by Horowitz. At least, all FBI officials senior to Auten profess ignorance of the document and that they know nothing except what was in 2-page memorandum.
@shipwreckedcrew 3/ this seems surprisingly incurious to me, but not impossible. From a professional perspective, how plausible is it that information in Auten's 57 page memo did in fact remain unknown to FBI officials?
@shipwreckedcrew 4/ a second oddity in failure to disseminate is that Auten pointed at the interviewing Case Agent as having responsibility. Somma transferred out of active Crossfire in Feb 2017 (more or less as Danchenko EC was being finalized).
@shipwreckedcrew 5/ a still unidentified WFO agent assumed carriage of Danchenko and interviewed him again in March and May 2017, but appointment of Mueller put an end to all efforts to validate Steele.
@shipwreckedcrew 6/ SSA Pientka had commenced extended validation of Steele in early Nov 2016 after Steele termination, but he was countermanded by Priestap and McCabe who ordered stop to Steele validation. Pientka transferred out of Crossfire in protest (tho he did some subsequent odd jobs).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen McIntyre

Stephen McIntyre Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ClimateAudit

23 May
1/ @BarryMeier's exemplar Steele dossier incident - both in book and Isikoff interview - was the Michael Cohen in Prague incident, rather than the memos attributed to "Millian" that were relied on in ICA and Page FISA.
2/ it prompted me to reflect a little on Steele reports on Cohen incident, which I haven't thought much about, since Cohen visit to Prague was disproved early on, tho McClatchy later published allegation of Cohen phone being pinged in Prague. mcclatchydc.com/news/investiga…
3/ Cohen's name is first mentioned in Steele memos on three consecutive days in October (18, 19, 20), then again in the non-DNC memo on Dec 13.
Read 14 tweets
18 May
@mtaibbi the ICA is the key. Focus on Carter Page FISA has been Look Squirrel distraction. Steele info did not meet IC quality standards but included anyway because Obama (orally) said to include "everything", which McCabe used as authorization/instruction to include Steele fabrications
@mtaibbi 2/ many questions about ICA remain unanswered and even unasked. There does not appear to be any purpose for including Steele "information" other than to leak it. (as I recall) Strzok/Page speculated in early Jan on leaks from senior WH.
@mtaibbi 3/ was there any purpose in such a rushed ICA other than to boobytrap and undermine the incoming administration? Everyone involved is smart and cunning, so each step undoubtedly has a color of right, but net result of ICA was to commence resistance against Trump.
Read 4 tweets
15 May
@ReginaMourad @BarryMeier @HansMahncke @MonsieursGhost Meier talked to me. He discusses our Twitter work in a section of his book, but manages to get almost every nuance wrong. He's a good journalist but misunderstood our perspective almost totally.
@ReginaMourad @BarryMeier @HansMahncke @MonsieursGhost my initial reaction to @BarryMeier was over-focused on frustration with some unfairness to our twitter corner. To be balanced, I should also have pointed out that his critique of Steele et al (and I intend to read book) appears to be very severe in MSM terms.
@ReginaMourad @BarryMeier @HansMahncke @MonsieursGhost 2/ Meier pointed out that Steele's supposed role in Litvinenko affair had much inflated (just as his role in FIFA was.) The Litvinenko affair was a long-standing interest of his. Image
Read 14 tweets
14 May
as Mark Twain and Satchell Paige said, “It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so.“ Following what we were told was "the science" on droplets was a bad mistake. Precautions for droplets didn't work against aerosols.
here is fascinating story of how one scientist disentangled the role of aerosols in spread of COVID.
wired.com/story/the-teen…
there's an important moral to the distinction between aerosols and droplets in how to effectively forestall spread. Spending money on improved ventilation systems in a Hong Kong university as opposed to spending same amount of money on mass testing.
Read 5 tweets
11 May
three weeks ago, when Ontario Science Table was in full volume doomcasting stratospheric exponential COVID, I surmised that a Gompertz top was forming and that there were grounds for optimism, becoming increasingly optimistic as doomsters became gloomier
my surmise that mid-April was Gompertz top seems to have been prescient. Ontario cases are now less than 50% of top of Gompertz curve, declining rapidly against all expectations of Ontario Science Table. Hospitalizations following with lag.
3/ in mid-Apr, Ontario govt @fordnation mostly resisted demands of public sector privileged academics for more draconian lockdowns and/or additional burdens on the local businesses upon whom entire economic burden of lockdown has been imposed, though they
Read 7 tweets
11 May
imagine a citizenry which places a "high premium on data analysis and empiricism". Or which believes that "science is a process, and not an institution". Or which expects data used by policy-makers to be analysable.

Such citizens have long been hated by climate "community",
2/ the appropriate response of institutions should be to make the data available, improve their analytic and statistical skills, acknowledge errors graciously.

More or less the opposite strategy to the climate "community".
3/ we've also learned over past few years that institutions expect citizens to set aside their expectations of a "high premium on data analysis and empiricism" when it comes to diktats ("assessments") by intelligence community.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(