Jethmalani: A stay has been granted now in this matter.
My request is plea by Rashmi Shukla, two pleas by Singh and the State’s plea may be kept together before the same bench.
Court asks Adv Satish Talekar who appears for the complainant.
Court: Now we are sitting in this combination for this week. We are sitting in this combination for this week, next week I will be sitting with another judge.
We want to finally hear the matter and decide.
Court: I want all of you to rethink. IF you want to be properly heard.
Jethmalani, Khambata, ASG Singh is also there, you are also there.
Khambata: The grounds are similar, they suppressed before the Supreme Court that the matter was heard and I had made a statement to not arrest.
That disclosure was not made, if that is not abuse of process, then I do not what is.
Court: If the Supreme Court is going to hear this plea, then we will have to hold our hands.
Jethmalani: That petition is about continuous harassment. It is by a series of FIRs filed by the State. It is a continuous case of vendetta against this gentleman.
Jethmalani: Hence we filed a omnibus petition under Art 32 against all the FIRs.
When this matter was heard before the Bench of Justice Kathawalla, a day before the hearing, the complainant served on us an affidavit of over 400 pages.
Bali: I will explain what the case is in Supreme Court.
I have informed that the Supreme Court that they started dept enquiries against me, the current CP recused himself from the enquiry and any other complaint which the state has against me, should be transferred to #CBI
Bali: I stand before you with full responsibility.
The order passed in our favour was shown to the Supreme Court, it was sent via email. Why would we not want to disclose an order in our favour?
Court: Mr Bali, now whether there is any date given?
Bali: Unfortunately, Mr Gavai was sitting till Friday. Now there will be change in the bench, the notification may have come out today morning. So I am told it will be listed today.
Khambata reads from the petition that their petition states that on oath, they told the Supreme Court that the Bombay High Court did not hear or refused to grant a date.
Court: Jethmalani we will be hearing you today. And as for these statements in the Supreme Court petition, please take steps to withdraw this statement.
My brother judge was on that bench that day.
Court: We respect your statement that you will advise the petitioner to withdraw this statement.
(To Talekar) Your FIR was registered in 2021. Your grievance is of 2015-16.
Subject to what Mr. Khambata says, we propose to fix the matter after 2 weeks after re-opening.
Talekar: The interim may not continue.
Court: Mr. Khambata made a statement earlier.
Khambata: The petition was filed on April 30, 2021. Thereafter it came up for hearing on May 13. The documents came to me in the morning, I wanted to put a counter, hence I sought time.
Court: What we propose to do is we will keep it for hearing on April 9, we will hear finally subject to whatever you have to say, so that there is a regular bench to hear it.
Khambata: I have instructions, that they will not proceed before the Supreme Court up until the hearing happens on June 9, then I will not take coercive action against them till June 9.
Khambata makes a statement that the State will not take any action in this particular FIR, subject to his co-operation in the investigation and not moving the Supreme Court for this FIR.
Court: Khambata has instructions only for this FIR.
Jethmalani: In fact I would tell Mr Bali that you please delete any reference to this FIR from the petition. They are right, you cannot ride two horses!
Jethmalani on instructions makes a statement that in light of the protection granted to the petitioner in this FIR, he will not be pressing the petition in the Supreme Court.
Khambata’s statement of subjective no-coercive action is already recorded.
Order:
There is a consensus amongst counsel appearing for the party, and preferably on June 9, 2021.
In view of the consensus arisen, list on June 9, 2021 for final disposal before the regular bench.
Khambata: If the regular bench cannot hear the matter for any reason, Mr. Jethmalani can always move the application for interim order.
Court: Our expectation is that precise written notes be given so that will be of great assistance to us. We are happy at the end consensus is arrived at.
Adv Dhananajay Grover mentions matter concerning #FarmersProtests : Tomorrow. May 26 will mark 6 months of farmer protests. Harvest season is over. BKU and farmer unions are coming to Delhi ...
Supreme Court vacation bench to shortly hear a plea claiming that #PostPollViolence in West Bengal has led to an exodus of people and internal displacement in the State. Seeks immediate relief for the "internally displaced" #SupremeCourt @MamataOfficial @BJP4Bengal
The plea seeks directions to Centre to discharge its duty vested under Article 355 of the Constitution of India to protect the state from internal disturbance.
Further, to constitute a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to investigate the incidents of political violence
Supreme Court Bench headed by Justice Ashok Bhushan hears a plea seeking ex gratia monetary compensation of Rs. 4 lacs or notified ex gratia monetary compensation to the families of deceased who have succumbed to the #COVID19 pandemic
Justice Ashok Bhushan: Where is the letter dated April 8, 2015?
Advocate Gaurav Kumar Bhansal: in that letter it stated that all states were directed to implement this scheme
Senior Adv SB Upadhyay: we are seeking that giving effect to Section 12, a certificate needs to be issued that death is due to #covid ... there are cases where the bodies are being taken from mortuary to cremation ground. there needs to be a certificate
The CBI has, however, requested that hearing be deferred since it has approached Supreme Court challenging the May 21 order of High Court which has allowed the TMC leader to be placed under house arrest instead of jail.