1/🧵If education was a priority as government says, then they would be doing all they can to prevent the disruption caused by outbreaks and isolation.
So why haven't they invested in ventilation? Why scrap masks in secondaries?
2/ In fact the government seems comfortable with infections in younger age groups, the argument (ignoring long covid) is that children are low risk and the government’s aim is to keep down hospitalisation and deaths ie the NHS won't collapse from outbreaks in schools
But this wasn't their own priority it was "keeping schools" open, they and their client journalists keep saying how concerned they are by lost learning.
They are investing heavily in a national tutoring programme to show how much they are concerned
4/ They clearly recognise that cases and subsequent isolations impact on education as they are trialling replacing isolation with LFDs without even seeking proper consent to try and solve this issue.
5/ So where are the attempts to control transmission in schools?
They argue transmission generally isn't occurring in schools but at the school gates and community, they argue parents are the index cases although ONS data says otherwise.
6/ So to protect schools they need to keep community transmission down, they need to be transparent and open about B1.617.2 so appropriate action can be taken, otherwise the last term of school could be a disrupted disaster from outbreaks.
7/ I get the feeling we will have a summer term of people on holiday and in pubs being celebrated by papers while they ignore regular outbreaks, isolations and disruption to education.
And which communities and students are most likely to get hit hardest?
8/ That's right, vulnerable and disadvantaged students.
I bet many of the "children need to be in school at all costs, what about the learning gap" types in the media
won't care about disruptive outbreaks in schools once they've got their pint and flights booked.
9/ If they did care they would be demanding to know why the government is suppressing data on B1.617.2 outbreaks in education.
10/ If they don't care about infections and don't care about disruption from outbreaks, what do they care about?
I was thinking a return to normality in schools encourages parents to return to normal spending patterns, but ventilation wouldn't be noticeable.
11/ Can't get rid of the thought that in the 14 months since we were told "herd immunity was the strategy" masks were only recommended in classrooms for 8 weeks, and that was only in secondary schools.
What other countries have done that?
12/ While some things the Government is doing like sequencing, testing water samples, speeding up 2nd doses, are really good. What they do with this great data collection is just confusing
Tying to fight a virus whilst also pleasing lobbyists doesn't work
Cummings said the Telegraph kept swaying Johnsons mind.
This is definitely the case with school policy,
Been charting how the disinformation leads policy every month
Skeptics➡️contrarian blue ticks➡️ Telegraph&CRG➡️Johnson changes policy #edutwitter
Media have been most negligent about schools policy complicit in dismissing safety concerns, unfortunately schools were barely mentioned in the meeting. Id like to know what Gupta and Henegan advised on schools.
March 2020 we called for schools to close
Herd immunity was the strategy and Gov spokesman said closing schools would be counter productive as it would reduce infection, transmission didn't just occur in schools it was vital 1/ #edutwitter#r4today
2/ When 1st lockdown was announced there was a mas scramble to define keyworkers, set down guidence for remote learning etc.
No preparatory work had been done because they had intended on keeping schools open throughout but impact on transmission was too risky
3/ From April 2020 the message suddenly changed from schools as essential vectors of transmission to gain natural immunity in low risk groups, to "children don't transmit" "transmission in schools is low" "school gates..."
"Transmission very low because of measures like social distancing, improved ventilation, mask wearing"
Presenter: "how long do we need to keep these measures in place?"
V: "social distancing will need to remain in place for now"
FFS Have I slipped into a parallel universe where Johnson and co actually care about safety of the school population rather than almost willfully wanted to get us infected.
Viner has been DfEs go to expert to support its policies.
Johnson has spent more on takeaways than the government has spent on ventilation in schools.
The cost of his private plane and paint job would have covered the costs of having real meaningful air filtration in schools.
Not a penny has been spent on ventilation, Viner knows this
1/🧵Government, PHE and the Media
Where is the science on schools policy? (AGAIN!)
Politics is about controlling the narrative,and this weekend shows many examples of how government does this facilitated by pliant media sources
It begins with suppressing and manipulating data.
2/ We know PHE have data on B1.617.2 cases in education settings, been asking for this for weeks, before masks were removed from classrooms. It was suspicious they wouldn't provide the data before that decision.
1/🧵Watching this years annual teaching apprenticeship debate, its got me thinking about a major issue with our education system that gets spoken about a lot but is never properly addressed.
Apprenticeships
Going to be some half formed thoughts and impressions, be gentle
2/ Main argument against seems to be about standards and subject knowledge.
My first instrinct is this is an argument about content and structure of a course rather than the basic concept.
3/ "Cant develop the depth of subject knowledge required over a 3/4 year apprenticeship"
I'm wondering how many teachers teach a subject they don't have a degree in? As a whole ppl are fine for someone with QTS to teach other subjects if they take a knowledge enhancement course
1/🧵Had a call from @carolecadwalla about this story this morning, pleased to see the guardian hunting for the truth, horrified that yet again Johnson appears to be again suppressing information
If schools are acting as reservoirs amplifying transmission we deserve to know!
So my thoughts why this data is needed and how the government actually needs a more comprehensive plan for B1.617.2, particularly if its circulating in schools.
Scientists and Unions have had a constant battle with gov on schools data.
Deeply skeptical of why it appears government is blocking this data.
I notice after Hancock and Johnson describing schools as "vectors of transmission" the messaging seems to be back to children rarely infect and low risk of transmission.