Let's be crystal clear about this. If your first reaction to survivors of sexual predators is skepticism or questioning, you're literally supporting and enabling sexual predators everywhere.
Here's the thing. Sexual predators pick their targets deliberately. They look for 1/
people they can manipulate or control. Most often this is due to a power dynamic in their relationship with their victim and they use fear and shame as tools.
When you question survivors, when you speculate or attack them in public discourse, you play right into what these 2/
predators are looking for. You create the very tools they use to keep their victims quiet. And victims that are too afraid or ashamed to report are what allow a Denver public school employee to rape 62 high-school aged girls, or a film producer to harass and/or assault 3/
over 100 people.
Yes, we all understand the US legal philosophy of "innocent until proven guilty". However, that's a job for the lawyers, judges, and court system.
Innocent until proven guilty doesn't mean defend the accused. It doesn't mean attack the survivors. Yet 4/
that is what many people do when survivors report on their abusers. You, in doing so, create the very conditions that allow such behavior to occur without repercussion for years or even decades, right under our noses.
Not that it's worth delving into, but your skepticism is 5/
wholly unfounded a well. Studies and statistics show that less than 3% of sexual assault reports are false. Your questioning at attacks aren't defending the falsely accused, they're helping protect those who've not yet been accused because their victims are too afraid 6/
or ashamed to speak up, because they see your behavior.
So stop it. Stop enabling sexual predators. You don't want them living in your neighborhoods (we see those fights all the time) so stop giving them cover to commit their horrific acts.
"I want friends not fans" - This quote will stick in my head forever.
This sums up my attitudes toward infosec rockstar culture. IDC how many followers a person has, how many talks, media interviews, or books they have under their belts. We're all just humans 1/
and we all have something to learn from others and something we can teach others.
If you encounter a highly recognized person in this community who isn't willing to give you the time of day or who thinks their accomplishments make them superior to you, just walk away. 2/
They are not worth your time.
It hit 40K followers today, and it's shocking and humbling to know that there are that many people who find something interesting about what I have to say. But I would hope that any one of them would feel comfortable coming to me with 3/
On #IWD2021 let's talk about the reality of women's experience in the professional world:
1. According to study after study, women are consistently paid less than men for doing the same job. WOC make even less than their underpaid white women counterparts.
1/
2. Numerous studies have shown that in promotions, men are considered based on their potential to do the job while women are evaluated on whether they've already demonstrated the skills of the job (I've experienced this myself)
2/
3. Women are consistently assumed to have lesser technical expertise than their male peers.
4. Women are far more likely to be interrupted during meetings and have their opinions minimized or ignored.
5. Women with tattoos are more harshly judged for them than men.
3/
I know it's easy to hop on the bandwagon of shaming #infosec in Healthcare given the ransomware news over the last two days. But please before you decide to blast your theory on how healthcare is lazy, uncommitted, etc. to security, take a few moments to consider their risk 1/
models and the unprecedented level of complexity they have to deal with in terms of technology and threats. We know the challenges of ICS systems that are built once and typically can't be easily upgraded as vulnerabilities are discovered. This is 10x worse when it comes to 2/
medical devices. Now add in the complexities of EMR systems which are managing vast amounts of disparate forms of data. Far more complex than even what we see in financial services. But the complexity doesn't end there. Consider the crazy networking infrastructures needed to 3/
The more I think about this tweet, the angrier I get. This does not help your case @TwitterComms. This says not only did your training set and the team creating this model lack sufficient diversity, but apparently so did the team testing it. What makes me angry however is 1/
that this is not the first, tenth or even hundredth time we've seen models fail like this. It's talked about widely in the tech space. Yet somehow @Twitter ignored all the discussions about how to avoid these biases and instead went with pre-delivery testing as the solution 2/
to eliminating such biases? And @dantley this isn't about dunking on you or @Twitter, this is about frustration at the pattern of behavior by tech giants who utilize ML and AI without being able to sufficiently address the inherent biases they introduce. It's a disturbing 3/
A little reminder for the #hackerfit#redteamfit#blueteamfit#gitfit folks out there. Keep your eye on the big picture. One of the things has helped me most is this trend line. If you look data plots, you can see how my weight fluctuates up and down a lot. It is easy to 1/
get discouraged in those moments, but having the trend line allows me to see the big picture. No matter how I plateau or fluctuate, it remains in a downward slant. That reminds me that my setbacks are momentary and that I am doing the right things. Even when my heart feels 2/
the frustration, my logical mind sees that line and knows it's alright. In the end, I hit my goal while losing an average of 2.24lbs/week which is right in line with my plan of 2 lbs per week (what most agree is the most aggressive rate of loss you should target). So whether 3/
With #IStandWithJKRowling trending as she returns an award she didn't deserve, it's important to point out a few things.
1. Her whole premise is based on the faulty logic that allowing trans people to pee and poop in the bathroom that matches their gender somehow erases sex. 1/
2. She, like those who say #IStandWithJKRowling, reference 1950's science in their argument, while ignoring 70 years of deeper investigation that has discovered many of the realities of gender vs body sex characteristics. 2/
3. Nothing in her rhetoric, or that of the #IStandWithJKRowling crowd who claim not to be transphobic, ever once seeks to open a dialogue focused on solutions. Instead it's always focused on telling others what they can and can't do with their own bodies. 3/