Great scoop by the @nytimes but with all due respect... The scoop isn’t in the sensational headline. It’s in the body of the story suggesting whatever the UFO’s are, they aren’t our technology. THAT IS A MONUMENTAL DEAL. nytimes.com/2021/06/03/us/…
Quick & very basic overview on what UAP/UFO’s could be.
1.Secret Government Project ❌
2.Foreign Adversary ❓
3.Private tech development ❓
4.Something else ❓
The #NYT appears to be ruling out the 1st option. But why is headline is about aliens 🤔
1.Secret Government Project ❌
2.Foreign Adversary ❓
3.Private tech development ❓
4.Something else ❓
The #NYT appears to be ruling out the 1st option. But why is headline is about aliens 🤔
For decades the stigma surrounded UFO’s has come from our pavlovian reaction that it must mean aliens. But in doing so we ignore so much about physics that is still beyond our grasp. We might not even fully understand how lift works! (H/T @DietrichVFA41) scientificamerican.com/article/no-one…
From what I’ve seen on and off the record, many of these may turn out to be tech from adversaries. Which could represent a terrifying paradigm shift in the future of warfare.
But it’s important to note that those same foreign adversaries have reported their own unexplained encounters with aerial & submerged phenomenon going back decades.
As for the 4th option. We don’t know what we don’t know. But as a reporter I have a pretty decent radar for doublespeak... and hearing someone saying “we have no indication that something is xxx” CAN ALSO MEAN “we have no indication that something isn’t xxx.”
P.S. I only added the third option cause I live in LA & we still don’t know who is flying around like rocketman with a jet pack & freaking out pilots at LAX. google.com/amp/s/www.toda…
P.S.S. For the record, I’m agnostic on the whole 👽 question. When it comes to UAP’s, all I know for a fact is that there are things in the sky that move in ways we can’t explain.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
