US government was accused of banning exports of vaccine-making supplies, most notably to India. New supply chain data reveals there was never a US export ban. But the episode highlights a problem demanding new policy.

My latest, with @ChrisGHRogers 🧵 1/
piie.com/blogs/trade-an…
India is being devastated by the pandemic right now. It needs more vaccines at home, and it needs equipment to make more vaccines for home... 2/

nytimes.com/article/india-…
Worse, Indian companies had also been expected to play a major role in providing billions of vaccine doses to poor countries globally through Covax.

Hopes were high as late as February 2021. By March, hopes were dashed, and the Serum Institute stopped exporting... 3/
Inputs to make vaccines are in short supply globally. [More on contributing causes why below]

But this tweet by Adar Poonawalla, CEO of @SerumInstIndia brought things to a head with the accusation of a US "embargo" on vaccine-making supplies... 4/

NEW DATA: There was never a US export embargo to the Serum Institute of India.

US exports were up 30% between October 2020 and March 2021 (relative to prior 6 months), including from vaccine input suppliers (ABEC, Merck Millipore, Cytiva, Pall, Thermo Fisher, Sartorius)... 5/
Similarly, Biological E, with a license to manufacture both Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) vaccine and the candidate from Baylor/Dynavax (neither yet authorized by Indian regulators, a separate issue) had also made complaints of US export restrictions... 6/
ft.com/content/7225cb…
NEW DATA: There was never a US ban on exports to Biological E either. US exports to Biological E between October 2020 and March 2021 were 220% higher than the previous 6 months, also from major US-based suppliers of vaccine equipment and materials... 7/
Note: the US policy response in April was to send immediate vaccine-making supplies to India... 8/
But we need to get to the source of the shortage problem of vaccine-making equipment and material inputs, and deploy POLICY to make sure *THAT* does not hold back global vaccine production.

So what is the problem?

Making vaccines requires A LOT of specialized inputs... 9/
Serum Institute is producing the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine.

@CliveHGlover a scientist at Pall, one of the key equipment providers, explained the benefit of using the SAME inputs at all of the AstraZeneca sites:
🤓👉🏾 pall.com/en/biotech/blo… ... 10/
Standardizing AstraZeneca production would have tradeoffs.

[+ ,😀] speed at which each new facility could scale up production of a consistent drug product.

[- ,☹️] it may concentrate—and lock in—demand for equipment into a limited number of suppliers... 11/
PROBLEM: Serum Institute is competing with A LOT of other production facilities globally to buy that same equipment to start making the Oxford / AstraZeneca vaccine

Benefits of using the same inputs are only realized if there is enough standardized equipment to go around... 12/
Same for Serum Institute complaints about needing equipment and raw materials to manufacture the Novavax vaccine.

If that equipment is common across Novavax plants, Serum Institute is competing for the same materials from the same few supplier companies at the same time.... 13/
A NEW AND GLOBAL COVID-19 VACCINE SUPPLY CHAIN POLICY IS NEEDED

Much of the uncertainty is now gone.
Dozens of facilities making vaccines have been established globally. Trade data shows their relationships with suppliers.

Policymakers: LEVERAGE that information... 14/
FIVE STEP PLAN

1. Regularly survey the dozens of now-established COVID-19 vaccine production facilities about their critical inputs.

How much do they need, from which companies, from where are those being supplied, and on what time schedule? 15/
2. Once that information has been collected for each facility, aggregate it up to the level of the input supplier.

How many bioreactor bags are needed from Cytiva versus Thermo Fisher. How many filters are needed from Merck Millipore, etc. 16/
3. Separately survey the major input suppliers identified in step 2.

Cross-check whether each input supplier’s pending orders match the information from the vaccine facilities. 17/
4. Identify potential input shortages.

Whenever step 3 reveals a supplier as not having sufficient capacity to meet all of the demand on time, some sort of policy intervention is needed. 18/
5. Determine whether the shortage is impacting a customized input, and tailor the policy response accordingly

Customized...
...Short-run: incentivize wartime-like-effort, running second, third, weekend shifts.

...Long-run: incentivize investment needed to expand capacity 19/
5. (cont) Determine whether the shortage is impacting a customized input, and tailor the policy response accordingly

NON-customized inputs:

Use the step 3 information to help find temporary alternative suppliers. 20/
Policymakers: print out this CHEAT SHEET and put it on the refrigerator... 21/
US policymakers did some of the 5-step process for US vaccine makers through Operation Warp Speed and the Defense Production Act.

The Indian experience shows why the US can not and should not attempt to manage this five-step process alone. 22/
Transparency in the global vaccine supply chain will also improve trust. That may heighten cooperation and be a reminder that, in the COVID-19 pandemic, we are all in this together.

(comments welcome) ENDS/
piie.com/blogs/trade-an…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Chad P. Bown

Chad P. Bown Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChadBown

21 Apr
VACCINES 🧵

1) Yes, policymakers & companies must address IP / tech transfer

2) But another bottleneck is how COUNTRIES cooperate to get vaccine manufacturing scaled up globally

Thanks @Aime_Williams for describing a proposal by @TomBollyky & me... 1/
ft.com/content/f230e4…
.@TomBollyky and I have proposed a Covid-19 Vaccine Investment and Trade Agreement (CVITA)... 2/ Image
The problem to solve:

The vaccine manufacturing supply chain is complex.

(Reflexively we think "Big Pharma," but that is NOT reality for Covid-19 vaccines)

THIS supply chain is highly fragmented & requires considerable coordination to get ANY vaccines manufactured at all 3/ Image
Read 7 tweets
18 Mar
Vaccine export restrictions and viral variants are the symptoms. The world is struggling to contain the COVID-19 pandemic. What to do?

Scale up 'Operation Warp Speed' globally, to get billions of doses to a world in need.

My latest, with @TomBollyky 1/
piie.com/blogs/trade-an…
"Woah!!!," you say.

Let me explain.

The development of several effective COVID-19 vaccines in less than a year is an historic achievement.

Hundreds of millions of doses have been manufactured and distributed in the United States.

The speed and scale is unprecedented...

2/
Yet, understanding the success of 'Operation Warp Speed' requires understanding the fragmented vaccine manufacturing supply chain.

LOTS of small companies. LOTS of critical inputs. LOTS of steps.

One missing input could grind the entire supply chain to a halt...

3/
Read 12 tweets
8 Feb
In late 2019, China agreed to buy tens of billions of dollars of additional US exports in 2020 under Trump's Phase One deal.

That didn't happen. Here’s why.

My latest 1/
piie.com/blogs/trade-an…
First, the good news.

China actually bought more from the US in 2020 than in 2019, including of those "phase one" products.

China even bought relatively more from the US of those goods than it bought from the rest of the world... 2/
But both comparisons are irrelevant for the LEGAL agreement. (Read the text.)

Under the threat of continued tariff escalation, Trump convinced Beijing in December 2019 to commit to an additional $200bn on top of *2017* trade flows—not 2019.

In 2020, China fell 41% short... 3/
Read 15 tweets
27 Jan
NEW: China’s purchases of US goods were over 40 percent short of its total commitment for 2020 found in the Phase One trade agreement.

Official December US export statistics released today, closing the book on US-China goods trade for 2020... 1/
piie.com/research/piie-…
The Phase One deal has 3 sectoral targets. Of those, China's purchases of US farm products were least bad. (Makes political sense)

According to US export statistics, China's purchases came up short in 2020 by
• 18% for agriculture
• 43% for manufacturing
• 63% for energy

2/ Image
For #TradeTwitter, of interest is the sizeable GAP in farm purchases between Chinese import and US export statistics.

Ie, China's purchases of covered agricultural products reached 82% of target based on US export data BUT ONLY 64% based on Chinese import data. 🤔🤔🤔

3/
Read 5 tweets
27 Jan
Two ways to view European Commission decision to demand "export controls" on EU-manufactured vaccines

Vaccine nationalism? (worry)

or

A policy to create new information to solve a problem? (hope)

A short thread 1/...

VACCINE NATIONALISM 2/

First, the worry.

Hoarding. The EU is one of the few places that can manufacture vaccines.

To end the pandemic, the EU must **EXPORT** vaccines globally.

A EU vaccine export ban would be BAD. BAD. BAD. BAD. BAD for global public health.
VACCINE NATIONALISM 3/

EU export limits are also not surprising. It was predicted early, often, and by many.

The new policy results from a failure to globally commit to solve the distribution problem, despite Covax efforts.

(eg, this from July 2020)
foreignaffairs.com/articles/unite…
Read 10 tweets
23 Dec 20
More downside to US unilateralism. Even to protect national security.

European semiconductor and equipment makers accuse US of using export controls on Huawei and SMIC to shut them out of the Chinese market, while exempting US companies.

By @YuanfenYang
ft.com/content/7baa8c…
This is one of the fears identified in this piece

👉🏾 piie.com/system/files/d…
Multilateralizing export controls is hard. But the failure to do so could end up undermining the underlying rationale - the protection of national security - and punish American companies' commercial interests in the long run.

piie.com/publications/w…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(