-BT did not invent vaping
-Vapes are a direct competitor to cigarettes and are a huge disruptive threat to the industry
-BT is mostly focussed on #HTPs
-If BT switches from #cigs to #ecigs, that is good for public health. vaping is 95% safer
2. Popcorn lung has been long discredited
There has never been a single case of 'popcorn lung' from vaping or smoking, and diacetyl levels are hundreds of times higher in smoke than vapour
It is now clear that 'EVALI' was due to contaminated illicit THC oils. Not a single case has been linked to commercial nicotine vaping. Some denied THC use, most likely because it was illegal
Maintaining doubt is harmful to public health bit.ly/3gwsGxM
4. Most kids who vape have smoked first
(Note to Ms Bittoun)
-Most teens smoke b4 vaping
-Kids who vape are risk-takers and are more likely to smoke, drink etc
-Regular vaping is rare in non-smokers
-Vaping is diverting far more youth away from smoking
(note to Ms Bittoun)
-Nicotine may harm rodent brains in lab studies
-There is no evidence that nicotine harms the human adolescent brain
-No evidence that hundreds of millions adults who smoked as teens have brain damage
6. Addiction to nicotine
(note to Ms Bittoun)
-Dependence on nicotine is rare in non-smoking youth who vape (West 2019; RCP 2021)
-Smoke contains other chemicals that make nicotine more addictive
-Most non-smokers vape infrequently and are at low-risk
-Many do not use nicotine
7. Vaping does not cause seizures
-Nicotine overdose can cause seizures
-There is no evidence that vaping causes seizures with normal use
-Even smoking does not cause seizures!
-Kids should not vape and illicit sales should be policed
-But harsh restrictions on vaping because of small or potential risks to youth will reduce access for adult smokers for whom vaping could be life-saving
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The addictiveness of nicotine depends on how it is delivered. Smoking is highly addictive due to rapid nicotine delivery and other chemicals in smoke. Vaping is significantly less addictive than smoking
3/ doctors should be focused on getting people off cigarettes and nicotine completely
Ideally yes. But many smokers can't quit nicotine and switching to a safer alternative is lifesaving. The focus of #THR is reducing disease, not ceasing nicotine
▪️Smoking is the largest risk factor for cancer
▪️Vaping is estimated to be <0.5% the cancer risk of smoking
▪️Most of the carcinogens in smoke are absent from vapour or in very small amounts
2/ "We don’t know what the long-term consequences are going to be”
It is beyond reasonable doubt that #vaping will be far less risky than smoking. @RCPLondon estimates that the long-term risk is likely to be no more than 5% of the risk of smoking
3/ “Very easy to get nicotine for #vaping from the doctor”
Actually no. The process is
▪️Complex & time-consuming for GPs
▪️Delayed by @TGAgovau approval
▪️Importing by a 3rd party
▪️Import permit needed
▪️Much more costly
It will be easier to go next door and buy a cigarette!
2/ "tobacco industry application to relax poison controls and greenlight the sale of novelty tobacco products being heavily promoted to young people in the US"
NO. This is for heated tobacco products NOT #vaping. #HTPs have been approved by the FDA.
Please learn the difference
3/ "unfounded claims about the benefits of #ecigs in smoking cessation"
NO. The evidence is very clear that vaping is more effective than other quitting aids and could significantly reduce Australia's smoking rate bit.ly/2Z6m804
2/5 'The 95% safer figure is a factoid based on opinion'
WRONG. This is based on comprehensive reviews by @RCPLondon and @PHE_uk. It is consistent with the substantial reduction in toxins, the reduced biomarkers and improved health in smokers who switch athra.org.au/blog/2019/12/2…
3/5 'Long-term risk. It took 40 years to find out the effects of smoking'
Science has come a long way since then. Smoke contains >7000 chemicals, vapour <300. Chemicals in vapour are mostly <1% concentration in smoke. @RCPLondon says the long-term risk is <5% risk of smoking.
@SarahWhisar says about #vaping 'The 95% factoid was a consensus OPINION reached by a small panel, some of whom had conflicts of interest - it is not at all evidence-based'
My response in the thread below
1/8 With respect Sarah, that is a misleading response which omits the full story. The 95% figure was first developed by leading experts based on the best available evidence at the time in a validated MCDA process. @ProfDavidNutt replied to the criticism bit.ly/32dPV76
2/8 It was then independently confirmed by @PHE_uk in 2015 and 2018 based on
The toxins in smoke 1. are most absent from vapour 2. Those present are mostly <1% of smoke
The main chemicals that are in #ecigs-only are not associated with any serious risk bit.ly/1J2Zsj2