, 10 tweets, 6 min read Read on Twitter
@SarahWhisar says about #vaping 'The 95% factoid was a consensus OPINION reached by a small panel, some of whom had conflicts of interest - it is not at all evidence-based'

My response in the thread below
1/8 With respect Sarah, that is a misleading response which omits the full story. The 95% figure was first developed by leading experts based on the best available evidence at the time in a validated MCDA process. @ProfDavidNutt replied to the criticism
bit.ly/32dPV76
2/8 It was then independently confirmed by @PHE_uk in 2015 and 2018 based on
The toxins in smoke
1. are most absent from vapour
2. Those present are mostly <1% of smoke
The main chemicals that are in #ecigs-only are not associated with any serious risk
bit.ly/1J2Zsj2
3/8 Independently confirmed again by @RCPLondon in 2016
'the hazard to health arising from long-term vapour inhalation from the #ecigs available today is unlikely to exceed 5% of the harm from smoking tobacco'
bit.ly/244lizV
4/8 Chen, @DrChrisBullen et al used a different methodology but reached the same conclusion
'Our findings provide evidence that supports the Public Health England statement but was arrived at by applying a different methodology'
bit.ly/2NGPDBJ
5/8 @robertjwest agrees, in a report to the UK Parliamentary Inquiry
'The precise extent of harm from long-term use is not known but has been estimated at around 1/20th that of smoking tobacco cigarettes'
bit.ly/2LgQtSL
6/8 It supported by other reviews by Burstyn, @FarsalinosK, @PeterHajek and others. There are currently no identified serious health risks from vaping. Stephens estimated that the risk of cancer is <0.5% that of smoking.
bit.ly/2tGBHPR
7/8 The 95% figure is consistent with the toxicology of vapour compared to smoking, biomarker studies and improvements in health and wellbeing when smokers switch to vaping
bit.ly/2ln5dkv
8/8 @Clive_Bates says the 95% safer figure is a quantified estimate provided as a guide to the public, not an exact number. Statements like 'substantially lower risk' are highly ambiguous.

Could you please advise how much safer you think #ecigs are than smoking?
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Colin Mendelsohn
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!