My mom & dad bought their first house in #PaloAlto for about $16,000. At the time, it cost about 5 cents per hour to park downtown. Today, that same house would cost ~$3 million & it’s free to park downtown.
We have completely solved our affordable housing problem–for our cars🧵
In 2019, surveyors counted 313 homeless people in #PaloAlto, up 99% from 2013. They found no homeless cars.
How did #PaloAlto become a city of expensive housing and free parking? In 1951, Palo Alto adopted a new zoning ordinance. The new law limited housing and required parking.
In subsequent years, #PaloAlto passed strict laws demanding more and more parking at more and more land uses. By 2004, a 2-bedroom apartment couldn't be built unless it included 2.2 parking spaces.
L: fourplex, before minimum parking laws
R: fourplex, after minimum parking laws
(Last time I checked, #PaloAlto renters owned an average of just 1.4 vehicles/household, according to Census data.)
When #PaloAlto first adopted minimum parking laws, #RonaldReagan and Diana Lynn were starring in Bedtime for Bonzo. Like Bedtime for Bonzo, Palo Alto's minimum parking regulations were surely well-intentioned, and considered modern at the time.
Unfortunately, minimum parking laws haven’t aged as well as Bedtime for Bonzo. President Reagan’s star turn remains an enjoyable light comedy. Minimum parking laws have turned out to be a tragedy.
A large body of research has now shown that minimum parking regulations increase housing costs, harm low-income families, damage our economy, and increase vehicle trips and pollution.
The cost of building, operating, and maintaining a parking garage in #PaloAlto typically exceeds $300 per month per parking space, every year for the expected 35-year useful life of the structure.
At first, builders bear this cost, but they pass the costs along in the form of higher rents. A @Sightline study of Seattle-area apartments concluded that parking costs increase rents by approximately 15%, or $246 per month for each occupied apartment.
Research by Santa Clara University’s C.J. Gabbe and UCLA’s Gregory Pierce found that nationwide, bundling the cost of a garage space into rents “adds about 17 percent to a unit’s rent”.
“Minimum parking requirements create a major equity problem for carless households”, they write. The regulations force carless – generally low-income – people to pay higher rents for parking they don’t need and can’t use.
For many, a 17% rent increase is the difference between a roof over your family’s head and an eviction notice.
Conversely, removing minimum parking regulations lowers rents and home prices. #UCBerkeley researchers Wenyu Jia and Martin Wachs found that in #SanFrancisco, 20% more households could qualify for loans on condominiums without parking.
For example, #Tucson allows each property to have no more than one residential parking permit for each legal curb parking space in front it – regardless of how many homes are added to the property.
Reform #2: Return any revenue generated by pricing curb parking to the neighborhood where it is generated, to pay for public improvements. Local revenue return helps make parking pricing popular.
Reform #3: Follow the advice given by Institute of Transportation Engineers International President Bruce Belmore: “Eliminate mandatory minimum parking requirements”.
Removing minimum parking laws makes housing more affordable and sustainable. For example, at #Berkeley’s Gaia Building the developer built 42 parking spaces to serve 91 apartments, a theater, a café, and office space.
The Gaia Building’s car-free homes rent for substantially less than comparable apartments nearby that come with parking included. For those who want it, parking is available, for $230 per space per month. The result? 237 adult residents with just 20 cars.
Legalizing car-free homes lets people who cannot afford a car save money on parking. In return, they spare all of us from traffic congestion and pollution.
Minimum parking laws have been a great planning disaster. They have raised rents and worsened homelessness. They are unfair, inequitable, economically damaging, and environmentally destructive.
By repealing these misguided laws, some cities have done their part to solve our shared regional crises: homelessness, traffic jams, dirty air, and climate change. But too many haven't – including #PaloAlto.
That’s why the state legislature should step in, by passing #AB1401. AB 1401 prohibits minimum parking regulations within half a mile of transit stations, with the exception of spaces for electric car charging and people with disabilities.
#AB1401 will let individuals decide whether they want to rent a home with parking, or without. My friend Bill, who is blind, will no longer be forced to pay higher rents for parking spaces he doesn’t want and can’t use.
Or consider the 19% of California community college students who suffered from homelessness in 2019. For many of them, being allowed to rent a more affordable car-free apartment will mean sleeping in a safe bed instead of on the streets.
#AB1401 lets individuals decide whether they want to rent a home with parking, or without. That's fair. People who cannot afford or choose not to own a car should not have to pay anything for parking.
When you read about homelessness in #GrantsPass, #Oregon, remember one thing. For more than half a century, the city has adopted, enforced, and defended laws that push people into homelessness.
Consider just one of them...🧵/1
For decades, Grants Pass has imposed off-street parking mandates. Since at least 1961, researchers have warned that these regulations limit the supply of housing and drive up its cost. The city adopted them anyway. /2
In its quest to ensure ample free parking at every destination, Grants Pass mandated parking for every conceivable land-use, including a minimum of 1 space per five inmates at a prison and 6 spaces “per line” at a bowling alley. (Huh?) /3
Owners of even the cheapest fleabag motels know they must keep track of how many rooms they have & whether they are empty or full.
But today, the year’s busiest shopping day, most retail areas won’t be tracking how many parking spots they have & whether they are empty or full.🧵
This helps explain why so many cities have ill-advised parking policies that frustrate customers, damage economies, waste taxpayer dollars, worsen traffic jams, and, all too often, end with motorists brawling over parking spots.
Let me suggest a few solutions. /2
When I lead studies of retail districts, like downtown #VenturaCA, business owners, managers, planners, & politicians often tell me that their shopping area has a “parking problem”. They’re usually right. But what is the nature of that problem? /3
Maybe 'cuz if it “eliminated a system in which forests’ worth of papers are pushed from one desk to the next, it would’ve ruined the cottage industry of connected permit expediters who...always manage to get their folders placed on the top of the pile”/3 missionlocal.org/2021/02/san-fr…
For centuries, Americans built compact, walkable, neighborhoods. They provide affordable shelter & let us meet many daily needs without getting in a car. They're a great American tradition
Today, we took a big step toward making that tradition legal again qz.com/2052284/califo…
Here’s a traditional fourplex at 203 Bryant St, #PaloAlto. It’s on a 5000 sf lot. That’s 35 homes per net residential acre. At that level of compactness, people walk a lot more & drive a lot less.
This is the kind of traditional American housing that #SB9 will make legal again.
As the @SierraClub’s John Holtzclaw explains, “This study suggests the following actions to reduce our dependence on the automobile, afford us more transportation options, reduce congestion buildup and reduce air pollution:…”
Imposing minimum parking mandates on commercial land uses near transit makes housing scarce and expensive.
If you have difficulty envisioning why, try adding homes near this #Milpitas light rail station. See all this underused asphalt? It’s all required by law.
Here's what a #Milpitas light right station area looks like on the ground.
To get here, take the #VTA light rail line to the Alder stop. Then, trudge north through a sea of parking.
#Milpitas could instead manage curb parking near the station, using prices and permits, and remove its costly minimum parking regulations. Many cities have already done this.
“As the leader of one of the state’s largest parking authorities, Park #NewHaven, I’ve come to learn a lot about parking. Our business model rests on the notion that parking is better when shared & the cost of parking should be borne by people who want to drive.”
A good policy.
“Zoning laws have the opposite result. They impose the cost of parking on nondrivers — and on all of us. Zoning mandates on parking make the cost of construction — and housing — more expensive."