In the short run, the market is a narrative machine, but in the long run, it is a narrative-debunking machine.
What else is a crash if not a price-based debunking of the prior narrative?
My observation is (obviously) based on Benjamin Graham's famous line:
“In the short run, the market is a voting machine but in the long run, it is a weighing machine.”
The reason I went with Narrative over voting is that the voting is the result of 1. the narrative, and 2. the virality of that Narrative.
What is the Bitcoin narrative?
It's that fiat currency has been debased by government + central bank interventions. (“Printers go brrrr.”) This will lead to a shift to digital currency.
Buy Bitcoin and drive Lambos, or stay with fiat currency and own worthless paper.
Or the Inflation narrative:
Combine ultra-low rates and a big stimulus with pent-up demand as the vaccines lead the post-pandemic economy to re-open. This story is the perfect formula for rising prices and higher inflation expectations!
Passive Indexing narative: Its hard to pick winning stocks! Its expensive to hire the people who might be able to pick winning stocks, too! And you don’t know who they are until its too late.
Why not instead just by a cheap index of the biggest stocks, or the entire market?
I am beginning to suspect EVERYTHING is Narrative
I can find a narrative for the Worker Shortage, why Valuation has underperformed, why Meme stocks got so hot, why Robinhood may not have staying power.
There are narratives and counter-narratives for almost any market, economic, or investing topic you can think of.
Voting versus Weighing
Trading versus Investing
Sentiment versus Intrinsic Worth
Short-term versus Long-Term
The “Narrative paradigm” is a communication theory conceptualized by Walter Fisher of USC. He observed that meaningful communication occurs via storytelling because “stories are more persuasive than logical arguments.”
1. Survivorship bias creates an unrealistic picture of the world, w/lots of easy winners in evidence. We construct a storyline based on this incomplete data set.
2. Hindsight bias makes us believe we knew things prior (when we did not)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
• 1992-2006, >75% of all day-traders quit w/i 2 years
• Negative Aggregate performance of all traders over 15-years.
• Only 1 out of 100 day traders earned profits over time
What's so pernicious from a trader's perspective is: YOU CAN MAKE MONEY DAY-TRADING!!! but the odds are you will give it back plus most of your starting capital. Greed only sees the all-caps teaser while ignoring the lower-case reality.
See this US example:
Individual investors pay a tremendous performance penalty for active trading. From 1991 to 1996, of 66,465 household with discount brokerage trading accounts, those trading the most earned 11.4%/year vs 17.9% for the market's returns
Shafiroff refined various phone-selling techniques (straight line, the first trade, the trust close). These were published for the 1st time in “Successful Telephone Selling in the ’80s” and subsequent editions (’90s, etc.)
Bull markets don't die of old age; they are murdered by errors. What kills them are the policy mistakes made by Central Bankers, elected officials + Politicians of all kinds.
One person's "taking away the punchbowl" is another person's murder weapon...
And a 30% pullback in individual names after a 50-100% run up feels like normal volatility to me...
"Second-level thinking is back. With the benefit of hindsight, investors should have been paying attention to the expectations that were baked into some of these stocks."
-Strengthens Biden stimulus proposals
-Embarrasses those yelling about inflation
-Big increase in wages = more hiring
-"All models are wrong, but some are useful"
-BLS models are especially noisy
-NFP = overrated economic indicator
-"Nobody know anything"
I would add that assembling this data during lockdown/pandemic is exceedingly difficult. Lots of variables errors introduced into April.
May/June/July reports now hold potential for huge upside surprise