Gross misinformation from 2 anti-vaping activists. No pro-vaping expert consulted to challenge or correct
No response to my letter to editor to fix it, so here are my corrections
Pls share
Thread...
1/ 'Switching has not been shown to reduce proven health harms’
Response
NASEM 18-2: 'There is substantial evidence that completely switching from ... cigarettes to #ecigs results in reduced short-term adverse health outcomes in several organ systems' nap.edu/24952
2/ ‘Long term use of vapes is not better for your health than smoking’
Response
UK Royal College of Physicians, the long-term risk of vaping is 'unlikely to exceed 5% of the harm from smoking tobacco' bit.ly/3iJzF9A
3/ ‘The impact on quitting smoking is very weak’
Response. A Cochrane review found that vaping is 70% more effective than NRT. This is consistent with results from observational studies, population studies and declines in smoking rates bit.ly/2TYbidI
4/ ‘They get hooked on nicotine and then they graduate from vaping to smoking’
Response
Nicotine dependence in never-smoking vapers is rare
Most users are already smokers
No evidence vaping causes youth who would not have smoked to take up smoking bit.ly/3grUkNy
The lack of balanced reporting in this article led to serious factual errors being disseminated. To the extent that smokers accept this misinformation, it will cost lives and is irresponsible. Please do better.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
-BT did not invent vaping
-Vapes are a direct competitor to cigarettes and are a huge disruptive threat to the industry
-BT is mostly focussed on #HTPs
-If BT switches from #cigs to #ecigs, that is good for public health. vaping is 95% safer
2. Popcorn lung has been long discredited
There has never been a single case of 'popcorn lung' from vaping or smoking, and diacetyl levels are hundreds of times higher in smoke than vapour
The addictiveness of nicotine depends on how it is delivered. Smoking is highly addictive due to rapid nicotine delivery and other chemicals in smoke. Vaping is significantly less addictive than smoking
3/ doctors should be focused on getting people off cigarettes and nicotine completely
Ideally yes. But many smokers can't quit nicotine and switching to a safer alternative is lifesaving. The focus of #THR is reducing disease, not ceasing nicotine
▪️Smoking is the largest risk factor for cancer
▪️Vaping is estimated to be <0.5% the cancer risk of smoking
▪️Most of the carcinogens in smoke are absent from vapour or in very small amounts
2/ "We don’t know what the long-term consequences are going to be”
It is beyond reasonable doubt that #vaping will be far less risky than smoking. @RCPLondon estimates that the long-term risk is likely to be no more than 5% of the risk of smoking
3/ “Very easy to get nicotine for #vaping from the doctor”
Actually no. The process is
▪️Complex & time-consuming for GPs
▪️Delayed by @TGAgovau approval
▪️Importing by a 3rd party
▪️Import permit needed
▪️Much more costly
It will be easier to go next door and buy a cigarette!
2/ "tobacco industry application to relax poison controls and greenlight the sale of novelty tobacco products being heavily promoted to young people in the US"
NO. This is for heated tobacco products NOT #vaping. #HTPs have been approved by the FDA.
Please learn the difference
3/ "unfounded claims about the benefits of #ecigs in smoking cessation"
NO. The evidence is very clear that vaping is more effective than other quitting aids and could significantly reduce Australia's smoking rate bit.ly/2Z6m804
2/5 'The 95% safer figure is a factoid based on opinion'
WRONG. This is based on comprehensive reviews by @RCPLondon and @PHE_uk. It is consistent with the substantial reduction in toxins, the reduced biomarkers and improved health in smokers who switch athra.org.au/blog/2019/12/2…
3/5 'Long-term risk. It took 40 years to find out the effects of smoking'
Science has come a long way since then. Smoke contains >7000 chemicals, vapour <300. Chemicals in vapour are mostly <1% concentration in smoke. @RCPLondon says the long-term risk is <5% risk of smoking.