“The Trump Organization is expected to be hit with criminal charges as soon as next week by Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance’s office in a case that Trump attorneys say is tied to tax-related conduct, multiple people familiar with the matter tell NBC”

nbcnews.com/politics/donal…
2. Ron Fischetti, an attorney for the Trumps “said company lawyers met with Vance’s office on Thursday and tried to persuade the Manhattan D.A.’s office not to go forward.”
3. “Manhattan district attorney’s office has informed Donald J. Trump’s lawyers that it is considering criminal charges against his family business”

“Vance Jr. could announce charges against the Trump Organization and the executive, Allen H. Weisselberg”
nytimes.com/2021/06/25/nyr…
4. The big implication:

“The indictments could increase pressure to cooperate on Mr. Weisselberg, who could seek to cut a deal with prosecutors to testify against Mr. Trump in exchange for leniency.”

via NYTimes’ @WRashbaum Ben Protess and @Jonesieman

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ryan Goodman

Ryan Goodman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rgoodlaw

28 Jun
Questions to ask @DeptofDefense about U.S. strike on "Iran-backed militia groups in the Iraq-Syria border region."

Question 1: What can you say to assure Congress and the American people this will deter (rather than continue/escalate the cycle of violence).👇

#Iran #Iraq
Question 2: Why does the DoD/USG think this strike will deter, when the February strike didn't?

Question 3: Does DoD/USG acknowledge the February strike did not deter?

Good background reading (by @Mikeknightsiraq and Crispin Smith from May 2021).👇

washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysi…
Question 4: The Feb. 25 U.S. strike was only in Syria. Did Iraq consent to June 27 U.S. strike on its territory?

Question 5: If Iraq did not consent, what's the international legal justification, and will the US submit a letter to United Nations (under article 51 of UN Charter)? Image
Read 14 tweets
24 Jun
Giuliani's "misconduct directly inflamed tensions that bubbled over into the events of January 6"

He "communicated demonstrably false and misleading statements to courts, lawmakers and the public at large in his capacity as lawyer for" Mr. Trump and the Trump Campaign.
2. "One only has to look at the ongoing present public discord…which erupted into violence, insurrection and death on January 6, 2021 at the U.S. Capitol, to understand the extent of the damage that can be done when the public is misled by false information about the elections."
3. Mr. Giuliani is:

"suspended from the practice of law in the State of New York, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court" and "until such time as disciplinary matters pending before the Committee have been concluded."

nycourts.gov/courts/ad1/cal…
Read 4 tweets
21 Jun
This has to be one of most effective analytic takedowns of another side's argument.

Jeh Johnson wrote a deeply flawed piece opposing @SenGillibrand @SenJoniErnst's legislation on #SexualAssault in military.

This by @rachelv12 is a master class.👇

justsecurity.org/77025/professi…
2. One example

Johnson rhetorically claims: "A military commander must have legal authority over those in a unit...The two must be inseparable."

VanLandingham with the facts: "Demonstrably false given the thousands of U.S. military commanders" without any such legal authority.
3. "Mr. Johnson...warns that Congress shouldn’t fix what isn’t broken, and should leave everything but sexual assault crimes alone.

Fact: Court-martialing Black service members at a rate twice that of their white counterparts is a broken system in need of repair. Period."
Read 5 tweets
17 Jun
<thread>

In @PostOpinions, former FBI General Counsel @AWeissmann_ and I assess FBI Director Wray's two days of testimony on #Jan6.

First, Wray failed to explain FBI policy on social media monitoring that may be "galling to lawmakers" when they find out.
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
2. Watch👇

@AOC: Does FBI monitor social media to combat violent extremism (such as threats to Capitol on social media pre-#Jan6)

Wray: DOJ policy prevents FBI without "proper predication"

DOJ policy: Can monitor social media WITHOUT predication for special events (like Jan 6)
3. Watch👇

@RepSwalwell: Does FBI have authority to monitor open source websites/social media where groups post about threats?

Wray: Att'y General Guidelines prevent FBI without "proper predication"

A.G. Guidelines: Can monitor WITHOUT predication for special events (eg #Jan6)
Read 10 tweets
15 Jun
One implication of emails showing how Trump-Meadows tried to overturn the election via outrageous, illegitimate pressure on Justice Department:

Sure seems to strengthen the case for the ongoing criminal investigation in Georgia, led by @FaniWillisForDA.

justsecurity.org/75032/litigati…
2. "Much of the correspondence also occurred during a tense week…when Mr Rosen and his top deputies realized that one of their peers had plotted with Mr Trump to first oust Mr Rosen and then to try to use federal law enforcement to force Georgia to overturn its election..."

NYT
3 With the Georgia criminal investigation note:

House Oversight Committee also requests transcribed interview with former US Attorney for Northern District of Goergia Byung Jin Pak who, the Committee notes, resigned on Jan 3 "reportedly under pressure from the Trump White House"
Read 5 tweets
11 Jun
Say what?

“I never discussed the leak cases with Trump. He didn’t really ask me any of the specifics.”

former Attorney General Bill Barr to Politico

So it was just generalities, then?

@dlippman @AndrewDesiderio @woodruffbets report

politico.com/news/2021/06/1…
2. Trying to make sense of this line given NYT's detailed reporting👇

Sounds like Barr may just be denying the records were sought under his watch.

And that Barr is not denying his knowledge the records had been sought under Sessions (and that Barr's DOJ maintained gag order).
3. Also looking back at the Times report and Barr's statements to Politico.

Barr doesn't deny he oversaw investigations of the members of Congress, and indeed revivified them.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(