"…the "Jewish intellect" appears to be centered on..."/1
"...An ability to manipulate and integrate chains of reasoning, especially those related to "causality", coupled with faculty otherwise known as verbal and/or symbolic analytics to interrelate and explain derived meanings. An ability to..."/2
"...integrate emotional context with such analytical frameworks as the skill needed to attain proficiency in conduction and playing classical music, acting, selling, and practicing psychotherapy."/3
"It would be inappropriate to conclude that a single generation of exposure to such an environment [Jewish home] is sufficient to produce the extent of giftedness displayed among the “people of the Book”, just as..."/4
"...it would be wrong to conclude that one or two generations of rearing in an environment lacking in these “enrichments will cause the complete disappearance of this giftedness."/5
"Jewish people…excel in some cognitive domains – for example, verbal and numerical ability – but not in others, as witness their unexceptional performance on certain types of spatial or perceptual problems (where their scores sometimes average slightly below the test norms)."/6
"As a consequence, the scores of Jewish subjects on tests that have high verbal, numerical, and conceptual factor loadings (such as the Stanford-Binet) will usually exceed their scores on tests that have a greater or exclusive emphasis on nonverbal and/or perceptual skills."/7
"Among the fields in which Jews represent a relatively insignifican proportion of historically great people are painting, architecture, and the more observational sciences...such fields as earth science, botany, zoology...fall behind that of non-Jewish whites."/9
"...perform well in areas that depend (1) on the ability to comprehend and skillfull manipulate long chains of verbally coded reasoning and/or (2) on the ability to integrate emotional or other behaviorally coded information into a temporally coded, meaning-oriented framework"/10
"...perform less well in areas where the visuospatial and emotional perceptions of the brain's right hemisphere are directly available to the "mind's eye" and are integrated into a pictorial or structural framework."/11
An exceptional number of Jews score at or near genius level on the Stanford-Binet [intelligence test].
24 of 28 (86 %) of children in New York City w/ IQ scores of 170 or higher (every public school student was given the paper & pencil test) were Jewish./12
"Several considerations work against the conclusion that a single generation of exposure to such an environment [Jewish home] could have enabled children to attain these heightened abilities. These include..."/13
"...(1) the large percentage of Jewish people that test at a genius or near-genius level and the exceedingly small proportion scoring below the norm, both of which suggest that the entire IQ distribution has risen [web.mit.edu/fustflum/docum…] & [cremieux.medium.com/the-jewish-adv…];..."/14
"...(2) the early age at which high IQ scores are routinely displayed; (3) the marvelous accomplishments of the Jewish people [extravagantly disproportionately by *Ashkenazim*, genetically distinct Jewish diasphora population]..."/15
"..., which amply demonstrate that the forms that the Jewish intellect has taken are exceedingly favorable for meaningful achievements; and (4)...evidence that this heightened ability neither develops nor dissipates in a single generation."/16
Some of the lines of evidence for the conclusion that the *Ashkenazi* Jewish IQ advantage (and *distinct* IQ profile) are genetic in origin (and caused by evolutionary selection over at most ~1000 years: pastebin.com/6GVeUj1k] /17
In a nutshell, the level of disproportionate success of Ashkenazi Jews can be predicted from, is mainly explained by, and is well in line with the known causality between IQ and positive outcomes within and between groups.
P.P.S. I forgot to add the heading:
'SOME EVIDENCE FOR ***ASHKENAZI*** JEWISH INTELLIGENCE/IQ ADVANTAGE = ~FULLY GENETIC IN ORIGIN (& the major cause of their extravagant overrepresentation in intellectual achievements rewarding high g factor of intelligence & verbal IQ)'
Related outcome stat, with a fascinating compatibility (genius IQ <-> Nobel):
Arthur R. Jensen on Eysenck (hanseysenck.com by @KirkegaardEmil):
“Eysenck was a kind of genius...or at least a person of very unusual talents, and the only person of that unusual caliber that I have come across in the field of psychology."
"Still, Prof. Jensen did not abandon his conventional beliefs in the power of environment to raise or lower intelligence, and went on to publish 30 papers and build a non-controversial reputation before he finally concluded that Eysenck and Burt were right."
"In 1969 he shocked the country with his famous Harvard Educational Review article, “How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement?” This 123-page paper, which demolished the view that proper instruction could raise children’s IQs, may have been the most sensational..."
"That their [fraternal twins who grew up together] IQ scores...differ significantly more than those of identical twins who didn’t even grow up in the same family suggests that heredity is more important than environment in determining IQ."
"studies have shown that the IQs of adopted children are closer to those of their biological parents than to those of their foster parents...in a family whose children are all adopted, there will be a greater variation in IQ than in a family whose children are all biological."
"Test data show that for every social and economic class, if a son has a higher IQ than his father he is likely to move up and if his IQ is lower he is likely to move down. IQ thus appears to affect social class more than the reverse."
It's remarkable that compared to #NYTimes who reads like a notebook of evolution denier Lysenko, Stalin's favored "scientist", #AmericanReneissance reads like a peer reviewed science journal as for content, arguments, & accuracy in #HBD (human biodiversity) related content (!).
Having read tens of AmRen articles, I've not discovered pure racisim. It's been scientifically informed, utilitarian & logical albeit at times blunt population level analysis & worry about the West's outgroup favoritism - not discrimination against any given individual.
I'm finding their human biodiversity articles - many written by true giants in the fields of relevant sciences - and book reviews very high quality. They DO NOT DISTORT UNDERLYING SCIENCE. That's most important, regardless of their ideas of what to do based on those common facts.
"deaf children get low scores on verbal intelligence tests. However, they get normal scores on non-verbal tests and by the time they are adults they have overcome most of the verbal deficit."
"children with catastrophic motor disabilities, who lead lives that are severely restricted by any definition, apparently have higher tested intelligence levels than blacks who are not physically handicapped."
"Perhaps the greatest direct assault on the environmentalist view comes from biology and physiology. As early as the 1960s, it was discovered that many mental illnesses are best treated with drugs. This instantly invalidated convoluted psychoanalytic theories about the..."
"But can that African 70 average IQ be real? It is indeed extremely low, the lowest found in any comparable area. This has caused many to dismiss the finding.
I know that the figure is not a fluke, however, because for the last six years I have..."
"...collected African IQ data on hundreds of students at the prestigious University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa. The average IQ for these African students turns out to be 84. Assuming they score 15 points above the general average, as university students.."
"...of any group typically do, then an average African IQ of 70 is implied—exactly what the direct measurements show."
"An IQ of 70 suggests mental retardation—at least it would in the White populations of Europe, North America, Australia and New Zealand. There it would..."
Amazon has removed this interesting book as part of their social "justice" campaign so I'll be quoting it here.
"Fuerle’s Erectus Walks Among Us is another example of race-realist scholarship that could not have found a place in today’s mainstream."
"Erectus Walks Among Us is several books in one, all written from a firmly race-realist perspective. It is a primer on evolution and genetics, a catalog of how populations differ, an introduction to sociobiology and the concept of genetic interests, and a plea for white survival"
"Mr. Fuerle is not a paleoanthropologist — he is a polymath with degrees in math, law, economics, physics and chemistry — but this may be an advantage. He does not share the anti-racist prejudices so common among social scientists, and he has written a clear and engaging book..."