The “3rd wave” of C19 was LESS DEADLY than the “2nd wave”..
In-hospital fatality rates for Toronto patients:
2nd wave: 27%
3rd wave: 14%
The 3rd wave produced ~the same # of hospitalizations as the 2nd wave (~4,000), but just ~HALF the deaths (602 vs 1,054)
2/
The stark wave-to-wave in-hospital fatality rate differences is most pronounced when assessing only NON-INTUBATED patients (90% of all hospitalizations, ICU+ward):
2nd wave: 23%
3rd wave: 11%
(less than HALF!)
3/
Looking at the data another way, for NON-INTUBATED patients, the daily # of admissions in the 3rd wave was 55% HIGHER than the 2nd wave, yet the daily fatalities was 28% LOWER… (see bottom two charts)
4/
So, to be crystal clear:
In Toronto, if you entered the hospital with/for C-19 in the 3rd wave, your chances of surviving and leaving the hospital were…
~DOUBLE
…vs. the 2nd wave.
5/
Side note: peculiarly, despite the stark differences in NON-INTUBATED patient fatality rates, there was MINIMAL DIFFERENCE in the in-hospital fatality rate for INTUBATED patients in the 3rd wave vs. the 2nd wave..
2nd wave: 56%
3rd wave: 50%
6/
In any case, 90% of hospitalized C19 cases among Toronto patients were NON-INTUBATED (roughly the same ratio as the 2nd wave), and in the 3rd wave their survival rate was DOUBLE vs. 2nd wave.
7/
This data appears to be inconsistent with the below table from the Ontario Science Table (@COVIDSciOntario), presented on April 1st, 2021, indicating the 3rd wave variants were more deadly…?
8/
The above empirical data also seems to contradict the fear narrative around the UK variant-driven 3rd wave…
9/
Could the # of hospitalizations in the 3rd wv have been inflated by increased surveillance testing for SARS-CoV-2 among all hospitalized patients? @anthonyfurey writes that just 36% of kids admitted with C19 were there FOR C19. What about other ages?
This past weekend, @DonaldWelsh16 was targeted by his local community newspaper for expressing on Twitter his anxieties about the actions and tendencies of our public health advisors. Donald is a concerned citizen, and was undeserving of a smear. 🧵 lfpress.com/news/local-new…
The newspaper zeroed in on Donald recalling the early origins of the holocaust. That is of course a sensitive point of comparison (extremely mildly put) and he has since apologized and deleted the tweets in question. Here is his follow-up thread:
Apart from this parallel, the @LFPRess appears to have had no interest Donald’s message. Donald is, quite simply, a concerned citizen (& experienced scientist), who like so many see a devolution & regression in public health’s abandonment of western procedures for something else.
There appears wide divergence in ICU admits between (i) PubHealth Ontario’s Case & Contact Management (CCM) database and (ii) the CCSO data. (The Toronto data cited above is from the CCM).
Ontario Science Table lockdown policy, backed by @fordnation, @JohnTory & @epdevilla, appears to have dramatically shifted C-19 disease burden onto the low income, high visible minority, high household density, high service worker areas of Toronto.
Shocking #’s & visuals follow.
First, a message to vulnerable communities:
In my opinion, health/govt officials put you in harms way. They⬆️your mobility *relative to the population*, shifting community disease burden onto you. They did not care about you. They cared about themselves and their failed policy.
We know there were relative disease burden differences. But to what degree?