@RealWillyBot@jimcramer While its great to see #MSM's epiphany (albeit 3 years late) that #tether might be #dodgy. perplexing that #tether is still being discussed as if its a potential risk vs a flat out fraud. Not only is it obvious that tether are NOT the 7th largest holder of commercial paper.
@RealWillyBot@jimcramer While commercial paper is s Trillion$ market its long been in decline, average term is 270 days and almost always rolled over (and if its not most likely refinanced for cheaper longer term debt - hence the decline)
@RealWillyBot@jimcramer So lets assume $1T market is declining 10%pa, 270 day term, 90% rolled over. max deals that could be financed by new entrant ~$7.5B pm....($90B pa).
@RealWillyBot@jimcramer The commercial paper market would have been beseeched by #tether bankers chasing deals like a battalion of rabid #pacman eating commercial paper and everyone in their path.
@RealWillyBot@jimcramer Before the carneverous tether pacman could have even begun terrorising the commercial paper market #tether would have already have achieved the impossible the streamlined coordination and redirection of billions and billions of incoming fiat.
@RealWillyBot@jimcramer Lets not forget these muppets were unable to put in place an actual contract with CCC who towelled them up for $850m....
@RealWillyBot@jimcramer putting all that aside. The number one reason why #tether are not 7th, 10th or even 50th ranked commercial paper funder is well because they never had the funding in the first place.
@RealWillyBot@jimcramer Its amazing how perfect a fit the quantum of commercial paper issued matches the shortfall of cash and the other rubbish on their balance sheet.
@RealWillyBot@jimcramer Speaking of the other rubbish on the balance-sheet.....those reverse repo notes....I'm betting are nothing more than another layer of paper so they could pilfer even more of their anaemic cash holdings (repo the CP for cash)
The tax framework I had assumed would be applicable was/is pretty well as I expected. Most of which I've learnt over the years the hard way by getting shit wrong (don't get me started on the pain of get pegged in the bum by the tax-office for failing rollover relief tests).
Paying the tax piper..Income tax or Capital Gains. What's not well understood by the swinging dick muppet brigade is referals fee's, staking, mining, shilling and lending ..... that's ALL income tax. You might think it all pools into one big HODL fantasy. but it don't.
I came across these thieves while looking at $isx customer Insightgroup OU. #isignthis was (I guess still is) seeking $1.6m damages from @ASX why? apparently #insightgroup was so infuriated by the "false" #ASX claims against #isignthis it terminated its services. @FinTelegram
@newmoneyreview Well this is the next thing to look at....who actually paid for and were issued CEL tokens at 30c ....ftx and bitfinex I'm guessing between the three and their perifeey they would control literally the whole market...it trade a like a non bouncing dead cat.
@newmoneyreview CEL tokens issued 30cents went 10x by Q3-2020...Dec 2020 the last month of the financial period the price went vertical closing year out at $5.45. adding $2B to Celsius balance sheet....ironically rather than be penalised for issuing far more than market demand
@newmoneyreview they instead gorged their own balance sheet by holding in treasury. How anemic would this balance sheet be if the treasury shares were booked at cost (zero) or issue price (30cents).
So the second you transfer any digital asset into a #celsius account beneficial ownership changes. Its no longer your asset.
This means your ability to manage risk becomes binary - either the assets are with Celsius or not with Celsius.
So what? As long as they pay out best in market returns why would you care? 1) Risk vs return. Bitcoin or bottletops, Buffett or Saylor- it doesn't matter who or what you can't disconnect risk from return.
Today I wasted too much time trying to reconcile some fairly basic numbers for #celsius which was a bit frustrating and I was scratching around trying to work out where I'd gone wrong.
So I'll throw it out to twitter ..... Someone tell which one of these numbers on celcius.network/cel-token-expl… page is actually correct?
Ok its a bit of a trick question....As literally all of them are incorrect in one form or another.