Grateful for advice from #Hebrew and #Linguistics folk.

The Biblical name Naarah (נַעֲרָה) can be translated as ‘girl’.

A bit non-descript perhaps, but then some names are.

Clines, however, reads נַעֲרוֹתֶֽיךָ in Job 41.5 as ‘your sparrows’, which strikes me as plausible. Image
It also finds confirmation in a few apparent cognates from other languages, e.g.,

Mehri «nəγγōr» = ‘stork’,

Akkadian «nēru» = ‘a type of bird’ (from a lexical list), and

Arabic «nuγarat-» = ‘a red-billed sparrow’.
The question:

How much can be inferred about the base form of נַעֲרוֹתֶֽיךָ on the basis of the information above?

And what if anything does that tell me about the likelihood that the name נַעֲרָה is related to a ‘sparrow’ word?
P.S. Clines gives as possible base forms *נַעֲרָה and *נֹעָרָה.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James Bejon

James Bejon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JamesBejon

27 Jun
THREAD: John’s #Passion #Narrative

SUB-TITLE: The Fall in Reverse

A garden, a tree, some thorns, some guards, angels, weapons, and flames.

What passage of Scripture do these things bring to mind? Genesis 2–3, right?

It’s *a* valid answer. But it’s not the only one.
John’s passion narrative involves all of these things,

and its use of them is highly instructive, as we’ll see below.
Like all masterpieces, John’s passion narrative works at multiple levels.

For a start, it can be read it as a historical narrative and subjected to critical scrutiny.

And, when that’s done, it fares pretty well.
Read 54 tweets
9 Jun
THREAD: Fun with Genealogies.

Soon after the Israelites’ conquest of the trans-Jordan, the Machirites (descendants of Manasseh) came to Moses in order to raise the issue of Zelophehad’s inheritance.
Zelophehad had only fathered daughters.

Hence, if his daughters married Israelites from a different tribe, the Machirites would lose a sizeable chunk of their land-inheritance.
At first blush, the Machirites’ concern seems reasonable enough.

But it also raises a question.
Read 17 tweets
25 May
THREAD: The Book of Judges & its Anti-Feasts

SUBTITLE: A Liturgy of Violence
The book of Judges is a book of deliverance.

That might make it sound like a fairly upbeat story.

Sadly, however, it’s anything but.

As the book unfolds, its acts of deliverance become progressively more bloody and paradoxical, as do its deliverers,...
...until, in the book’s awful finale, deliverance doesn’t come at all.

A helpless woman is delivered over to her enemies.

These acts of deliverance—or, in the last case, non-deliverance—are portrayed as inversions/antitheses of Israel’s major feasts.
Read 52 tweets
14 May
THREAD: Jesus is King!

#David, #Nebuchadnezzar, #Doves, and the #Messiah.

Matthew opens his Gospel with a statement of Jesus’ right to occupy David’s throne.

Mark and Luke do too, but they do things their own way,

and reveal a lot about kingship in the process.
Kings were always part of God’s plan.

Back in Genesis 17, Abraham was told kings would come forth from his loins.

And they soon did.
From Israel’s perspective, however, kings were a two-edged sword.

They could bring about the best of times and the worst of times.
Read 20 tweets
3 May
THREAD: Belshazzar’s Riddle.

SUB-TITLE: When I consider the work of your hands...

#Babylon, #Numerology, #MedoPersia, #Stargazers: what’s not to like?

Later, a substack link. As a taster, however, let me (try to!) intrigue you with some data.
The text of Daniel 5 is patterned around a whole array of threefold groups and structures.

It consists of three paragraphs and thirty verses.
It contains three notable triplets, namely:

✅ Daniel’s trio of attributes (‘light, insight, and wisdom’),

✅ Daniel’s threefold ability (‘the ability to interpret dreams, explain riddles, and solve problems’), and
Read 28 tweets
18 Apr
THREAD: We three kings of Israel aren’t.

SUB-TITLE: A method to Matthew’s apparent madness.

As is well known, Matthew’s genealogy (in Matt. 1.1-17) consists of three groups of fourteen generations.

P.S. Substack version available at the end.
As is well known, Matthew’s genealogy (in Matt. 1.1–17) consists of three groups of fourteen generations.

Between Abraham and Israel’s first great king (David) we have fourteen generations;

between David and Israel’s great disaster (the exile) we have a further fourteen;
and between the exile and Israel’s great deliverer (the Messiah) we have our final fourteen.

Every fourteen generations, an event of epochal significance takes place, which makes Jesus’ arrival right on cue.

‘It’s almost as if God planned it’, Bart Ehrman says.
Read 36 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(