#SupremeCourt to hear a PIL today stating online system of education is set on standards that make it out of reach of students with disabilities, leading to their exclusion in the field of education
#DisabilityRights #OnlineClasses
The petition states Section 16 and 17 of the Right of Persons with Disability Act, 2016 require governments to ensure and take specific measures to promote and facilitate inclusive education
#supremecourt #DisabilityRights
issues flagged:

(a) Lectures do not have transcripts and there are no sign language interpreters

(b)The study materials provided are inaccessible because some contents are in image form and no alternative texts are provided for the description of the images
Issues flagged:

(c) The scanned documents are not properly scanned or not converted via OCR reader

#supremecourt #DisabilityRights
Hearing begins.

Adv. Sanchita Ain says this relates to denial of access to students with disabilities due to online education.
We appreciate the cause but your petition says you have not approached any authorities: Court

Ain says they have.

But your petition says otherwise: Court
Ain says that might be inadvertent mistake.

Court says amend the petition.

Place on record all applications to govt authorities and their response if any, court says.
Adv. Sanchita Ain agrees to the same. Matter to be heard after one week.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar & Bench

Bar & Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

6 Jul
Farewell ceremony for Delhi High Court judge, Justice JR Midha, on the occasion of his retirement to begin shortly.

#DelhiHighCourt Image
Before the ceremony begins, a two-minute silence is observed for Judicial officers, judges, lawyers who have succumbed to COVID-19.

#DelhiHighCourt
We are here to bid farewell to one of the most humanitarian judges who did not let go of any opportunity to extend help, one of the most humane judges, Advocate Abhijat says.

#DelhiHighCourt
Read 81 tweets
6 Jul
Karnataka High Court to hear plea by Twitter's Manish Maheshwari challenging notice issued to him by Uttar Pradesh Police under Section 41A CrPC over tweets on Ghaziabad assault video

#KarnatakaHighCourt #TwitterIndia @manishm Image
Hearing begins. Senior Advocate CV Nagesh appears for Maheshwari. Court wants to hear respondents on issue of maintainability first

#KarnatakaHighCourt #TwitterIndia
Counsel for UP Police making submissions. Nagesh says that he cannot hear arguments, as the lawyer is arguing physically before the Bench

#KarnatakaHighCourt #TwitterIndia
Read 57 tweets
6 Jul
#SupremeCourt hears plea seeking to consider goods and services at par.

Adv: raises a point which will benefit lakhs and lakhs of consumers

Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul: High Court can examine it in detail

Adv: HC does not have the power to issue directions under Article 142 Image
Justice Hemant Gupta: how can the service provided by a doctor be equated with that of a good?

Advocate Hemant Gupta: The court has held it in a number of judgments. Legislature in 1986 services were given greater scope and goods were given lesser
Adv Gupta: The horizon of services was expanded by an amendment. There was a further amendment brought them at par

Justice Kaul: what are you challenging?

Adv Gupta: from 2003 goods and services are at par. but because of typographical error it is not at par

#supremecourt
Read 7 tweets
6 Jul
Delhi High Court to hear plea seeking directions to Twitter to appoint a Resident Grievance Officer as mandated under Rule 4 of the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021

#delhihighcourt #itrules2021 #TwitterIndia Image
Hearing begins. Senior Advocate Sajan Poovayya appears for Twitter India.

#delhihighcourt #itrules2021 #TwitterIndia
Court points out that only interim Grievance Officer was appointed by Twitter. It is not fair, Mr Poovayya. When a Senior Counsel makes a statement, I take it seriously: Justice Rekha Palli

#delhihighcourt #itrules2021 #TwitterIndia
Read 9 tweets
6 Jul
Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) shortly to hear a plea for quashing of FIR by UP police against Gareeb Nawaz Masjid Committee Secretary in relation to report by the @thewire_in on Masjid demolition.

#GareebNawaz Image
A Division bench of A Division Bench of Justices Ramesh Singh and Narendra Kumar Johari, is hearing the matter.

#GareebNawaz #UttarPradesh @thewire_in Image
Advocate Tripathi: This a case, where my clients gave an interview to a news portal, @thewire_in and FIR was registered against them. It is submitted that all the charges under 153A and other connected charges are unsustainable.

#GareebNawaz #UttarPradesh @Uppolice
Read 15 tweets
6 Jul
#BombayHighCourt to hear application filed by #ElgarParishad accused Sudha Bharadwaj seeking default bail.

Hearing before Justices SS Shinde and NJ Jamadar.

#ElgarParishadcase Image
The Court had sought responses from the National investigation Agency (NIA) and the State of Maharashtra.

barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Read 77 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(