By 1944 a standard German infantry division had about 4.000 horses. Yes, you read that correctly: 4.000
#WW2 #SWW #History Image
The number of horses for the artillery as show here is actually too low because it included some batteries with just 3 guns, instead of the actual 4 Image
For Normandy such 'standard' divisions included the 271ID, 272ID, 275ID, 276ID, 277ID, 331ID, 352ID, 353ID, 363ID. Of course these were not identical in strength for various reasons
But to come back to an earlier moment, in mid 1943 the German Army (Heer) had a personnel strength of 4,29 million men. Transportation included 1,2 mil. horses and 230.000 motor vehicles. Numbers were a bit different for the navy and Luftwaffe though Image
Having horses to replace motor vehicles also puts a strain on manpower. To move 3 tons with a truck for 80km you only need 2 men, to accomplish the same with horses you need 24 men Image
Of course horses come in many different sizes and shapes. That's why the German military distinguished riding horses, light, heavy and super heavy draught horses in its TO/Es. In addition they used small and tough 'Panjepferden' from eastern Europe Image
If you like to see more of these threads, feel free to support me on ko-fi.com/niels_1944
Since people have already brought up bicycles and motorization, here are the numbers for those aspects and some other topics as well. (Again this is the standard authorized strength for a Type 44 division) Image
and especially for @militaryhistori, a Heeresgruppe B document with some of the number he used in S&S. It shows the numbers of both human and equine 'personnel'. Of interest are the horses with the navy, Luftwaffe and SS/Police in the Netherlands Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Niels Henkemans

Niels Henkemans Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Niels_1944

18 Aug
Thread: German orbats #2
Let’s continue our crash course of German OOBs. We’ll zoom in on this one Image
Anyway, time to dig little deeper and start with a inf rgt:
Staff, HQ company, three battalions and two regimental heavy weapons units Image
Read 24 tweets
17 Aug
Thread: German orbats
German document can be very interesting, even if you don’t speak German.

Their visual OOBs are prob the best example of that, if you know what the symbols mean.
Yes, you can look those up online, but how about a crash course in several threads? ImageImage
Modern publications typically use NATO symbols. Useful, but also boring.
(Examples from Zetterling’s ‘Normandy 1944’ and Zaloga’s ‘Cherbourg 1944’) ImageImage
German OOB charts are great, and a little confusing
Regard them as a unit assembled on an inspection ground: that they're seen from the perspective of a commander looking at his troops. So left on paper is actually right and right is left: So 4-3-2-1. Applies to all subunits! Image
Read 13 tweets
27 Jul
Thread: German 'stomach' and 'ear' units

Let's continue examining Cross-Channel Attack's (CCA) take on the German troops. For 1950/1951 it was admirable, but as we have seen yesterday not all of it holds up. Image
Now look at this sentence. The German use of stomach units has become (in)famous, but CCA correctly states that was just one division: the 70ID Image
The existence of ear and stomach units is a popular story, but it is seldom explored for what it really was.
On D-Day the 70ID did not really exist yet...
In the bigger picture it was very much an emergency formation in the summer (crisis) of 1944.
Read 11 tweets
26 Jul
Thread: German static divisions in Normandy supposedly had very poor personnel. While true to some extend but as always it's a bit more complicated. Cross-Channel Attack (1951) made a serious attempt for a balanced view. Arguably better than much what has been written since! Image
The book seems to be key in spreading the message that 'the average age of the 709ID was 36'. This is commonly presented as fact when in fact it was based on anecdotal evidence: An officer explaining the failure of his division.
His claim made it into German records as well 🙄 Image
Fact: the maximum average age of the combat elements in static divisions was set at 36.
And yes, support elements could raise that to over 36. But that’s just theory…
Are there reasons to believe that actually happened in the 709ID? Not really. 🧐
Read 21 tweets
2 Jul
Thread:
On 21 June 7.Armee was still responsible for the fighting in Normandy with a considerable force under its command Image
Its forces were still growing in number. Image
But with an increase in troops, so increased the supply issues. Supply could not keep up with the demands of rations, fuel and ammunition.
Read 8 tweets
3 Mar
There seem to be two options in talks about German MGs on the D-Day beaches:
1) All guns MG42s (especially at Omaha)
2) Just old and captured MGs
Neither are true. Let’s take a quick look at the available numbers for the 716ID and 352ID. [I’ll ignore the Osttruppen for now]
The 716ID was a static division, so poorly equipped with just old and captured MGs. Right? Not quite.
So why the confusion? For one people confuse organic and static weapons. Big no no.
On 1 Dec. 43 the division itself had:
349 x MG34
3 x 08/15
11 x 116(f)
13 x 08
It received 9 MG42 before D-Day.
You can expect the MG34 and MG42s in frontline units.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(