Anyway, time to dig little deeper and start with a inf rgt:
Staff, HQ company, three battalions and two regimental heavy weapons units
Regimental staff (flag) and the HQ Co. The square with the thick left side is the universal company symbol. If no mobility symbol is shown it means that a unit relies on foot/horse transportation
The company includes fltr: signal platoon, engineer platoon and bicycle platoon
This is a battalion. Flag representing the staff and – note the thick bar on the left – four companies
The regimental heavy weapons units include an infantry-gun unit (platoon) and anti-tank gun company (note the thick bar).
Need a trick to remember this?
T = (anti)tank
I = infantry (gun)
so what do the symbols mean? First of all these are late war (1943+) symbols, which are easier to understand than early war symbols. We’ll talk about those another time
We have a MG and a mortar symbol
Here all 4 infantry companies are identically equipped: 12 light MGs and 3 medium mortars.
How do we know the MGs are light? Because that’s the default. How do know the mortars are medium (8cm)? Because of the ‘m’ (mittler = medium)
See the pattern?
Number below a weapons symbol = number of weapons
Number left(ish) of the symbol = caliber
BTW, also note there are 3 LMG in the engineer platoon
So what about this one:
0+2 = 0 heavy, 2 light infantry guns. Why not 0+0+2? Because IGs were either heavy or light
(BTW, if this was a company, it would be 13.Kp. but this is only a platoon)
Which also explains why the AT-company (14.Kp.) does have 0+3+9. AT-guns came in heavy, medium and light. In this case 3 medium, 9 light.
And don’t forget: there also are 6 LMGs
Now let’s step away from the 319ID and look at a standard inf div in 1944 (= Grundgliederung)
As you can see there are only two battalions here. Staffs do have a LMG though.
BTW: even with only two battalions, the heavy weapons companies are still numbered 13. and 14.
The HQ company has two options: either a mounted platoon (square with diagonal line) or a bicycle platoon. Both with 3 LMGs though. Engineer platoon has 6 LMG
The battalions have three rifle companies (1-3) and a heavy-company (4), a.k.a. mg-company
The rifle companies all have 2 heavy and 13 light machine guns. As with infantry-guns, MG were either heavy or light
The heavy company has 6 HMG and 3 LMG. It also has heavy (4) and medium (6) but no light mortars.
Ignore the o). Like the x) in the HQ Co. it is used to indicate an alternative (6 mediums instead of 4 heavies)
The ‘Inf Div 44’ also included an independent Füselier battalion. Pretty much identical to a regular inf bn but the first company was equipped with bicycles. We have seen that symbol before in the HQ Co.
The IGs form a company (13.Kp.) with 2 heavy and 6 light IGs and 5 LMG. Note the heavy bar, identifying this as a company
The 14.Kp. is now more interesting than the previous example
fltr:
3 LMG and 3 motorized heavy AT-guns
-Why heavy? Because of the ‘s’ (schwer)
-Why motorized? Because of the symbol with the two wheels above it, which means they are moved by motor vehicles (not self-propelled!)
2 LMG and 36 ‘Panzerschreck’
1 LMG
You may have realized that the company symbols tell us very little about their internal organization. Only when subunits are added some things become clear. See the HQ company
To determine the exact internal organization you need to look at the TO/Es, or Kriegsstärkenachweisung (KStN). These lovely charts simply do not provide such details.
I’ll talk about KStNs another time. Next up is the artillery.
If you enjoyed this thread and would like to support me, you can get me Ko-Fi ko-fi.com/niels_1944
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thread: German orbats
German document can be very interesting, even if you don’t speak German.
Their visual OOBs are prob the best example of that, if you know what the symbols mean.
Yes, you can look those up online, but how about a crash course in several threads?
Modern publications typically use NATO symbols. Useful, but also boring.
(Examples from Zetterling’s ‘Normandy 1944’ and Zaloga’s ‘Cherbourg 1944’)
German OOB charts are great, and a little confusing
Regard them as a unit assembled on an inspection ground: that they're seen from the perspective of a commander looking at his troops. So left on paper is actually right and right is left: So 4-3-2-1. Applies to all subunits!
Let's continue examining Cross-Channel Attack's (CCA) take on the German troops. For 1950/1951 it was admirable, but as we have seen yesterday not all of it holds up.
Now look at this sentence. The German use of stomach units has become (in)famous, but CCA correctly states that was just one division: the 70ID
The existence of ear and stomach units is a popular story, but it is seldom explored for what it really was.
On D-Day the 70ID did not really exist yet...
In the bigger picture it was very much an emergency formation in the summer (crisis) of 1944.
Thread: German static divisions in Normandy supposedly had very poor personnel. While true to some extend but as always it's a bit more complicated. Cross-Channel Attack (1951) made a serious attempt for a balanced view. Arguably better than much what has been written since!
The book seems to be key in spreading the message that 'the average age of the 709ID was 36'. This is commonly presented as fact when in fact it was based on anecdotal evidence: An officer explaining the failure of his division.
His claim made it into German records as well 🙄
Fact: the maximum average age of the combat elements in static divisions was set at 36.
And yes, support elements could raise that to over 36. But that’s just theory…
Are there reasons to believe that actually happened in the 709ID? Not really. 🧐
The number of horses for the artillery as show here is actually too low because it included some batteries with just 3 guns, instead of the actual 4
For Normandy such 'standard' divisions included the 271ID, 272ID, 275ID, 276ID, 277ID, 331ID, 352ID, 353ID, 363ID. Of course these were not identical in strength for various reasons