On this 6 month anniversary of 1/6/2021 insurrection, it is important we take an account of where we are. Lots of bad news and worrying for our democracy. But, through the dismay, I'll do the good news part lest the hard work be viewed as totally futile. Thread. 1/
A week after 1/6, I wrote this @TheAtlantic about how viewing Trump as the leader of a terror organization was now the correct framework. It was viewed by many in my field as paranoid, too extreme, the wrong framing. We now know much more about 1/6. 2/ theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
I had long viewed Trump has inciting terror, and used words like "stochastic terrorism" to describe his brand of inciting, without owning, violence. It was too benign. Violence is his north star, the GOP knows it. The Big Lie isn't some political rally; it is a call to arms. 3/
The Big Lie, with its related voter suppression efforts that threaten criminal penalties against voters -- and lets be real here, brown and black voters -- in swing states, is their justification to take back, through any means, what they have been deprived by democracy. 4/
What to do? Only Trump's isolation, the prosecution of those involved in 1/6, and the continuing shaming of those who would utilize violence are the way forward. I am less interested in changing minds, in understanding hate. Many spend time musing about the "why." We know why. 5/
Terror groups only survive with convincing others they are winners. Don't look for perfect. Isolate Trump. De-platform him. Prosecute those involved with 1/6, impacting recruitment and organizing. Have terrorists turn against each other. Shame them. Isolate 6/
with loss of jobs and communities. Do not nurture it, as it had been done for years under Trump. Something horrible festers in this country, but this country has never been free of heinousness. We can, though, hope to minimize the terror. 7/
And there are plenty of signs we can do that, with all the signs we still have a long way to go. Trump struggles for oxygen. The terror groups struggle for money and recruits. They are turning on each other in court cases. Communities are rising up against the hate. 8/
I describe those 3 signs again here: "decapitate" (figuratively) the terror leader; prosecute violent extremism with 100s of cases; shame and isolate them through community and social media efforts. @CNN@Boris_Sanchez 9/
In PA this weekend, white supremacists put their hoods back on; compare to Charlottesville and 1/6 when they thought they were immune to consequences, when the Oval Office was their defender. They are hiding from the law and our norms. Is that progress? Take the win.
10/
Trust me, I am well aware of the ifs, ands, and buts. One can worry themselves about America's future without looking too hard. But, despair can make us not see some of the progress. It is worth doing that every once in a while, if only as incentive to continue the fight 🇺🇸11/11
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thread on #InsurrectionAct. After Hurricane Katrina, when civil society had broken down and basic food and water needs not addressed, Pres. Bush was presented with the option to invoke the #Insurrection Act to deploy active military. The merits were strong. Still, he declined 1/
It will go down as one of the most "what if" questions of that era. Deployments like that are complicated and it is naive to think the military would have solved everything.
But perhaps they could have solved more. And Bush liked military efforts, after all. 2/
In his recollections, and others, it was the idea of deploying active military, not trained for such efforts, opposed by the Governor (a Democrat then), and the precedent it would set for the nation that got him to no. 3/
How to measure success? On ransomware, the goal is delay and disruption; stopping Putin isn't about some legal action. So, some wins #GenevaSummit for US have already happened at G7 and NATO with greater focus and cooperation against Russia. Also 1/
Attribution isn't nothing. Calling out Putin's acceptance of criminal enterprises that target US networks is a positive step SINCE the opposite was occurring before (remember Trump focused on China and Iran). 2/
Those criminal enterprises will be less confident of continuing their mayhem against US civilians if they think either Putin might go after one or more of them as a public gesture to curb continuing international pressure or DOJ continues to disrupt their access to currency. 3/
NEW: The National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism is out. Importantly, it distinguishes our focus on 1/6 from the larger issue of white supremacy, which predates it. Some of it is familiar, but there are also some important new highlights. 1/ whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
Before getting into the details, it is essential that the WH owns this issue, and owns it for us. While there is evidence of foreign countries amplifying our hate, this is an American problem. We have to embrace it to try to expel it. And that is a start. 2/
Details. First, it focuses on a specific issue: violence. While it gives due course to underlying hate, it also recognizes that the use of violence, or threat of it, is of primary importance. That is key because it opens up a conversation about guns, which are hard to ignore. 3/
Thread about MAGA violence and calling it out. MTG's comments aren't just about Nazis. Her words are in line with a narrative of Trumpism: endorsing violence or threat of violence for political gain, a throughline from 2016 to 1/6 to disenfranchisement efforts. 1/
Greene is disturbed. She is also promoting a familiar violent narrative meant to incite. Greene is equating those who support masking with Nazis. That's obvious. But it is more than horrifying. It is code. If we are Nazis, then violence towards us is justified. Wink and nod. 2/
It's a technique Trump mastered; promote violence without saying so, a sophisticated use of stochastic (inciting for random acts of violence) terrorism. "Liberate Michigan!" and they tried to kidnap the Gov. He would deny it. Just a joke, his people would say.
3/
The "vaccine wall" I've been describing is distressing but also not surprising. We go from riding a wave to walking through molasses as we hit demand issues related to access and hesitancy. Requires comms and delivery shifts at tactical level. Big is no longer best. 1/
.@erictopol is pointing out here the reality we knew was coming. So we pivot. There are other commentators (not Eric!) freaking out about this, saying the WH is trying to spin the numbers. I don't get that "take" however satisfying it may be for folks to just complain. 2/
Every major logistics challenge follows the same path: rough start, oil to the engine, then a surge and wave, then molasses. Thankfully, the WH got us to this slower stage sooner than we could have ever hoped under Trump. 3/
To science friends: @ScienceMagazine@hholdenthorp asked me about public health comms and lessons learned. As a mere consumer of health intelligence to guide things I do -- assist state, local and private entities and public how to respond -- I have some (hard) takes. Thread. 1/
Health intelligence is like other intelligence: imperfect, changing as we learn, looks solely through one lens. It provides insights into the "what," but the ultimate decisions often have to take into account costs and benefits that aren't necessarily "scientific" in nature. 2/
Thorp's editorial from the interview lays out the key takeaway: in a national crisis, there are many lanes, all relevant for a nation suffering. We could blame Trump and, while correct, that is too easy. 3/ science.sciencemag.org/content/372/65…