I'm gobsmacked by the interview just now on @cbcasithappens with the manager of Nashville North, a private nightclub on the Stampede grounds in Calgary. His explanation of their privatized health protection plan (allowed now Kenney has lifted all restrictions) was horrifying: ..2
* Club will operate at full capacity, no masks required
* Entrants must either show a facsimile of a COVID vaccination (just 1 shot required, not 2) or take a rapid COVID test
* Both of those are obviously very unreliable (efficacy of 1 shot against COVID variants is risky) ..3
* The manager boasted about being 1st venue in Cda to require COVID vaccination proof as condition of entry. This system will not do that, however. Any teenager knows it's easy to provide fake physical ID, let alone fake an image of a document on a phone ..4
* Manager deferred health judgments to a private health provider they have hired, who's "confident" this plan is safe, and will operate 4 booths to screen/test patrons.
* That private consultant has an obvious conflict of interest in allowing this dangerous venture to proceed ..5
* This amounts to a privatization of public health protection, and it can only end badly.
* It is the direct result of Kenney's desperate, politically-motivated rush to open Stampede and start the "best summer ever."
* Genuine public health guidance should not let this happen ..7
Important concluding context: As of today, Alberta still has more active COVID cases, and fewer administered vaccines, per 100,000 people than the Canadian avg. The fact that Alberta (and Nashville North) are "opening first" doesn't mean Alberta did better at stopping COVID ..8
What is DOES mean is that Alberta's government AND businesses are more willing to jeopardize public health for short-term political & financial gain. As a native Albertan who hopes to go back there during this "best summer ever", this is both appalling and frightening.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD "Heartbreaking" is the only word I can find to describe today's awful 🇨🇦 #LFS jobs numbers: both the scale of job loss, and their painfully unfair distribution. 213K jobs lost in January, back to August levels of employment, unemployment, and participation. #cdnecon ...2
Just like the first wave, job loss is concentrated among those who can least afford it. Part-timers lost all the jobs; full-timers gained work. Women lost work twice as fast as men. Temporary jobs disappeared 7 times faster than permanent. Youth (under 25) lost work 4x faster...3
The racial concentration of economic hardship mirrors the racial inequity of COVID infection. Unemployment among racialized communities is twice or more as high as for whites. 20% for SE Asian, 16% for black & Latinx. ...4
Apart from the calculated brutality of this view, think what it would mean for prison guards & medical staff who work in prisons (which have suffered many horrible outbreaks). O'Toole's cheap politicking would consign those workers to death along with the prisoners. #Shameless
Here are some questions I really hope reporters will ask today: 1. To Theresa Tam and other PHO's: Why do you think prisoners should get the vaccine, and what are the health risks to the PUBLIC if they are not vaccinated?
...2
2. To legal experts: What are the constitutional, civil, and even criminal risks of denying essential health care to prisoners, and what are the financial risks to the federal govt if courts should rule against this policy?
...3
Before people go into paroxysms of deficit-angst today, keep in mind a fundamental truth of economic accounting: one sector's deficit is another's surplus. By pumping billions into income supports & business subsidies, fed govt literally made us richer #FiscalUpdate#cdnpoli ..2
Household saving grew dramatically during the pandemic: partly because shopping was hard, but mostly because fed income supports & wage subsidies protected incomes. Business saving also grew (less dramatically). Graph shows change in quarterly net savings from 4Q19 to 2Q20. ...3
Without that huge injection (and corresponding deficit), households would have experienced much bigger losses, with resulting macro-economic destruction: collapsed spending, evictions, worse job loss. Best of all: negative real interest rates mean it cost govt nothing.
THREAD: Today's Retirement Income report has a long discussion about whether changes in the super guarantee are automatically passed through in offsetting change in wages. Here's the graph the report claims proves that workers pay for their own super through wage cuts: ...2
What that graph *actually* says is that something between 30% and 145% of changes in SG are reflected in offsetting changes in future wage growth. Yes, you read it right: it could be 145%: that is, if super goes up, your wages will fall by 1.45 times as much. Not clear why ...3
Our research last year found no evidence of a systematic wage/SG trade-off in historical macroeconomic data: futurework.org.au/abandoning_sup…. We said both wages & SG are determined by institutions, norms, & power. Whether they move together or apart depends on the balance of forces...4
It's painfully ironic that amidst the worst fall in *paid* employment since the 1930s, and with a huge shift to working from home, the amount of *unpaid* overtime in the 🇦🇺 economy has gone UP this year. @CntrFutureWork estimates (by @Dan_Nahum) show 5.25 hrs/week on avg. ...2
That's worth almost $100 billion per yr in stolen time. Economic recovery needs every single $ of purchasing power we can put in the pockets of workers. Paying them for the work they already do would be a great start! See full report: futurework.org.au/go_home_on_tim…#GoHomeOnTimeDay ...3
In this context, we can understand (but not agree with) the demands of the Chamber of Commerce and other business groups for more "flexibility" in rules for work-from-home. They want this $100 billion gravy train to continue. The rest of need to make home work safe & fair. ...4
It is infuriating how the false narrative that Canada faced a "debt crisis" in the 1990s has been repeated so often by fiscal conservatives, it is now reported as fact--even by platforms that should know better (eg. @CBCNewscbc.ca/news/politics/…). ...2
The phony claim of a looming "debt wall" was invoked to justify the huge retrenchment of EI & other social programs, most dramatically in the 1995 budget, impoverishing hundreds of thousands. The sustained failure of EI ever since is why govt had to invent CERB in this crisis...3
Lo and behold, the fed budget was miraculously balanced just 2 years later (in 1997, years ahead of "schedule"). No debt crisis occurred, or would have. I reviewed this phony history in 2003 for @ccpa, worth reading again to contest this false history policyalternatives.ca/sites/default/… ...4