Apart from the calculated brutality of this view, think what it would mean for prison guards & medical staff who work in prisons (which have suffered many horrible outbreaks). O'Toole's cheap politicking would consign those workers to death along with the prisoners. #Shameless
Here are some questions I really hope reporters will ask today:
1. To Theresa Tam and other PHO's: Why do you think prisoners should get the vaccine, and what are the health risks to the PUBLIC if they are not vaccinated?
...2
2. To legal experts: What are the constitutional, civil, and even criminal risks of denying essential health care to prisoners, and what are the financial risks to the federal govt if courts should rule against this policy?
...3
3. To leaders of unions of prison guards, prison health workers, and other prison staff: What would your response be if obvious measures were not taken to reduce the spread of COVID in these workplaces, including possible industrial action?
...4
4. To indigenous and black leaders: Given that the prisoner population is highly disproportionate in its racial composition, how would you respond to a policy that barred the vaccine from prisoners?
...5
5. To Erin O'Toole: Should decisions regarding the order in which Canadians receive the vaccine be made by the Prime Minister, or by public health officials?

On so many levels this offensive outburst reveals not just calculated cruelty (aimed at his base) but inability to govern
Very thoughtful from @IvisonJ about O'Toole's call to deny COVID vaccines to prisoners: nationalpost.com/opinion/john-i…. With polling at 25% and falling, this is all about "saving the furniture" & energizing his hard-core base.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jim Stanford

Jim Stanford Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JimboStanford

30 Nov 20
Before people go into paroxysms of deficit-angst today, keep in mind a fundamental truth of economic accounting: one sector's deficit is another's surplus. By pumping billions into income supports & business subsidies, fed govt literally made us richer #FiscalUpdate #cdnpoli ..2
Household saving grew dramatically during the pandemic: partly because shopping was hard, but mostly because fed income supports & wage subsidies protected incomes. Business saving also grew (less dramatically). Graph shows change in quarterly net savings from 4Q19 to 2Q20. ...3
Without that huge injection (and corresponding deficit), households would have experienced much bigger losses, with resulting macro-economic destruction: collapsed spending, evictions, worse job loss. Best of all: negative real interest rates mean it cost govt nothing.
Read 6 tweets
20 Nov 20
THREAD: Today's Retirement Income report has a long discussion about whether changes in the super guarantee are automatically passed through in offsetting change in wages. Here's the graph the report claims proves that workers pay for their own super through wage cuts: ...2
What that graph *actually* says is that something between 30% and 145% of changes in SG are reflected in offsetting changes in future wage growth. Yes, you read it right: it could be 145%: that is, if super goes up, your wages will fall by 1.45 times as much. Not clear why ...3
Our research last year found no evidence of a systematic wage/SG trade-off in historical macroeconomic data: futurework.org.au/abandoning_sup…. We said both wages & SG are determined by institutions, norms, & power. Whether they move together or apart depends on the balance of forces...4
Read 8 tweets
18 Nov 20
It's painfully ironic that amidst the worst fall in *paid* employment since the 1930s, and with a huge shift to working from home, the amount of *unpaid* overtime in the 🇦🇺 economy has gone UP this year. @CntrFutureWork estimates (by @Dan_Nahum) show 5.25 hrs/week on avg. ...2
That's worth almost $100 billion per yr in stolen time. Economic recovery needs every single $ of purchasing power we can put in the pockets of workers. Paying them for the work they already do would be a great start! See full report: futurework.org.au/go_home_on_tim… #GoHomeOnTimeDay ...3
In this context, we can understand (but not agree with) the demands of the Chamber of Commerce and other business groups for more "flexibility" in rules for work-from-home. They want this $100 billion gravy train to continue. The rest of need to make home work safe & fair. ...4
Read 4 tweets
28 Oct 20
It is infuriating how the false narrative that Canada faced a "debt crisis" in the 1990s has been repeated so often by fiscal conservatives, it is now reported as fact--even by platforms that should know better (eg. @CBCNews cbc.ca/news/politics/…). ...2
The phony claim of a looming "debt wall" was invoked to justify the huge retrenchment of EI & other social programs, most dramatically in the 1995 budget, impoverishing hundreds of thousands. The sustained failure of EI ever since is why govt had to invent CERB in this crisis...3
Lo and behold, the fed budget was miraculously balanced just 2 years later (in 1997, years ahead of "schedule"). No debt crisis occurred, or would have. I reviewed this phony history in 2003 for @ccpa, worth reading again to contest this false history policyalternatives.ca/sites/default/… ...4
Read 6 tweets
28 Sep 20
Some thoughts on BC Liberal plan to eliminate PST for 1 year, and cut it by 4 points (57%) after that:

The 2020 budget says PST would raise $7.9b this fiscal year, rising to $8.6b by 2022. So the Liberals' costing seems too low.
#bcpoli ...2
They say their plan would cost $6.9b in year 1, $4b after. Seems like it would be more like $8b in year 1 (depending when it starts), $4.5-5b/year after that. So they are low-balling the fiscal implications of this very expensive idea. ...3
In year 1, their plan would thus increase the (already-record-high) provincial deficit by over half: from projected $13b to something like $21b. I am not averse to larger deficits to spur post-COVID reconstruction, but we need to be sure we're spending the funds well. ...4
Read 14 tweets
23 Sep 20
If actions match these words, this #SFT will be a historic step forward in Canadian social policy in several key areas: childcare, disability GIS, pharmacare, and a new EI system. All ambitious, and necessary. #BuildBackBetter #cdnpoli ...2
Somewhat reminiscent of Pearson's minority governments in the mid-60s, which brought in CPP, medicare, and the Canada Assistance Plan. Minority government can work well! ...3
Conservatives' predictable rant on deficits & debt will go nowhere, esp. as Canadians are losing sleep over COVD 2nd wave & continuing recession (not debt bogeymen). And CPC won't whisper about what they'd cut for a smaller deficit: they know that would be the end of them. #SFT
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!