Projection - that's what they do - they accuse us of doing the evil things that they actually do. I previously wrote about Ruben Verastugui - evil incarnate - but I missed this story about his buddy Adam Hageman. politico.com/news/2021/03/0…
Verastugui is the most evil thing I have ever tweeted about, and of course he was part of the RNC and Repub Senate media teams, as well as a big figure in the youth "pro-life" movement.
Verastugui pleaded guilty yesterday, admitting the facts in the charging affidavit that he fantasized about raping and killing infants. The Politico story included new facts: the chat group included 18 people; one of them was Hageman. politico.com/news/2021/07/0…
Hageman was a Trump appointee to the Commerce Dept. who came out of Turning Point USA (@clearing_fog @YDanasmithdutra), which is funded by the regular right-wing billionaire characters. It appears that Hageman is not cooperating in hopes of a leniency in sentencing.
Hageman is typical youth, right wing, conservative - he possessed and distributed child rape videos and he was buddies with a guy that shared the same and WORKED FOR THE RNC 2017-2018 AND THE SENATE REPUBLICAN CONFERENCE 2019-2020.
I REALLY want these criminals off the street and I am glad that Verastugui and Habeman are no longer free to undermine free society.

Now let's get the people that put them in positions of trust and power.
I receive many tips and reminders from my friends on twitter. For this one, I want to specifically thank @jennikabrewer, good soul whose memory is vastly better than mine.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dirk Schwenk (Esq) 🎵

Dirk Schwenk (Esq) 🎵 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DirkSchwenk

1 Jul
If Weisselberg and his son were being paid off books ... what are the chances that Trump and his sons (and Ivanqa) were being paid off books?
Come to think of it, don't ALL the executives of Trump Org live in housing owned by Trump Org? It seems like that might be a tangible, taxable perquisite. businessinsider.com/donald-trump-p…
Just as I thought (now that I'm thinking about it) - housing is a taxable fringe benefit unless fairly strict exceptions apply. corporatehousing.com/blog/corporate…
Read 15 tweets
9 Jun
Here is my response to everyone's ridiculous takes about how the DoJ shouldn't defend the office of the POTUS from sex assault allegations. The evils are ALREADY teeing up sex assault allegations against Biden. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Biden…
Sure we don't want Trump being defended by the DoJ. BUT IT'S NOT TRUMP BEING DEFENDED BY THE DOJ IT'S THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT FROM ATTACKS BY THE EVILS.
And it's not even sex assault allegations that are being defended. It's the denial - the words - which every politician has to be entitled to do if someone makes an allegation against them.
Read 14 tweets
8 Jun
@BarbMcQuade is a formidable legal mind and this article is quite good. Nevertheless, here is DIRK'S HOT TAKE EXPLAINING WHY THE TWITTER MOB AND BARB ARE WRONG ON THIS POINT.
(I nevertheless take a moment to note I too am frustrated with the glacial pace of justice regarding the obvious trumpist crime wave of the past couple of years)
Key Point One: Ms. Carrol's suit is not about the attack she endured at Trump's hands back in the day. It alleges that Trump lied about the attack when she came forward about it in 2019. THE DOJ IS NOT DEFENDING A RAPE CASE.
Read 9 tweets
28 May
What Durham is doing is one of the great mysteries of the Barr era. I still think there's an above-zero chance he finds the opposite of Trumpists want, but I am less confident now that we know RR and O'Callaghan were turned. $1.5M is not a lot of money, really.
If you wanna don the Rose Coloreds ... we now know that Rosenstein and O'Callaghan ventured right up to the edge (and maybe beyond) of obstruction as Barr came aboard as AG. Durham is authorized to prosecute any crimes related to the Mueller investigation. Image
And we know that O'Callaghan was in the NATSEC division up until RR elevated him to supervise the Russia investigation. Durham is empowered to investigate "intelligence, counter-intelligence or law enforcement activities." justice.gov/file/1370931/d…
Read 7 tweets
25 May
Judge Jackson is about to lower the boom on the Rosenstein and O'Callaghan conspiracy to keep Trump from being prosecuted.
They spoon fed Barr their own choice: to ignore all DOJ policy and make an affirmative decision NOT to prosecute Trump.
These clips are from today's reporting in the Washington Post which you should read. washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
Read 14 tweets
25 May
Please take a moment before ripping the DOJ. This is not a wholesale appeal - it is tailored, see below.
As attorneys, we are trained from the beginning that attorney-client privilege is our most sacred trust. We should go to jail to protect it, we should NEVER violate that trust voluntarily.
The Court's decision was that there were portions of the memo that were after-the-fact cover for a decision already made, and that some was mere political advice -- those parts will be released.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(