HUGE misunderstandings arising from Active Addresses vs Entities.
Entities: Estimates users via on-chain forensics
Active Addresses: Impacted by user growth, wallet activity (trade conditions), mempool congestion (drops in hash rate), fees spamming.
Chart: Unprecedented growth of users joining the network during this price dip while active addresses plummet.
-> It's a time of low volatility (less traders sending coins between exchanges to trade) and at a time when the network hash rate experienced The Great China Migration.
Any analysis using active addresses in this time where China tripped the power cord in April (power outages) and a historic banning of miners in May/June will be stupidly flawed.
Another example of bad address analysis:
The "whales are dumping" meme.
No. It's just a count of addresses that contain more than 1000 BTC.
It could mean exchanges depleting inventory, or whale population is reducing, or just wallet consolidation. Nothing is definitive.
In reality, under entity analysis across ALL participants including exchanges... whales 10k+ are selling, while 1k-10k are buying what was sold. Everyone else is stacking. Speculative exchange inventory is depleting.
(It's bullish supply shock)
In all of these examples, address analysis is bearish based on unthoughtful "past correlation" as a flawed way to draw a conclusion. Address analysis fails to dissect exactly what's going on. Unprecedented times of change on the network is what's going on!
No single chart can be used as a holy grail, there's 100s of views into the network and it's detective work to figure out exactly what's happening.
@glassnode entities data is $600 per month. I'm not seeing any analyst posting bearish charts using this tier of data.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Grayscale is a unique product. It's designed as a black hole that sucks in BTC.
No BTC ever leaves the trust, apart from Grayscale taking its 2% management fees from the holdings, this is the only way to reduce the GBTC inventory.
How does GBTC increase its holdings?
They allow accredited investors to add BTC into the trusts holdings in return for receiving shares in the trust (which normally trades at a premium to BTC).
Oh my, Rick Astley is back. Coins are moving back to the HODLer who never deserts his BTC.
The previous chart was a 30 day sum of coin movements.
Here's the 7 day view showing greater granularity.
We can see how the mass of coins dumped out to speculative hands are being re-accumulated by strong hands in a pattern similar to the COVID recovery (8 weeks to recover).
#marketupdate, IMO from on-chain is sideways then bullish in maybe a week or so.
Some downside risk if stonks tank, a lot of rallying in the DXY (USD strength) which is typical of money moving to safety.
The first thing to look at is to answer "are we in a bear market". Welp, bear markets start when no new buyers enter to support price and that aint happening, we have healthy growth of new users joining the network.
Let this frame all other metrics.
Of primary interest is capital rotation from stablecoins back into the crypto markets (I'll say that's mainly BTC since alt coins are reducing in dominance).
All of that dry powder sitting on the sidelines has started flowing back in.
Exchange dominance increased over time. This had the effect of making a proportion of the long term investor volume invisible to on-chain analysis, only happening inside exchanges.