This morning French foreign minister delivered an important speech at @CarnegieEndow and @franceintheus on France's vision for the Indo-Pacific and China. A 🧵 for those who missed it 👇
First, Jean-Yves Le Drian stressed that the Indo-Pacific has become "a central region for the balances of the world" and that there is a "rising awareness" among Europeans about this strategic shift.
France is particularly cognizant of the importance of the Indo-Pacific, as it defines itself as an "Indo-Pacific nation" thanks to its overseas territories which are home to 1.6 million French citizens. These territories provide to France the second largest EEZ in the world.
France is implementing its own national Indo-Pacific strategy based on four pillars. First, stronger action to address regional security challenges (maritime security, fight against terrorism). Second, strategic partnerships with key actors such as Japan, Australia or India.
Third, stronger cooperation with regional organizations, starting with the ASEAN. And, finally, the promotion of global public goods (notably the environment and biodiversity).
Collectively, Europeans have also "fundamental interests" in the region and are "clear-headed" about China and "the way it asserts its power". "Europe has no choice but to assert itself in the international scene, and in particular in the Indo-Pacific".
The European Union is therefore "building its own Indo-Pacific strategy" which will be one of the priorities of France as it chairs the 🇪🇺 in the first half of 2022.

csis.org/analysis/europ…
The Indo-Pacific will also be "at the heart of a renewed and rebalanced transatlantic partnership". The U.S. and Europe must "implement together a transatlantic pivot toward the Indo-Pacific".
"The approach that we must define together is not based on a confrontation with China but on the promotion of our own model based on democratic values and a rules-based international order".
"This involves to provide a democratic response to the rise of authoritarianism, the "brutalization" of the world and the many challenges facing multilateralism".
On China specifically, @JY_LeDrian noted a converging analysis with Washington which also views China as "a partner, a competitor and a strategic rival". "It is now up to us to find a balance between these dimensions which are interrelated".
i/ China as a partner: "We need China to take its responsibilities to address some pressing challenges", like climate, biodiversity, global inequalities or the international health regulation.
ii/ China as a competitor: "We must regulate the competition with China in terms of trade, technology, security". Multilateral organizations will be instrumental in this endeavor, notably to produce norms and standards which will apply to everybody.
iii/ China as a systemic rival: "We must promote our universal values. Which is at stake with China is our conception of the human being, its dignity, rights and liberties." @JY_LeDrian notably mentioned the human rights violations in #Xinjiang or 🇨🇳 "digital authoritarianism".
Finally, during the discussion with @sbg1, Jean-Yves Le Drian notably explains what could be role of #NATO toward China. "NATO is a transatlantic alliance, not a global alliance. But we can discuss the consequences of China for European security in NATO".
The speech and the conversation can be seen in replay here 👇 [End]

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Pierre Morcos

Pierre Morcos Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @morcos_pierre

13 Jul
My @CSIS colleague @cy_newlin and I have a new piece out today on #cyber. As the Biden administration is resuming its cyber dialogue with Moscow, France has some interesting lessons to share from its own experience with Russia. A thread 👇

csis.org/analysis/cyber…
In a bid for increased transparency and predictability with Russia, France initiated in 2018 several channels of dialogue: a confidential “deconfliction line” to discuss cyber incidents, as well as broader diplomatic consultations.
France essentially pursued three objectives: (1) addressing in a direct and confidential manner cyberattacks originating in Russia; (2) better understanding Russian cyber doctrine and apparatus; (3) engaging with Russia on norms of responsible behavior in cyberspace.
Read 11 tweets
13 Jul
🇯🇵🇫🇷 Just quickly read through the Japanese version of Japan 2021 defense white paper (681 page long !). France is mentioned 117 times in the document and is described as a "major power with influence not only in Europe and Africa, but also in the world".
The document underlines that France "is the only EU member state with a permanent military presence in the Indo-Pacific region" with "about 6,000 personnel, including naval vessels, stationed there".
🇯🇵 defense paper also outlines that France and Japan are "both maritime nations and Pacific nations [which] decided to launch a comprehensive maritime dialogue to promote concrete cooperation to maintain and strengthen a free and open Indo-Pacific".
Read 6 tweets
15 Jun
So there is a lot of bad blood about President Macron's comments on #China and #NATO. Let me clarify a few things. France is not opposed to NATO assessing the security implications of China's rise but has some legitimate concerns. A 🧵 👇
First, 🇫🇷 fully shares the assessment made in #NATO communiqué about the security challenges posed by 🇨🇳. Every word of the declaration is consistent with 🇫🇷 Strategic Update. 🇫🇷 is not trying to water down the threats coming from 🇨🇳 quite the contrary.

Second, 🇫🇷 is mindful that NATO's approach toward China is not purely confrontational toward 🇨🇳 and also includes a call for dialogue with Beijing. This balance is often overlooked but is actually in #NATO communiqué (see 👇) and is consistent with 🇪🇺 but also 🇺🇸 approaches.
Read 9 tweets
14 Jun
[Thread] My take on the communiqué of the #NATO summit in Brussels. Brace yourself for a long 🧵 on the main takeaways from this 79-paragraph long declaration 👇

nato.int/cps/en/natohq/…
1/ Values: Compared to the 2018 communiqué, today's declaration has a new para on transatlantic values which are described as "the bedrock of [NATO's] unity, solidarity, and cohesion". Allies also commit to consult "when [their] fundamental values and principles are at risk".
This para is a first step in the right declaration, even though more could still be done (see my piece bellow). The adoption of a new strategic concept will offer a new opportunity to demonstrate allies' genuine commitment to transatlantic values.

warontherocks.com/2021/06/nato-s…
Read 23 tweets
10 May
[Thread] 🇪🇺 Member States adopted today conclusions on security and defense, one year after the last ones (June 2020). A 🧵 on this 20-page long document which gives us an interesting glimpse of the upcoming 'Strategic Compass' 👇

consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press…
1/ The ambition: Instead of using the sometimes controversial terms of "strategic autonomy" or "European sovereignty", the document simply underlines Europe's ambition to "take more responsibility for its security" and "act autonomously" to become a "global security provider".
2/ The Strategic Compass: The conclusions confirms that the 'Strategic Compass' will define concrete policy orientations for the next 5 to 10 years in four areas : crisis management, resilience, capability development and partnerships.
Read 18 tweets
1 Dec 20
[Thread] The report of the experts group appointed by @jensstoltenberg to think on the future of NATO has just been released. Brace yourself because the report is 67-page long and has 138 recommendations. My initial thoughts 👇

nato.int/cps/en/natohq/…
1/ The starting point: Despite being one of the most successful military alliances in history, NATO has been confronted in recent years to growing internal divisions. These tensions have been increasingly difficult to manage amid a rapidly deteriorating security environment.
These flaws were bluntly highlighted by Pres. Macron in his itw with @TheEconomist in which he notably denounced the lack of political cohesion within the Alliance.

economist.com/europe/2019/11…
Read 28 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(